Captainkickback hasnt a clue

[Joey Smith]

Nobody who matters believes that there is some sort of non-federal citizen (other than a non-resident alien, i.e., a Japanese tourist in Vegas on a lark) that is not subject to federal income taxes. Those who have rejected such an asinine theory include:

The U.S. Supreme Court, all the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, and all the U.S. District Courts to have considered the matter; and

All accredited legal and constitutional scholars who have considered the issue.

There is nobody who matters who has considered and not rejected the theory as totally false.

[Kimokeo]

"3. Do you understand why the phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was written into the 14th amendment. (Its related very close the question 1 above.) Yes, the 14th Amendment ensured that the Supreme Court could not reverse the gains and rights given to blacks as a result of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 - which was vetoed and the veto overridden. The courts can overturn legislation, but not amendments."


The courts can overturn amendments. They would face impeachment for it, but they could.

So, the question would be, if the Supreme Court overturned an amendment in their decision, and the Congress removed the idiots, would the SC decision still stand?