Section 93
-
- Tupa-O-Quatloosia
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
- Location: Brea, CA
Re: Section 93
And as to whether pigs raised on wire mesh so their feet never touch the ground are "birds" for the purpose of Jewish dietary law....
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
Re: Section 93
Nope, because unlike your type we realize that such a quote serves to make a very valid point, turkey is to ham, as ham is to turkey; one is not the other, nor does combining them both serve to make them one in the same.grixit wrote:I read about a product labelling case once. A maker of turkey ham wanted to be allowed to skip the turkey part and just label it "ham". The judge quoted Lewis Carroll "...and whether pigs have wings", before stating that they in fact don't, and denying the petition.
By TP logic, that makes Lewis Carroll part of our code of law.
Which means you can make words mean what you want them to say.
But so can the judge.
-
- Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am
Re: Section 93
107 posts. Locky-locky. Time to start a new thread, folks.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie