Hendrickson's petition for cert. in erroneous refund case

[Thule]

I have a hunch that Pete will not appear, even if he is invited. Unless he is allowed to ban anyone raising critical questions, including Jon Stewart.

[jkeeb]

I don't know how a comedian would do with PH, but generally protestors sound pretty good against any layman because they can and do quote "court cases" including "Supreme Court cases" and tax law.

Now people on this forum know when its BS, but the average lay person can only say "I think your wrong" or "Then, why do other people file and pay."

Same thing for conspiracy theorist's--they look good on TV because they have their memorized facts and it takes someone very knowledgeable to debunk.

[LPC]

Jon Stewart has interviewed ex-Presidents, presidential candidates, Senators, Representatives, at least one former Supreme Court justice, and governors, to name but a few, and he regularly books best-selling authors, top-ranked journalists, and well-known academics. Why would he want to interview a previously convicted, now indicted, temporary office worker whose only claim to fame is a book that has sold a few hundred copies?

If there's any humor to be had, it'll be done in one of the side pieces they do on crazy people, where they can edit the film afterwords to show Samantha Bee (or whomever) making funny faces as the idiot being interviewed says stupid things. (In case you couldn't tell, it's the part of the show I like the least.)

[LPC]

If Demo's book is ever published, we could nominate her for a spot on the Daily Show to flog her book. That might work.

[webhick]

If Demo's book is ever published, we could nominate her for a spot on the Daily Show to flog her book. That might work.

Colbert report so she can ask him about his Illuminati tattoo.

[Nikki]

Did some nasty person edit the referenced web site in the Vote Up / Vote Down blurb to read http://www.lasthorizons.com or was that just a stupid typo on the part of the loserhead who opened the topic?

[ASITStands]

Most of the revisions are by someone named, 'Richard614.'

Oops! That's one of the Lost Horizoners. Wonder what they think about being at -31?

[Famspear]

Looks like the page was set up by "Kyle Huwer." He posts at losthorizons as "PeacefulKancer."

[Dezcad]

Looks like the page was set up by "Kyle Huwer." He posts at losthorizons as "PeacefulKancer."

He has a Youtube channel and one of his videos is this one.. Speaks for itself - a Jordan Maxwell fan.

[Bud Dickman]

This is hilarious:

Per Weston White - Well now it appears that somebody is using a voting bot to drive it down, it just went down -400 in less than a minute.

[cynicalflyer]

Ooh! Ooh!

'Richard614' is now suggesting Pete Hendrickson go on 'The Daily Show' with Jon Stewart.

Like that will really help? Do these guys understand the importance of remaining silent?

The man's under criminal indictment, and he goes on 'PalTalk' every month. Now, they want him to go on 'The Daily Show,' so Jon Stewart can unveil the "truth about the income tax."

Of course, it fits the whole ego thing that's so much a part of 'Cracking the Code.'

The website, guests.dailyshownews.com, is NOT for the show, it is a fan run site. The votes for/against a guest have absolutely no bearing on who gets on. (Look at the main voting page, it even says "Perhaps The Daily Show will listen!") The main page, dailyshownews.com, simply fowards you to a fan blog.

That the Loserheads think that it is the official show site is simply hysterical. And sad. But mostly hysterical. Or maybe hysterically sad. Take your pick.

[ASITStands]

Thanks for clearing that up! I didn't think they had much chance of getting him on the show. My observation was that it was a 'dumb' thing to do anyway in light of Pete's problems.

Of course, now, Quatloos is getting the blame for all the negative hits. Hmm.

It's hilarious, as 'Bud' said!

[cynicalflyer]

According to Richardf614 "I started this thread on the advise of someone in the industry."

Anyone truly "in the industry" would be able to differentiate between a fan site (dailyshownews.com) which states at the top of its front page "Covering the number one fake news show, Comedy Central's The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" and the actual Daily Show website (thedailyshow.com) which states "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Official Website".

Richardf614, full of it? Noooo!!! Say it ain't so!

[Thule]

And Weaksauce comes up with this brilliant logic:

What is even more funny is they even still to date question why they are not permitted on this site. Meanwhile they proclaim on their own site that they do not suppress speech. Clearly their understanding of the IRC is not the only thing that is skewed.

http://losthorizons.com/phpBB/viewtopic ... c&start=45

Yeah. That's some fine thinkin', there, Weston.

[LPC]

One of weirder ("weirder" in the sense of incompetent or dishonest) claims in the petition for certiorari is that the action by the United States to recover the erroneous refunds is barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel, citing three cases in which the government had attempted to enforce summonses against Hendrickson, and then withdrawn the complaints, probably due to a decision to convert the case to criminal prosecution.

Two of the three dismissal explicitly state that they were without prejudice, and one of the was based on a stipulation to which Hendrickson's lawyer agreed, and F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(B) specifically states that, unless the notice of withdrawal or stipulation states otherwise, a voluntary dismissal by a plaintiff is without prejudice.

And yet Hendrickson wants the Supreme Court to believe that the voluntary dismissals of the enforcement actions are some kinds of admissions by the US which should bar any further claims against him. That's grasping at non-existent and imaginary straws that you dishonestly claim to exist.

[LOBO]

And Weaksauce comes up with this brilliant logic:

What is even more funny is they even still to date question why they are not permitted on this site. Meanwhile they proclaim on their own site that they do not suppress speech. Clearly their understanding of the IRC is not the only thing that is skewed.

http://losthorizons.com/phpBB/viewtopic ... c&start=45

Yeah. That's some fine thinkin', there, Weston.

Does anybody here question why their banned from CrackHeads? Petey, SubVet and whoever else moderates the forums are cowards who don't want the truth about their scam to be exposed and hurt Pete's book sales.

Also, running away when you get your head handed to you on this forum means suppressed.

In true Monty Python fashion....Tax Protestor, MN Stix, etc..."Help, help! We're being suppressed!"

[Thule]

In true Monty Python fashion....Tax Protestor, MN Stix, etc..."Help, help! We're being suppressed!"

Still rather fun when Weston tries to convince himself that when LH are banning dissenters on spot, they are actually promoting free speech.

The same Weston who claimes that "Oh and they know that even with all their legal backgrounds, we know and understand more about the law then they currently to or ever will!"

I wonder, how long before they start refering to Quatloos as 'doubleplus ungood' and questioning PH as 'thoughtcrime'?

[.]

10 years?

The expiration date on Crack-headism is about 6 months. By then, Blowhard will likely have had cert denied in his civil case and been carted off to federal prison in his criminal case.

Only the slowest of the slow won't by then have run off to the next losing pile of BS. The day the site disappears will be a dark day for TP-comedy buffs, but fortunately most of the idiots will resurface elsewhere.

[Thule]

More importantly, does it matter?

Purely for entertainment, I've always found it rather interesting to see how far down the stupid-ladder such people can go.

[Nikki]

10 years?

The expiration date on Crack-headism is about 6 months. By then, Blowhard will likely have had cert denied in his civil case and been carted off to federal prison in his criminal case.

Only the slowest of the slow won't by then have run off to the next losing pile of BS. The day the site disappears will be a dark day for TP-comedy buffs, but fortunately most of the idiots will resurface elsewhere.

Actually, the expiration date has passed.

As of this week, CtC-educated returns are officially listed as frivolous positions. Any CtC-educated submission, from this date on, has lost the possibility of reliance on Cheek.

It might take a while for this to seep through the skulls of the LoserHeads (they haven't even made reference to the latest "Truth" there), but as soon as they start getting enclosures from the IRS with their Fearless Loser's name spelled out on it, they will have to migrate to another guru.

Already, they are discussing packages for sale by other paytriots.