Latest filings on the Duo

[notorial dissent]

William Julian 60 months
Kurt Johnson
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of 300 months . This term consists of 240 months on Count One to run consecutively to the term of 60 months on Counts Two through Five, Nine through Fourteen, Nineteen through Twenty-five, Thirty-three, Thirty-four, and Thirty-eight through Fifty-two, all counts to be served concurrently.
[x ] The defendant shall forfeit the defendant's interest in the following property to the United States:
1) The U.S. currency in the amount of $178,000, which was seized from Bank of America account
#776234677; and
2) The U.S. currency in the amount of $50,000, which was seized from Bank of America account #05808-

Dale Scott Heinemann
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of 260 months . This term consists of 240 months on Count One to run consecutively with 20 months on Counts Two through Five, Nine through Fourteen, Nineteen through Twentyfive, Thirty-three, Thirty-four, and Thirty-eight through Fifty-two, all counts to be served concurrently.

So looks like dum is going away for 25 years and dummer for 20.

[Pauligirl]

forgive the crappy formatting

United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
WILLIAM JULIAN
JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE
USDC Case Number: CR-05-00611-007 WHA
BOP Case Number: DCAN305CR000611-007
USM Number: 90273-111
Defendant's Attorney: Michael Berger
THE DEFENDANT:
[x] pleaded guilty to count(s): One of the Superseding Indictment .
[ ] pleaded nolo contendere to count(s) which was accepted by the court.
[ ] was found guilty on count(s) after a plea of not guilty.
The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these offense(s):
Title & Section Nature of Offense
Offense
Ended Count
18 U.S.C. § 1349 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MAIL FRAUD JULY 2005 ONE
The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 7 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the
Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
[ ] The defendant has been found not guilty on count(s) .
[x] Remaining Count(s) of the Superseding Indictment are dismissed on the motion of the United States.
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name,
residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered
to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of any material changes in economic circumstances.
March 18, 2008
Date of Imposition of Judgment
Signature of Judicial Officer
Honorable William Alsup, U. S. District Judge
Name & Title of Judicial Officer
March 19, 2008
Date
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 598 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 1


IMPRISONMENT
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be
imprisoned for a total term of 60 months .




United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
KURT F. JOHNSON
JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE
USDC Case Number: CR-05-00611-002 WHA
BOP Case Number: DCAN305CR000611-002
USM Number: 13177-081
Defendant's Attorney: Pro Per
THE DEFENDANT:
[ ] pleaded guilty to count(s): .
[ ] pleaded nolo contendere to count(s) which was accepted by the court.
[x] was found guilty on count(s) 1, 2 through 5, 9 through 14, 19 through 25, 33, 34, 38 through 52 of the Superseding Indictment
after a plea of not guilty.
The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these offense(s):
Title & Section Nature of Offense
Offense
Ended Count
18 U.S.C. § 1349 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MAIL FRAUD 1
18 U.S.C. § 1341 MAIL FRAUD 2 through 5,
9 through 14,
19 through 25,
33, 34,
38 through 52
The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 7 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the
Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
[ ] The defendant has been found not guilty on count(s) .
[ ] Count(s) (is)(are) dismissed on the motion of the United States.
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name,
residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered
to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of any material changes in economic circumstances.
March 18, 2008
Date of Imposition of Judgment
Signature of Judicial Officer
Honorable William Alsup, U. S. District Judge
Name & Title of Judicial Officer
March 19, 2008
Date
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 596 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) (CAND Rev. 3/07) Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 2 - Imprisonment

IMPRISONMENT
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be
imprisoned for a total term of 300 months . This term consists of 240 months on Count One to run
consecutively to the term of 60 months on Counts Two through Five, Nine through Fourteen, Nineteen through
Twenty-five, Thirty-three, Thirty-four, and Thirty-eight through Fifty-two, all counts to be served concurrently.
[x] The Court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons:
Court strongly recommends the defendant be designated to a separate facility from co-defendant Dale Scott
Heineman.
[x] The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. The appearance bond is hereby
exonerated.
[ ] The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district.
[ ] at [] am [] pm on .
[ ] as notified by the United States Marshal.
The appearance bond shall be deemed exonerated upon the surrender of the defendant.
[ ] The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of
Prisons:
[ ] before 2:00 pm on .
[ ] as notified by the United States Marshal.
[ ] as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.
The appearance bond shall be deemed exonerated upon the surrender of the defendant.
RETURN
I have executed this judgment as follows:
Defendant delivered on to
at , with a certified copy of this judgment.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL
By
Deputy United States Marshal
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 596 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 2 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 3 - Supervised Release
DEFENDANT: KURT F. JOHNSON Judgment - Page 3 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-002 WHA
SUPERVISED RELEASE
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be on supervised release for a term of 5 years . This term consists of 5
years on each of Counts One through Five, Nine through Fourteen, Nineteen through Twenty-five, Thirty-three, Thirty-four, and
Thirty-eight through Fifty-two, all such terms to run concurrently.
The defendant must report to the probation office in the district to which the defendant is released within 72 hours of release from the
custody of the Bureau of Prisons.
The defendant shall not commit another federal, state or local crime.
The defendant shall not unlawfully possess a controlled substance. The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled
substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and two periodic drug tests
thereafter.
[ ] The above drug testing condition is suspended based on the court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future
substance abuse. (Check if applicable.)
[x] The defendant shall not possess a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or any other dangerous weapon. (Check if
applicable.)
[x] The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer. (Check if applicable.)
[ ] The defendant shall register with the state sex offender registration agency in the state where the defendant resides, works, or
is a student, as directed by the probation officer. (Check if applicable.)
[ ] The defendant shall participate in an approved program for domestic violence. (Check if applicable.)
If this judgment imposes a fine or restitution, it is a condition of supervised release that the defendant pay in accordance with
the Schedule of Payments sheet of this judgment.
The defendant must comply with the standard conditions that have been adopted by this court as well as with any additional
conditions in this judgment.
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1) The defendant shall not leave the judicial district without permission of the court or probation officer;
2) The defendant shall report to the probation officer, and shall submit a truthful and complete written report within the first five
days of each month;
3) The defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer;
4) The defendant shall support his or her dependants and meet other family responsibilities;
5) The defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or
other acceptable reasons;
6) The defendant shall notify the probation officer at least ten days prior to any change in residence or employment;
7) The defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any
controlled substance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substances, except as prescribed by a physician;
The defendant shall not frequent places where controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered;
9) The defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged in criminal activity, and shall not associate with any person
convicted of a felony unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer;
10) The defendant shall permit a probation officer to visit him or her at any time at home or elsewhere, and shall permit confiscation
of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer;
11) The defendant shall notify the probation officer within seventy-two hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement
officer;
12) The defendant shall not enter into any agreement to act as an informer or a special agent of a law enforcement agency without the
permission of the Court; and
13) As directed by the probation officer, the defendant shall notify third parties of risks that may be occasioned by the defendant's
criminal record or personal history or characteristics, and shall permit the probation officer to make such notifications and to
confirm the defendant's compliance with such notification requirement.
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 596 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 3 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 3 - Supervised Release
DEFENDANT: KURT F. JOHNSON Judgment - Page 4 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-002 WHA
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION
1) The defendant shall not own or possess any firearms, ammunition, destructive devices, or other dangerous
weapons and shall not be present in a vehicle where the defendant knows any firearm or ammunition is present.
2) Unless directed in writing otherwise, the defendant shall check his voicemail and/or answering machine on a
daily basis to determine if any instructions were left by the probation officer. The defendant shall follow all such
instructions, including but not limited to drug testing.
3) The defendant shall pay any restitution and special assessment that is imposed by this judgment, and that
remains unpaid at the commencement of the term of supervised release.
4) The defendant shall provide the probation officer access to any requested financial information, including
tax returns, and shall authorize the probation office to conduct credit checks and obtain copies of income tax
returns.
5) The defendant shall not be employed in any capacity in which he owns, manages, operates, or participates in
any business, without the prior approval of the probation officer.
6) The defendant shall participate in a mental health treatment program, as directed by the probation officer.
The defendant is to pay part or all costs of this treatment, at an amount not to exceed the cost of treatment, as
deemed appropriate by the probation officer. Payments shall never exceed the total cost of mental health
counseling. The actual co-payment schedule shall be determined by the probation officer.
7) The defendant shall submit his person, residence, office, vehicle, or any property under his control to a
search. Such a search shall be conducted by a United States Probation Officer at a reasonable time and in a
reasonable manner, based upon reasonable suspicion of contraband or evidence of a violation of a condition of
release. Failure to submit to such a search may be grounds for revocation; the defendant shall warn any
residents that the premises may be subject to searches.
The defendant shall not possess or use any computer, however, he may, with the prior approval of the
probation officer, use a computer in connection with authorized employment and/or education.
9) The defendant shall not have contact with any co-defendant, in this case namely, Scott Dale Heineman,
William F. Julian, Farrel J. LeCccompte, Jr., Sara J. Magoon, and Charles Dewey.
10) The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer.
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 596 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 4 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) - Judgment in a Criminal Case - sheet 6 - Schedule of Payments
DEFENDANT: KURT F. JOHNSON Judgment - Page 5 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-002 WHA
* Findings for the total amount of losses are required under Chapters 109A, 110, 110A, and 113A of Title 18 for offenses committed on or after September 13, 1994,
but before April 23, 1996.
CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES
The defendant must pay the total criminal monetary penalties under the schedule of payments on Sheet 6.
Assessment Fine Restitution
Totals: $ 3,500 $ $
[x] The determination of restitution is deferred until June 10, 2008 . An Amended Judgment in a Criminal Case
(AO 245C) will be entered after such determination.
[ ] The defendant shall make restitution (including community restitution) to the following payees in the
amount listed below.
If the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall receive an approximately proportional payment
unless specified otherwise in the priority order or percentage payment column below. However, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3664(i), all nonfederal victims must be paid before the United States is paid.
Name of Payee Total Loss* Restitution Ordered Priority or Percentage
Totals: $ $
[ ] Restitution amount ordered pursuant to plea agreement $
[ ] The defendant must pay interest on restitution and a fine of more than $2,500, unless the restitution or fine
is paid in full before the fifteenth day after the date of the judgment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f). All
of the payment options on Sheet 6, may be subject to penalties for delinquency and default, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3612(g).
[ ] The court determined that the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest, and it is ordered that:
[ ] the interest requirement is waived for the [ ] fine [ ] restitution.
[ ] the interest requirement for the [ ] fine [ ] restitution is modified as follows:
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 596 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 5 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) - Judgment in a Criminal Case - sheet 6 - Schedule of Payments
DEFENDANT: KURT F. JOHNSON Judgment - Page 6 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-002 WHA
Payments shall be applied in the following order: (1) assessment, (2) restitution principal, (3) restitution interest, (4) fine principal, (5) fine interest, (6) community
restitution, (7) penalties, and (8) costs, including cost of prosecution and court costs.
SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS
Having assessed the defendant's ability to pay, payment of the total criminal monetary penalties are due as
follows:
A [ ] Lump sum payment of $ due immediately, balance due
[ ] not later than , or
[ ] in accordance with ( ) C, ( ) D, ( ) E or ( ) F below; or
B [x] Payment to begin immediately (may be combined with ( ) C, ( ) D, or ( x) F below); or
C [ ] Payment in equal (e.g. weekly, monthly, quarterly) installments of $ over a period of (e.g., months
or years), to commence (e.g., 30 or 60 days) after the date of this judgment; or
D [ ] Payment in equal (e.g. weekly, monthly, quarterly) installments of $ over a period of (e.g., months
or years), to commence (e.g., 30 or 60 days) after release from imprisonment to a term of supervision;
or
E [ ] Payment during the term of supervised release will commence within (e,g, 30 or 60 days) after release
from imprisonment. The court will set the payment plan based on an assessment of the defendant's ability
to pay at that time; or
F [x] Special instructions regarding the payment of criminal monetary penalties:
It is further ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $3,500, which shall
be due immediately. While incarcerated, payment of criminal monetary penalties are due during imprisonment at
the rate of not less than $25 per quarter and payment shall be through the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial
Responsibility Program. Criminal monetary payments shall be made to the Clerk of U.S. District Court, 450 Golden
Gate Ave., Box 36060, San Francisco, CA 94102.
The defendant shall pay restitution, which shall be due immediately, to the victims and in the amounts
determined by the Court.
While incarcerated, payment of restitution is due during imprisonment at the rate of not less than $25 per
quarter and payment shall be through the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. Restitution
payments shall be made to the Clerk of U.S. District Court, Attention: Financial Unit, 450 Golden Gate Ave., Box
36060, San Francisco, CA 94102. The defendant's restitution obligation shall be paid jointly and severally with
other defendants in this case until full restitution is paid.
Unless the court has expressly ordered otherwise, if this judgment imposes imprisonment, payment of criminal
monetary penalties is due during imprisonment. All criminal monetary penalties, except those payments made
through the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, are made to the clerk of the court.
The defendant shall receive credit for all payments previously made toward any criminal monetary penalties
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 596 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 6 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) - Judgment in a Criminal Case - sheet 6 - Schedule of Payments
DEFENDANT: KURT F. JOHNSON Judgment - Page 7 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-002 WHA
Payments shall be applied in the following order: (1) assessment, (2) restitution principal, (3) restitution interest, (4) fine principal, (5) fine interest, (6) community
restitution, (7) penalties, and (8) costs, including cost of prosecution and court costs.
imposed.
[x] Joint and Several
Defendant and codefendant
Names
Case Numbers
(including
defendant number)
Total Amount Joint and Several
Amount
Corresponding
Payee (if
appropriate)
Dale S. Heineman CR05-0611-01
William Julian CR05-0611-07
Farrel LeCompte
Jr.
CR05-0611-08
[ ] The defendant shall pay the cost of prosecution.
[ ] The defendant shall pay the following court cost(s):
[x ] The defendant shall forfeit the defendant's interest in the following property to the United States:
1) The U.S. currency in the amount of $178,000, which was seized from Bank of America account
#776234677; and
2) The U.S. currency in the amount of $50,000, which was seized from Bank of America account #05808-
10223.
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 596 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 7 of 7







United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN
JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE
USDC Case Number: CR-05-00611-001 WHA
BOP Case Number: DCAN305CR000611-001
USM Number: 12152-081
Defendant's Attorney: Pro Per
THE DEFENDANT:
[ ] pleaded guilty to count(s): .
[ ] pleaded nolo contendere to count(s) which was accepted by the court.
[x] was found guilty on count(s) 1, 2 through 5, 9 through 14, 19 through 25, 33, 34, 38 through 52 of the Superseding Indictment
after a plea of not guilty.
The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these offense(s):
Title & Section Nature of Offense
Offense
Ended Count
U.S.C. § 1349 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MAIL FRAUD 1
U.S.C. § 1341 MAIL FRAUD 2 through 5,
9 through 14,
19 through 25,
33, 34,
38 through 52
The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 7 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the
Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
[ ] The defendant has been found not guilty on count(s) .
[ ] Count(s) (is)(are) dismissed on the motion of the United States.
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name,
residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered
to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of any material changes in economic circumstances.
March 18, 2008
Date of Imposition of Judgment
Signature of Judicial Officer
Honorable William Alsup, U. S. District Judge
Name & Title of Judicial Officer
March 19, 2008
Date
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 594 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) (CAND Rev. 3/07) Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 2 - Imprisonment
DEFENDANT: DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN Judgment - Page 2 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-001 WHA
IMPRISONMENT
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be
imprisoned for a total term of 260 months . This term consists of 240 months on Count One to run
consecutively with 20 months on Counts Two through Five, Nine through Fourteen, Nineteen through Twentyfive,
Thirty-three, Thirty-four, and Thirty-eight through Fifty-two, all counts to be served concurrently.
[x] The Court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons:
Court strongly recommends the defendant be designated to a separate facility from co-defendant Kurt Johnson.
[x] The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. The appearance bond is hereby
exonerated.
[ ] The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district.
[ ] at [] am [] pm on .
[ ] as notified by the United States Marshal.
The appearance bond shall be deemed exonerated upon the surrender of the defendant.
[ ] The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of
Prisons:
[ ] before 2:00 pm on .
[ ] as notified by the United States Marshal.
[ ] as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.
The appearance bond shall be deemed exonerated upon the surrender of the defendant.
RETURN
I have executed this judgment as follows:
Defendant delivered on to
at , with a certified copy of this judgment.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL
By
Deputy United States Marshal
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 594 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 2 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 3 - Supervised Release
DEFENDANT: DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN Judgment - Page 3 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-001 WHA
SUPERVISED RELEASE
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be on supervised release for a term of 5 years . This term consists of 5
years on each of Counts One through Five, Nine through Fourteen, Nineteen through Twenty-five, Thirty-three, Thirty-four, and
Thirty-eight through Fifty-two, all such terms to run concurrently.
The defendant must report to the probation office in the district to which the defendant is released within 72 hours of release from the
custody of the Bureau of Prisons.
The defendant shall not commit another federal, state or local crime.
The defendant shall not unlawfully possess a controlled substance. The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled
substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and two periodic drug tests
thereafter.
[ ] The above drug testing condition is suspended based on the court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future
substance abuse. (Check if applicable.)
[x] The defendant shall not possess a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or any other dangerous weapon. (Check if
applicable.)
[x] The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer. (Check if applicable.)
[ ] The defendant shall register with the state sex offender registration agency in the state where the defendant resides, works, or
is a student, as directed by the probation officer. (Check if applicable.)
[ ] The defendant shall participate in an approved program for domestic violence. (Check if applicable.)
If this judgment imposes a fine or restitution, it is a condition of supervised release that the defendant pay in accordance with
the Schedule of Payments sheet of this judgment.
The defendant must comply with the standard conditions that have been adopted by this court as well as with any additional
conditions in this judgment.
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1) The defendant shall not leave the judicial district without permission of the court or probation officer;
2) The defendant shall report to the probation officer, and shall submit a truthful and complete written report within the first five
days of each month;
3) The defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer;
4) The defendant shall support his or her dependants and meet other family responsibilities;
5) The defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or
other acceptable reasons;
6) The defendant shall notify the probation officer at least ten days prior to any change in residence or employment;
7) The defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any
controlled substance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substances, except as prescribed by a physician;
The defendant shall not frequent places where controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered;
9) The defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged in criminal activity, and shall not associate with any person
convicted of a felony unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer;
10) The defendant shall permit a probation officer to visit him or her at any time at home or elsewhere, and shall permit confiscation
of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer;
11) The defendant shall notify the probation officer within seventy-two hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement
officer;
12) The defendant shall not enter into any agreement to act as an informer or a special agent of a law enforcement agency without the
permission of the Court; and
13) As directed by the probation officer, the defendant shall notify third parties of risks that may be occasioned by the defendant's
criminal record or personal history or characteristics, and shall permit the probation officer to make such notifications and to
confirm the defendant's compliance with such notification requirement.
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 594 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 3 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 3 - Supervised Release
DEFENDANT: DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN Judgment - Page 4 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-001 WHA
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION
1) The defendant shall not own or possess any firearms, ammunition, destructive devices, or other dangerous
weapons and shall not be present in a vehicle where the defendant knows any firearm or ammunition is present.
2) Unless directed in writing otherwise, the defendant shall check his voicemail and/or answering machine on a
daily basis to determine if any instructions were left by the probation officer. The defendant shall follow all such
instruction, including but not limited to drug testing.
3) The defendant shall pay any restitution and special assessment that is imposed by this judgment and that remains
unpaid at the commencement of the term of supervised release.
4) The defendant shall provide the probation officer with access to any financial information, including tax returns,
and shall authorize the probation officer to conduct credit checks and obtain copies of income tax returns.
5) The defendant shall not be employed in any capacity in which he owns, manages, operates, or participates in any
business, without the prior approval of the probation officer.
6) The defendant shall participate in a mental health treatment program, as directed by the probation officer. The defendant
is to pay part or all costs of this treatment, at an amount not to exceed the cost of treatment, as deemed appropriate by the
probation officer. Payments shall never exceed the total cost of mental health counseling. The actual co-payment schedule
shall be determined by the probation officer.
7) The defendant shall submit his person, residence, office, vehicle, or any property under his control to a search.
Such a search shall be conducted by a United States Probation Officer at a reasonable time and in a reasonable
manner, based upon reasonable suspicion of contraband or evidence of a violation of a condition of release. Failure
to submit to such a search may be grounds for revocation; the defendant shall warn any residents that the premises
may be subject to searches.
The defendant shall not possess or use any computer; however, he may, with the prior approval of the probation
officer, use a computer in connection with authorized employment and/or education.
9) The defendant shall not have contact with any co-defendant, in this case namely, Kurt F. Johnson, William F.
Julian, Farrel J. LeCompte, Jr., Sara J. Magoon, and Charles Dewey Tobias.
10) The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer.
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 594 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 4 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) - Judgment in a Criminal Case - sheet 6 - Schedule of Payments
DEFENDANT: DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN Judgment - Page 5 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-001 WHA
* Findings for the total amount of losses are required under Chapters 109A, 110, 110A, and 113A of Title 18 for offenses committed on or after September 13, 1994,
but before April 23, 1996.
CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES
The defendant must pay the total criminal monetary penalties under the schedule of payments on Sheet 6.
Assessment Fine Restitution
Totals: $ 3,500 $ $
[x] The determination of restitution is deferred until June 10, 2008 . An Amended Judgment in a Criminal Case
(AO 245C) will be entered after such determination.
[ ] The defendant shall make restitution (including community restitution) to the following payees in the amount
listed below.
If the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall receive an approximately proportional payment
unless specified otherwise in the priority order or percentage payment column below. However, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3664(i), all nonfederal victims must be paid before the United States is paid.
Name of Payee Total Loss* Restitution Ordered Priority or Percentage
Totals: $ $
[ ] Restitution amount ordered pursuant to plea agreement $
[ ] The defendant must pay interest on restitution and a fine of more than $2,500, unless the restitution or fine is
paid in full before the fifteenth day after the date of the judgment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f). All of the
payment options on Sheet 6, may be subject to penalties for delinquency and default, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
3612(g).
[ ] The court determined that the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest, and it is ordered that:
[ ] the interest requirement is waived for the [ ] fine [ ] restitution.
[ ] the interest requirement for the [ ] fine [ ] restitution is modified as follows:
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 594 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 5 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) - Judgment in a Criminal Case - sheet 6 - Schedule of Payments
DEFENDANT: DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN Judgment - Page 6 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-001 WHA
Payments shall be applied in the following order: (1) assessment, (2) restitution principal, (3) restitution interest, (4) fine principal, (5) fine interest, (6) community
restitution, (7) penalties, and (8) costs, including cost of prosecution and court costs.
SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS
Having assessed the defendant's ability to pay, payment of the total criminal monetary penalties are due as
follows:
A [ ] Lump sum payment of $ due immediately, balance due
[ ] not later than , or
[ ] in accordance with ( ) C, ( ) D, ( ) E or ( ) F below; or
B [x] Payment to begin immediately (may be combined with ( ) C, ( ) D, or ( x) F below); or
C [ ] Payment in equal (e.g. weekly, monthly, quarterly) installments of $ over a period of (e.g., months
or years), to commence (e.g., 30 or 60 days) after the date of this judgment; or
D [ ] Payment in equal (e.g. weekly, monthly, quarterly) installments of $ over a period of (e.g., months
or years), to commence (e.g., 30 or 60 days) after release from imprisonment to a term of supervision;
or
E [ ] Payment during the term of supervised release will commence within (e,g, 30 or 60 days) after release
from imprisonment. The court will set the payment plan based on an assessment of the defendant's ability
to pay at that time; or
F [x] Special instructions regarding the payment of criminal monetary penalties:
It is further ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $3,500 which shall
be due immediately. While incarcerated, payment of criminal monetary penalties are due during imprisonment at
the rate of not less than $25 per quarter and payment shall be through the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial
Responsibility Program. Criminal monetary payments shall be made to the Clerk of U.S. District Court, 450 Golden
Gate Ave., Box 36060, San Francisco, CA 94102.
The defendant shall pay restitution, which shall be due immediately, to the victims and in the amounts
determined by the Court.
While incarcerated, payment of restitution is due during imprisonment at he rate of not less than $25 per quarter
and payment shall be through the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. Restitution payments
shall be made to the Clerk of U.S. District Court, Attention: Financial Unit, 450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36060, San
Francisco, CA 94102. The defendant's restitution obligation shall be paid jointly and severally with other
defendants in this case until full restitution is paid.
Unless the court has expressly ordered otherwise, if this judgment imposes imprisonment, payment of criminal
monetary penalties is due during imprisonment. All criminal monetary penalties, except those payments made
through the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, are made to the clerk of the court.
The defendant shall receive credit for all payments previously made toward any criminal monetary penalties
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 594 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 6 of 7
AO 245B (Rev. 12/03) - Judgment in a Criminal Case - sheet 6 - Schedule of Payments
DEFENDANT: DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN Judgment - Page 7 of 7
CASE NUMBER: CR-05-00611-001 WHA
Payments shall be applied in the following order: (1) assessment, (2) restitution principal, (3) restitution interest, (4) fine principal, (5) fine interest, (6) community
restitution, (7) penalties, and (8) costs, including cost of prosecution and court costs.
imposed.
[x] Joint and Several
Defendant and codefendant
Names
Case Numbers
(including
defendant number)
Total Amount Joint and Several
Amount
Corresponding
Payee (if
appropriate)
Kurt Johnson CR05-0611-02
William Julian CR05-0611-07
Farrel LeCompte,
Jr.
CR05-0611-08
[ ] The defendant shall pay the cost of prosecution.
[ ] The defendant shall pay the following court cost(s):
[x] The defendant shall forfeit the defendant's interest in the following property to the United States:
1) The U.S. currency in the amount of $178,000, which was seized from Bank of America account
#776234677; and
2) The U.S. currency in the amount of $50,000, which was seized from Bank of America account #05808-
10223.
Case 3:05-cr-00611-WHA Document 594 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 7 of 7




UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM F. JULIAN,
Defendant.
))))))))))))
No. CR 05-0611–7 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE COUNTS TWO
THROUGH EIGHT OF THE
SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT
Based upon the government's motion filed on March 18, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
THAT Counts Two through Eight of the Superseding Indictment in the above-captioned
action are dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Counts Two through Eight are dismissed only
with respect to Defendant William Franklin Julian and this order shall not affect the charges as
they pertain to any other codefendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March ___, 2008
HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

[Demosthenes]

United States Attorney Joseph P. Russoniello
Northern District of California
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 20, 2008
http://WWW.USDOJ.GOV/USAO/CAN

FOUNDERS OF NATIONWIDE DEBT ELIMINATION SCHEME SENTENCED

SAN FRANCISCO – United States Attorney Joseph P. Russoniello announced that Kurt F. Johnson, 45, of Sunnyvale, California, and Dale Scott Heineman, 48, of Union City, California, were sentenced on March 18, 2008 for orchestrating a nationwide debt elimination scheme. Mr. Johnson was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment and Mr. Heineman was sentenced to 21 years, 8 months imprisonment. The sentences were handed down by United States District Court Judge William Alsup after both defendants were convicted by a jury of multiple counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud.

From 2003 to 2005, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Heineman operated as the Dorean Group from offices in Union City and Newark, California. Together they orchestrated a mortgage elimination scheme whereby fraudulent documents were recorded as part of their clients’ titles to make it appear as though mortgage lenders’ secured interests in the properties were canceled when, in fact, the corresponding mortgage and home equity loans had not been fully repaid. At the direction of the Dorean Group, some of its clients used these fraudulently-generated “free and clear” titles to obtain hundreds of thousands of dollars in new home equity loans from lenders who were led to believe that the properties were unencumbered by loans. Clients who obtained new loans paid 50-75% of the funds to the Dorean Group. At least 20 lenders and as many as 3,500 homeowners throughout 35 states were victimized by Mr. Johnson, Mr. Heineman, and the Dorean Group.

On September 22, 2005, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Heineman were indicted by a grand jury. On November 14, 2007, following a four-week trial, a jury returned guilty verdicts on one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and thirty-four separate counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341.

A Dorean Group “broker” charged with participating in the conspiracy was also sentenced along with Mr. Heineman and Mr. Johnson. In August 2007, William Julian, 44, of Cayce, South Carolina, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud, and bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. On March 18, 2008, Mr. Julian was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.

A hearing for final determination of restitution is scheduled for June 10, 2008.
Assistant United States Attorney C. David Hall and Special Assistant United States Attorney Brigid S. Martin are the attorneys prosecuting this case with the assistance of paralegals Christine Tian and Sabah Khan. The convictions and sentences are the result of a three-year investigation by FBI Special Agents Kathia Harp, Spiro Stamos, Emmanuel Pascua, Matthew Ernst, and Holly Erickson.

[wserra]

Mr. Johnson was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment and Mr. Heineman was sentenced to 21 years, 8 months imprisonment.

Ohhh. Just say no.

[Judge Roy Bean]

What a long, strange trip it's been.

I wouldn't suggest anyone wade through Johnson's blog, but there are parts of it that demonstrate just how far a promoter will go to make it look like what he's doing has real meaning. What might be even more interesting are the documents that weren't made available on PACER.

If you weed out the thousands of lines of religious diatribe and self-agrandizing ego-babble, the conglomeration of goofy legal nonsense laid out in their defense tactics includes bits and pieces of just about every nutball scheme the various promoters and proponents have ever come up with. Johnson, at least according to LeCompte, was "a student" of Roger Elvick at some point in time, but the whole thing is so far fetched that I still wonder if, beginning from the time they were arrested, they weren't simply having fun at the Court's expense.

If nothing else, the case should serve to speed up the demise of other debt elimination schemes and should be a useful lesson in how not to try and run a pro se "defense."

[Dr. Caligari]

If you weed out the thousands of lines of religious diatribe and self-agrandizing ego-babble, the conglomeration of goofy legal nonsense laid out in their defense tactics includes bits and pieces of just about every nutball scheme the various promoters and proponents have ever come up with. Johnson, at least according to LeCompte, was "a student" of Roger Elvick at some point in time, but the whole thing is so far fetched that I still wonder if, beginning from the time they were arrested, they weren't simply having fun at the Court's expense.

My favorite was when they signed the judge's name to a "court order" directing that they be released, and filed it in the court's docket. I think that stunt cost them their access to computers.

[Judge Roy Bean]

If memory serves, they had the opportunity last summer to plead out and take something like 8 and 7 years respectively, but they would have had to admit they were guilty of the counts and not with some commercial contract agreement they had tried to foist on the court.

A quick estimate as of say, September 2007 (given they had been in Federal custody for about two years at that time), would mean Kurt would have been facing 6 more years and Scott only 5 more.

I guess it was just too exciting to keep playing whacko lawyer.