Although some consider Wikipedia to be a religion....
It seems that I was supposed to follow up my complaint against a disruptive editor as soon as I was able to type, rather than waiting until I could type coherently. Who knew?
In any case, I may not be able to keep the proper subjects of this board from eulogizing* themselves much longer. I'm specifically asking those who are not familiar with my work on Wikipedia not to come to my defense; if I were to ask, that would be considered "canvassing", which is considered by Wikipedia to be improper, even if done in other fora. I'm just ranting, here.
*I discovered that "eulogize" does not imply the subject is (or should be) dead. I thought of "eulogize", and looked for a better word in a thesaurus, and discovered I had a pretty good word, after all.
Wikipedia problems
-
- Tupa-O-Quatloosia
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
- Location: Brea, CA
Wikipedia problems
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
-
- Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
- Posts: 8246
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
- Location: The Evergreen Playground
Re: Wikipedia problems
Not hard for me to not come to your defense since I don't have a clue what you are talking about.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs