
Also, the Vinny Eastwood interview is now available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--MqtMNe-us
Moderator: Burnaby49
All of this is completely irrelevant, as the standard YouTube licence (detailed in the Terms of Service) basically states that YouTube grants you the right to broadcast your video on YouTube. Apart from that, you retain all copyright.© Dean Clifford - Content on here is Strictly not for mirroring or publishing or resale or redistribution or editing or use in other productions that are not approved by me. Please only link to the original source on this channel and refer to this playlist or video hosted on this channel.
Violations of my copyright will result in a valid claim being made against you which may result in your YouTube channel being terminated or website being removed from search listings. Any profiteering using my copyrighted content will result in punitive damages.
Those who have previously supported and promoted my seminars, presentations and/or discussions in the past by re-uploading elsewhere, please update your channels and playlists to only add or link to the content hosted on my channel from now on. any enquirers, please content me by sending a message via this 'Send Message' button on the about page. Please feel free to write up a Synopsis about this presentation and send it through.
Wake Up! Productions wrote:. . .the Vinny Eastwood interview is now available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--MqtMNe-us
Oh come on, that's too easy.Any profiteering using my copyrighted content will result in punitive damages.
Response to Dean Clifford and his LIES !!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN3rRG-ltMAJeffrey wrote:Oh come on, that's too easy.Any profiteering using my copyrighted content will result in punitive damages.
It's always been Dean's MO to go on freeman web radio shows and tell everybody what stud he is. But, I'm beginning to think he's trying to convince himself as well as the faithful he's got the courts beat and the evil debunkers are trying to shut down his new "community".Llwellyn wrote:Love the video, always amusing, to listen to Dean ranting this way and that.. First off, it' a CONSPIRACY to take down the FREE sites.. then it' a Revenge attack with tens or hundreds of fake accounts.. .. <sigh> .. guy can't even keep the story line straight for 10 min.
I am still wagering that he will do something or have some silly filing in court, that will again delay his incarceration (I know a guy, with a good lawyer, spent almost 7 years fighting a charge, the whole time, remaining out of jail.. they did finally incarcerate them, however it was argued to a mitigated sentence and such.. my friend should be out in 3 years now)
Llwellyn
Guardian and Keeper of the Tor
Ah but Dean was born in 1975, so maybe he's not a citizen!Persons who are citizens
3. (1) Subject to this Act, a person is a citizen if
(a) the person was born in Canada after February 14, 1977;
The previous legislation was the 1947 act which says:(j) under prior legislation, the person had been a citizen
Holy smokes, Dean was a Canadian citizen this whole time!"A person born after the commencement of this act is a natural-born Canadian citizen if he is born in Canada."
Yes, the purpose of the 1977 date directly impacted my girlfriend. Her and her parents came to Canada from Northern Ireland in 1970. At that time anyone from the U.K. and Northern Ireland residing in Canada were automatically considered to have dual citizenship. In 1977 Canadian citizenship was stripped from my GF (and over 100,000 others). To this day, my GF remains a "Permanent Resident" of Canada.Jeffrey wrote:Let's see what this citizenship act is all about:
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts ... lText.html
Yeah, nothing about forfeiting property to her majesty.
Ah but Dean was born in 1975, so maybe he's not a citizen!Persons who are citizens
3. (1) Subject to this Act, a person is a citizen if
(a) the person was born in Canada after February 14, 1977;
The previous legislation was the 1947 act which says:(j) under prior legislation, the person had been a citizen
http://www.pier21.ca/research/immigrati ... p-act-1947
Holy smokes, Dean was a Canadian citizen this whole time!"A person born after the commencement of this act is a natural-born Canadian citizen if he is born in Canada."
Strangely enough prior to the 1947 act there were no Canadian citizens. My father was born in Saskatchewan in 1920 and fought in WWII with the Canadian Army in the Canadian Scottish regiment along with his three brothers. One died in the battle of Ortona, another severely injured when his tank blew up, another (father) laid low by disease and the fourth got through with a whole skin. None became Canadian citizens until 1947. They were just British subjects. William Lyon Mackenzie King, our prime minister at the time, got the Citizenship Act legislated and made sure that he was designated the first Canadian citizen. I believe his official citizenship number was 1.The previous legislation was the 1947 act which says:
http://www.pier21.ca/research/immigrati ... p-act-1947
Holy smokes, Dean was a Canadian citizen this whole time!"A person born after the commencement of this act is a natural-born Canadian citizen if he is born in Canada."
this is where deaner says something like he is a natural citizen and not a corporate citizen...Jeffrey wrote:Holy smokes, Dean was a Canadian citizen this whole time!"A person born after the commencement of this act is a natural-born Canadian citizen if he is born in Canada."
The point that seems to be missing in action here is that Dean seems to think that the Criminal Code ONLY applies to Canadian citizens. If this were the case, then Americans could come here, commit all kinds of criminal mayhem and get away scot free !!!bmxninja357 wrote:this is where deaner says something like he is a natural citizen and not a corporate citizen...Jeffrey wrote:Holy smokes, Dean was a Canadian citizen this whole time!"A person born after the commencement of this act is a natural-born Canadian citizen if he is born in Canada."
peace,
ninj
But he also knows that if he gets a strike then Youtube takes away his ability to monetize his videos for 6 months. Meaning no $$ for Vinny. Money will win out in this situation.Jeffrey wrote:Shouldn't be threatening him with takedown notices when he's already pissed about Santilli taking his channel down.
Anyone care to translate?REQUISITION OET TO 27JAN2016 AT 1:30PM, SUB/SER ORDER APPROVED IN CRT PER B.C., ADD IN SAT EDITION OF WFP LEGAL NOTICES, (EFF 5 DAYS)