David Merrill wrote:John J. Bulten wrote:David Merrill wrote:You poor taxpayers. But thanks. For now, your ignorance is holding the whole thing together for the international bankers. Those poor bankers - all they have is money.
So well stated, David! It's really funny that the bankers prefer debt to redemption.
Hey, can you give me a little context on this scooter-Jesus-King-Arthur thing, if you have a moment? Perhaps someone linked it and I missed it in the frivolity.
Not just the bankers! Or morelike the right to endorse fractionalizing debt extends to private individuals to become individual private bankers [FRNs are themselves redeemable stock certificates*]. I doubt Pete knows a remedy to defer payment of the Return of Income required - as he is presumed represented in Congress:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publication ... 7rank.html
I hear Secretary Henry Merritt is in China begging them to quit devaluing the Renmindi. Like he and Alan never saw it coming; this day when they would have to realistically think about the account deficit - China at the top and the US at the bottom - two years after China unpegged from the US dollar for its exchange rate.
This just in, talking of debt:
PRESS RELEASE OF THE PARIS CLUB ON THE THREATS POSED BY SOME LITIGATING CREDITORS TO HEAVILY INDEBTED POOR COUNTRIES
Public attention has recently focused on the behaviour of creditors resorting to aggressive litigation tactics against heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC). These actions freeride on the debt cancellation granted by other creditors and thus divert resources from poverty reduction expenditures in the debtor country.
Paris Club creditors recall that they are committed to the full implementation of the HIPC initiative. They urge all official and commercial creditors and debtor countries to take the necessary steps to implement this initiative.
In particular, consistent with the Paris Club principle of comparability of treatment and taking stock of the harmful consequences of litigation for HIPC countries, Paris Club creditors confirm that they are committed to avoid selling their claims on HIPC countries to other creditors who do not intend to provide debt relief under the HIPC initiative, and urge other creditors to follow suit.
In cooperation with relevant international institutions, Paris Club creditors have agreed to intensify their work on this issue with a view to identify concrete measures to tackle this problem.
Background notes
1. The Paris Club was formed in 1956. It is an informal group of creditor governments from major industrialized countries. It meets on a monthly basis in Paris with debtor countries in order to agree with them on restructuring their debts.
2. The members of the Paris Club are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, the Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
So the whole game is getting shaky.
If you still agree to disagree about your name being John J. Bulton (instead of John J------; like wserra is Wesley Marc but thinks he is Wesley M. Serra) you will not understand the redemption that cured on September 11, 2001. The Quatlosers are happy to link you to old sensationalism from a washed out reporter and that really suffices if you understand Protectionism, Denial and the general dissociation from reality I enjoy studying here. (Should Demo cut-and-paste the article again, you will realize the truth about my
not actually suing Jesus near the end of the article. She just grabbed that case title to get the readers' attention.)
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/BOE1.gif
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/BOE2.gif
The docket of the case; which I am sure Demosthenes will be glad to post, tells of the Manhattan Judgment a week later. That
in rem case had a map of Manhattan Island included and the initial refusal to file it Registered Mail was returned to a suitor (strangely enough, in a separate case) postmarked September 12, so I suspect that the clerk of court was making that judgment as the Towers were under attack. A week later the clerk of court escorted me past security to get the Manhattan Judgment filed.
It is all about redemption and that is the most offensive item for the bankers, even all the Quatlosers as private bankers.
As far as the whole scooter-Jesus-King Arthur thing goes, we have a summary in Wesley Marc admitting he knows his Christian or given name and as an attorney, understands his right to adopt the Wesley M. SERRA a vessel in commerce.
http://www.clubdeparis.org
The delegation of Sierra Leone was headed by Mr. John O. BENJAMIN, Minister of Finance. The meeting was chaired by Mr. Ambroise FAYOLLE, Co-Chairman of the Paris Club, Assistant Secretary at the Treasury and Economic Policy Department of the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry.
Inherently he admits I have the same right to a legal name; or not to construct one...
You might consider that the Masons think that factions of the original Knights Templar survived in organizations that positively connect to the Order's modern Templars. If you understand that while reading any good history book, the history of debt becomes clear - too bad the Chinese were onto it so early compared to the USA.
http://goldismoney.info/forums/attachme ... 1176137303
Notice the form for signing the non-endorsement of private credit; to redeem lawful money according to Title 12 U.S.C. §411. "True Name dba [First M. Last]"
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... cMoney.wmv
That right of redemption being a matter of banking law makes little difference to the Quatlosers and that makes them so boring, so run-of-the-mill that I find it captivating.
Regards,
David Merrill.
* Outside the scope of supersedeas bonding that keeps the co-counterfeiter in criminal syndicalism out of jail, they can only be viewed as insurance policies and that is of course where the admiralty comes into play.
Delovio v. Boit 1815. And there is a great teatise about the Knights Templar by Justice Story.
NICE! 
