Ed and Elaine full colon Brown

[Arthur Rubin]

http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/brown2_34.pdf

Can't he figure out how to get a copyright symbol out of that typewriter? c <backspace> O often works.

[Judge Roy Bean]

It would appear that someone prepared the documents afterwhich Ed and Elaine made some corrections and annotations and then signed them.

[Nikki]

It's a shame {other than for the innate humor} that One:family Stupid didn't catch the typo in the Affidavit of Specific Negative Averment:

"... that the following fats [sic] are true, correct, and complete ..."

Are they, perchance, referring to heads?

[LOBO]

One IS the lonliest number.

[Demosthenes]

03/16/2009 38 NOTICE of Acceptance for Value, etc. of Minute Entry, Orders, Notice of Hearing, Exhibit List by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown. (dae) (Entered: 03/16/2009)

http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/brown2_38.pdf

[Nikki]

Totally bogus. Wrong color crayon and slanted in the wrong direction.

[ASITStands]

What's the effect of "Accepting for Value" an Order granting your Motion for Continuance?

And, what's the purpose of "Accepting for Value" an Order granting your own motion?

I suppose the Court will simply DENY as frivolous and STRIKE the documents. However, it'd be nice if the Court adds something telling the peanut gallery why these filings are frivolous.

Or, adds some explanation why these filings are a complete waste of time for the Parties.

[webhick]

Those account numbers that E&E handwrote...they look like social security numbers.

[.]

My assumption was that you had arranged for a chicken trained to walk diagonally on paper to be smuggled in knowing that E&E would use it to look like bigger fools than usual.

[LPC]

Those account numbers that E&E handwrote...they look like social security numbers.

Great. We now have all the information we need to steal an identity that's not worth anything.

[webhick]

My assumption was that you had arranged for a chicken trained to walk diagonally on paper to be smuggled in knowing that E&E would use it to look like bigger fools than usual.

Bah! The chicken is trained to draw a straight line using a ruler. It's a such a waste because I had already trained the chicken to recite the dictionary backwards and since the incompetent humans couldn't manage to write in a straight line, I had to re-train the chicken to draw lines for them. Now it appears that the dumbasses released their social security numbers to the general public. I guess next time I'll also have to train snails to leave a trail of slime along the lines that dry into words. I've determined that it would be more cost-effective this way, due to the unfortunate incident following the ten hour training course "How to Pick Your Belly Button Lint."

[Demosthenes]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE BROWN
Cr. No. 09-30-GZS

Government’s Response to Paragraph 5 of Defendants’
“Notice of Continuance” (document # 26)

On March 11, 2009, the Court held a Status Conference at which the Court instructed the
government to file a written response to what it later referred to as “the Defendants’ Motion to Prepare and Defend contained in pleading 26” in the Docket Text: Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge George Z. Singal in Portland, Maine: Status Conference as to Edward Brown, Elaine Brown held on 3/11/2009.

Pleading 26, which was titled “Notice of Continuance,” was, in essence, a Motion to Continue, which the Court has ruled upon. However, the Motion also contained, at paragraph 5, the following allegations:

5. The Edward-Lewis: Brown© and the Elaine-Alice: Brown© have had to date one (1) hour per day beginning February 25, 2009 in which to confer; have had no resources; are allowed only three (3) stamps per week for mailings; no phone calls, including phone calls to attorneys; placed in maximum security, locked down 23/7; received no discovery; allowed no visitors;

The government responds as follows.

The defendants have been allowed to meet on the following dates during the following times: 2/26/09, 1:00 pm to 2:15 pm; 2/27/09, 9:05 am to 10:15 am; 2/28/09, 9:20 am to 10:35 am; 3/1/09, 9:30 am to 10:00 am; 3/2/09, 7:25 am to 10:00 am; 3/3/09, 7:20 am to 9:00 am; 3/4/09, 8:10 am to 10:20 am; 3/5/09, 8:35 am to 10:40 am; 3/6/09, 7:30 am to 10:30 am; 3/7/09, 9:30 am to 12:30 pm; 3/8/09, 9:30 am to 12:00 noon; 3/9/09, 7:15 am to 12:00 noon; 3/10/09, 7:10 am to 11:15 am; 3/11/09, 1:20 pm to 2:45 pm; 3/12/09, 7:50 am to 10:50 am; 3/13/09, 7:10 am to 10:30 am; 3/16/09, 7:40 am to 10:45 am; 3/17/09, 7:30 am to 11:00 am; and 3/18/09, 7:10 am to 11:00 am.

The defendants have been provided with: 1) access to what is known as the Strafford County Law Library and have been instruction on how to access state and federal law databases on the library system since 2/26/09. On 2/26/09 the defendants requested information on the Uniform Commercial Code and they were directed to the NH-UCC Chapters in the NH Revised Statutes Annotated database); 2) access to word processing on a computer since 3/2/09 and the ability to have documents they have typed printed; 3) a copy of Black’s Law Dictionary on 3/1/09; 4) 20 #10 mailing envelopes on 3/4/09; 5) a substantial amount of legal materials on 3/5/09 which Edward Brown had requested be sent to him from the Federal Prison in Marion, IL where he had been an inmate; 6) three legal pads on 3/16/09 ; 7) a typewriter which was moved into the computer room on 3/16/09 for the defendants’ use on 3/17/09; 8) eight manilla mailers on 3/17/09; 9) red pens, as requested by each defendant on 3/13/09; and, 10) a box of legal materials on 3/18/09 which had been sent to Elaine Brown from the Federal Prison in Carswell, Texas where she had been an inmate.

Since March 11, 2009, the defendants have been housed in the General Housing Unit of the Strafford County Jail and have been afforded privileges according to the Strafford County Jail standard operating procedures for individuals held in general population. Those privileges include visitor, telephone and mailing privileges. The defendants will be afforded unlimited visitation with their respective stand-by counsel of record in this case. All outgoing mail matter identified by the defendants as legal mail has been, and will be, mailed by the Jail at no cost to the defendants. The postage for all other mail must be paid the defendants. Each has access to their respective commissary accounts to pay for postage and each has money in their respective commissary account.

As for discovery, as the government has previously advised the Court, the defendants have refused to accept discovery provided by the government. Multiple attempts have been made to deliver the discovery material to the defendants but they have continued to refuse to accept the discovery. Six days after the Status Conference of March 11, 2009, on March 17, 2009, personnel at the Jail again attempted to deliver the discovery material produced by the government to the defendants but they each declined to accept either the laptop or the printed materials.

March 20, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
Michael J. Gunnison
Acting United States Attorney
By: /s/ Arnold H. Huftalen
Arnold H. Huftalen
Assistant U.S. Attorney
N.H. Bar Assoc. No. 1215
53 Pleasant Street, 4th Floor
Concord, New Hampshire

[Dezcad]

9) red pens, as requested by each defendant on 3/13/09;

Does that mean they already had red crayons? Or have they made a strategical error in asking for pens and not crayons?

[Judge Roy Bean]

I suspect they want more one-cent stamps not for mailing but to affix to their documents.

[The Observer]

...6) three legal pads on 3/16/09 ;...

Hmmmm, is that a glimmer of reason we see in the Brown camp? This is the closest they have come to building a valid legal defense.

[Imalawman]

She's totally confused. Not only did she leave off the stamps, but she didn't attached a notice of dishonor. It's like she's not even trying anymore...sigh....

[Dezcad]

Among the many recent filings of E+E, I include #48 below.

03/26/2009 43 NOTICE of Endorsed Orders marked "Refused for cause without dishonor:" etc. by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown. (dae) (Entered: 03/26/2009)
03/26/2009 44 NOTICE of Refusal of Court-Appointed Counsel by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown. (dae) (Entered: 03/26/2009)
03/26/2009 45 Notice and Demand that the US Attorney and the Court Dismiss charges against Debtors Edward Brown and Elaine Brown (docketed as MOTION to Dismiss Charges) by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown. Served on 3/26/09 via CM/ECF docketing. Follow up on Objection on 4/13/2009. (dae) (Entered: 03/26/2009)
03/26/2009 46 NOTICE of Denials of Commercial Due Process by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown. (dae) (Entered: 03/26/2009)
03/27/2009 47 NOTICE of Acceptance for Value, etc. by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown as to Notice of Electronic Filings of Transcripts #41 and #42. (dae) (Entered: 03/27/2009)
03/27/2009 48 NOTICE of Non-consent: Defendants do not consent to these proceedings and will not participate in any current or future proceedings... by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown. (dae) (Entered: 03/27/2009)
03/27/2009 49 RESPONSE by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown to US Attorney's Statements of Benefits to Defendants re 40 Response to Motion to Continue Trial/Prepare and Defend 26 . (dae) (Entered: 03/27/2009)

E+E aren't going to participate in their trial any longer (see below), so their need to consult with one another is no longer necessary, right?

Under the Title 4, 1 &2 Flag

2009AD, March 26

For: James Starr, d/b/a Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUI~T
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
55 Pleasant St.
Concord, N .H. [03301 ]


From: Edward-Lewis:Brown Creditor
Elaine-Alice:Brown Creditor
c/o 266 County Farm Rd.
Dover, N.H. [03820]

Re : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v . EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE BROWN
Case #09-CR-00030-01/02-CZS, 06-CR-00071-01/02-S M

Notice of Non-consent

The Edward-Lewis :Brown and the Elaine-A1ice :Brown do not consent to these
proceedings, and will not participate in any current or future proceedings for the
following reasons:

1 . As stated in court of March 11, 2009 the following statement made at that time in
open court:
We cannot consent to any proceedings in this matter, as to do so would require us to
present ourselves as legal fictions, created by the state, and not the flesh-and-blood
man and woman created by God. This would be a dishonor to God, which we cannot do .

2 . Having discovered that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA as listed on the court
documents is a known corporation under PAINE WEBBER GROUP of international
businessmen, and not the United States of America, the land, the country, we are not
able to participate in this extreme fraud;

3 . The corporation cannot interact with the private, thus the court has no jurisdiction
over the Creditors ;

4. We also are aware that court is disallowing all of our lawful process from November
18, 2004 to date, in collusion with the U.S. Attorney's office, conducting malicious
prosecution, barratry, and attempted murder to destroy Creditors ;

5 . The torture, isolation, and cruel and unusual treatment of Creditors is clear and
positive indication that the court, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Marshals and others are in
collusion to destroy Creditors by any and all means necessary, in strict violation of
all constitutional, international, and humane law.

6. Creditors are not the entities so stated on the indictment and other court documents,
as Creditors have notified the court, the U.S. Attorney's office, and every other
government agency which pertains to this matter;

7. CREDITORS' SILENCE IN THISE PROCEEDINGS DOES NOT INDICATE
ACQUIESENCE OR ACCEPTANCE ;

8 . Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera . . . . .

Edward-Lewis :Brow ; Creditor Elaine-Alice :Brown, Creditor
Holder-in-due-Course, with Holder-in-due-Course, with
unlimited commercial liability

And I made no edit to #8, that's exactly how it reads.

[Dezcad]

And #49-

RESPONSE by Edward Brown, Elaine Brown to US Attorney's Statements of Benefits to Defendants re 40 Response to Motion to Continue Trial/Prepare and Defend 26 . (dae) (Entered: 03/27/2009),

which is a a complete E+E rant, including Ed's allegations of "gassing" while in custody, can be found here:

http://www.box.net/shared/9tmczl7avg

[jkeeb]

2 . Having discovered that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA as listed on the court
documents is a known corporation under PAINE WEBBER GROUP of international
businessmen, and not the United States of America, the land, the country, we are not
able to participate in this extreme fraud;

All right, who told them? That was supposed to be kept secret.

[cynicalflyer]

From the E+E rant

"He states his information almost correctly, except that ...
4. refusal of Creditors' preferred council and counsel"

Creditors now demand of U.S. Attorney the following information as it applies to the
U.S. Attorney's case preparation :
3 . How many counselors/councils assisted
4 . List names of counsels you were disallowed

This random gibberish bought to you by Joe Haas, who has been trying to claim the Sixth Amendment's "Assistance of Counsel for his defense" really means "Assistance of CounCIL for his defense", meaning anyone E+E wants to name to their "council of advisers" or some such.

http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.ph ... #msg287561

Ed's in Max and can't have visitors, so said the officer when I called there this morning.

So Keith, did _________ (name withheld) who you called me about the other day, get to be on Ed's list of counselors in his Council? Like one of King Arthur's Knights of the Round Table. This is his right as guaranteed by both the 6th + 9th Amendments to the United States Const., re: the right in the former "to have the Assistance of counsel"ors for his defense, in the plural, since by the latter because "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." *
...

P.S. * For the words: defense counsel sixth amenedment history over at the http://www.google.com/ search engine I did find at the top of page #1 there the "History of Right to Counsel" from the NLADA at http://www.nlada.org/About/About_HistoryDefender and with some good information, at paragraph #1 in that this right is "grounded in 'the principles of a civilized society', not in const. or statutory law."

Thus from the word civilized we get the word "refined" meaning: "Free of impurities" and "Precise to a fine degree; subtle; exact". So when Ed wants and claims a council of counselors he's looking to find in numbers of non- Bar Association members or those associated WITH the court members the offset to the supposed quality of that one Bar member picked from a pool of them but doing business both unlawfully and illegally withIN the system or belly of the beast!

As you can imagine, Joe's claim to be E+E "council" was rejected by the Warden/Superintendent, thus E+ E's efforts to get the US Attorney to name "List names of counsels you were disallowed" because poor E+E were denied Joe.

How sad.