He isn't a guru, and I doubt that he aspires to be one. Perhaps he represents the rank-and-file freeman in the street.
So far, his videos have consisted of him reading aloud letters that he sends to various authorities.
His first, Council twats, 6 Nov 2014, has his letter to a council following an incident when (he says) he threw a parking ticket in the face of a parking officer. Transcribed, so any typos are mine:
In short, Lee hasn't signed any contracts about parking properly or not littering, so shouldn't be fined for this.Dear Sir,
As Lee Munro of the clan Munro I write to you in response to the incident mentioned in the letter I am returning to you. It is my understanding that equality before the law is paramount and mandatory so I hereby claim those rights. I now request clarification as to what law was broken other than any statutory regulations which I hereby do not consent to.
Furthermore I am declaring to you that I do not litter the streets with my own used property or litter anyone else's property. I also demand the name of the person making this claim against my person as I have the right under law to know my accuser. Failure to disclose this information will make your claims heresay.
Furthermore the litter you refer to is in fact not my property nor was it ever my property so under common law jurisdiction can you tell me what law was broken? I simply handed the note back to the corporate officer as I did not want to enter into a contract with his corporation.
I hereby seek clarification of the documentation so that I may act accordingly in the eyes of the law and maintain my entire body of inalienable natural rights. It is also my understanding that the council, being a service created by man, cannot hold property, it simply holds property in trust for the public. I do not see why the council sees fit to sue me for littering when the corporate officer in employment, and therefore representing the council, also was leaving litter on my own property, which was my mode of transport.
Furthermore, I reserve the right not to act under any contract that I did not enter into knowingly and intentionally, and I do not accept the the limited liability of any contract or commercial agreement not revealed to myself, which are my rights pursuant under common law of the land.
Furthermore, any property being held by me at the property, being intellectual property, real estate, trade tools, automobiles and any contents at the private postal address [redacted] are held under claims of right.
It is also my opinion and understanding that in the UK we have the right to a fair trial and due process, and all fines and forfeits to persons before conviction are null and void. The Bill of Rights Act 1689, which cannot be repealed, states that all grants or promises of particular fines on particular persons before conviction in a fair trial are null and void until the person or human being is convicted in a court of law. This is a constitutional act and protects our constitutional rights. Also, under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to a free trial and due process and in civil cases it protects the right to a public hearing from an independant and impartial tribunal within reasonable time. It is also my understanding that the council is a service created by man to serve man and requires contracts in order to claim authority over man.
As a gesture of goodwill I will accept liability and pay the fines upon the following demands that I make.
a. The council prove that I have harmed the council or caused the council any financial loss of any kind.
b. That there is a contractual obligation that I have infringed.
c. That allegations are part of a lawful investigation without unlawful prejudice.
Failure to accept this offer or clarification completely and in good-will will, within seven working days of receiving this offer, be deemed by all parties that you and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon me. All replies should be sent to the address mentioned no later than seven working days from the date of receiving this letter using recorded delivery.
Yours sincerely and in good faith,
Sir Lee Munro of the clan Munro.
Next, he is worried about bank fraud so he writes to Mortgage twats demanding to see a whole load of stuff.
His girlfriend has a student loan, so he writes to Studentloan.gov.ltd???. She accidentally hasn't paid her £10/month recently, but will start to do so again provided they send him loads of stuff, but won't pay the debt collector.
Then we return to the parking issue. TPTB have replied. Council twats 2 is his response. I'll summarise it: he mistakenly parked in a disabled bay. He doesn't follow David Icke, thinking the queen is a reptile. He won't pay a fine, or appeal, and claims the right to a trial. The council's threat of a warrant is hollow as only courts can issue warrant, and they have to be signed by judges. Maybe he shouldn't have mentioned paedophilia. Statutes don't apply to him.
Dvla twats is about unpaid road tax and a fine. I summarise: can he de-register? Isn't road tax unlawful and fraud and so on? He claims his right to a fair trial. He's happy to pay provided they answer his stupid questions.
Returning to the main story, Lee's littering fine has escalated from £35 to a total of £302.50. Magistrates twats, 20 Feb 2015, is his written response to the court. The case has been held (on 10 Feb). He was in court but didn't stand up. He got contempt of court. Now he wants copies of court documents on his case, and want to know why they spelled his name wrong, and in capitals. His trial wasn't fair. He hasn't really been found guilty. The allegation was a lie: he didn't throw the parking ticket and ticket bag, but merely the ticket. He didn't rip the ticket into a million pieces, but merely into four. He didn't throw the ticket to the ground, but at the parking officer. Anyhow, she picked it up. He wants to see the video evidence. He is thinking about filing charges on the judge: harassment, fraud, treason and wasting Lee's time. He shouldn't have to pay costs or a victim surcharge. TPTB can't take away his car. Lee doesn't consent to anything. He will take it to Queen's Bench if they don't accept his final offer of £2, which they have to accept because of the Bills of Exchange Act.
I suppose they didn't accept his offer of £2. They may have suggested that disputing the evidence when the trial is over was pointless. At any rate, this brings us up to date, with Lee's latest offering, Magistrates twat2. This is a recording of Lee on the phone to the court. He wants to ask the woman who answers the phone a few questions. They spelled his name wrong - does that make any difference? Under his laws, he hasn't broken any laws, so he shouldn't have been found guilty? Does she know the difference between the law of the sea and the law of the land? [At this point, she goes away to check something, but just before Lee is put on hold I think I detect the beginnings of a fit of giggles.] She comes back and explains he can ask the Crown Court for leave to appeal out of time, and he can complain to the court manager about court processes. He's not going to pay the fine because he's not guilty; the court had no authority; why did the summons say he deposited the ticket's plastic cover when the only thing he threw was the ticket?
[As this point, I am ROFLing, as the young people say. He is trying to argue his case all over again, to an administrative person in the court. This is entirely pointless. Admin staff can do nothing to help. His case has been heard. Unless he appeals, it is ended. And the case never turned on the amount of litter he discarded, merely that he discarded some, which he freely admits.]
She reads out the charge: "threw down, dropped or otherwise deposited litter, namely a penalty charge notice and ticket bag". Lee tries to explain to her, for the record, that he didn't throw the bag. She tries to explain something to him; probably that this discussion is a waste of electrons. He hasn't finished telling her what he wants to tell her and doesn't like her "butting in". She says, "I'm sorry, I'm going to put the phone down now," and does so.
Lee's story hasn't ended. I doubt that he'll be granted leave to appeal, and I doubt that he'll pay the fine. I look forward to more entertainment.
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
, FOTL/sovrun types seem to have a native, nay an inborn talent for turning something minor like a parking citation in to a major felony, and I have every faith our illiterate, ill spoken, and intemperate friend here will rise, or perhaps that is sink, to the occasion. After all stupidity will out.