Quatloos! The views herein are not those of Quatloosia Publishing LLC -- Legal Issues Fax to 877-698-0678 and admin issues to sooltauq [at] gmail.com
Skip to content
Post by ASITStands » Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:13 pm
Dezcad wrote:Sounds good to me, the defendant should be the final arbiter of his competence ...
Post by ASITStands » Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:14 pm
grixit wrote:Wiberg identified himself as addressing the case against DANIEL RILEY, but he refers to Daniel Riley as the defendant, a clear case of New World Order verbal sleight of hand.
Return to “Public Archives -- Read Only”