Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean
Pursuant to the jury verdict returned Friday, November 20, 2009, which acquitted the Defendants identified herein of all charges, the offenses alleged within the Bill of Indictment with reference to Defendants KATHY RAY WAHLER, EDWARD WILLIAM WAHLER, and LEWIS VINCENT HUGHES, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
NOTICE RE: REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have 5 business days to file a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction and 21 calendar days to file a Redaction Request. If no notice is filed, this transcript will be made electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter before the 90 day deadline. After that date it may be
obtained through PACER. Policy at http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov
No, I caught it all right. I just was laughing at the idiocy of people who twist themselves into pretzels trying to "prove" that they are John Jacob Jingleheimer, of the family Schmidt, instead of John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt.David Merrill wrote:You are welcome! Maybe you didn't catch the P.S.
Pursuant to the jury verdict returned Friday, November 20, 2009, which acquitted the Defendants identified herein of all charges, the offenses alleged within the Bill of Indictment with reference to Defendants KATHY RAY WAHLER, EDWARD WILLIAM WAHLER, and LEWIS VINCENT HUGHES, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
Pottapaug1938 wrote:No, I caught it all right. I just was laughing at the idiocy of people who twist themselves into pretzels trying to "prove" that they are John Jacob Jingleheimer, of the family Schmidt, instead of John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt.David Merrill wrote:You are welcome! Maybe you didn't catch the P.S.
Pursuant to the jury verdict returned Friday, November 20, 2009, which acquitted the Defendants identified herein of all charges, the offenses alleged within the Bill of Indictment with reference to Defendants KATHY RAY WAHLER, EDWARD WILLIAM WAHLER, and LEWIS VINCENT HUGHES, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
Why should he? It's your claim that your random words actually works, prove it yourself.David Merrill wrote: The result was acquittal. Let Wesley dig up that transcript for us? It shows what I mean.
Thule wrote:Why should he? It's your claim that your random words actually works, prove it yourself.David Merrill wrote: The result was acquittal. Let Wesley dig up that transcript for us? It shows what I mean.
Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....
There is no appeal on an acquittal; the jury found the Wahlers not guilty and from what we gather here, the prosecution apparently failed to convince them. But the Wahlers will probably not change their ways and will wind up with another indictment for other acts.Pottapaug1938 wrote:Looking at the top, it looks as if this is a case of jury nullification, rather than of the wahlers' claims withstanding legal challenges.
I will respect the principles claimed by the Wahlers once they have withstood appellate review.
Judge Roy Bean wrote:There is no appeal on an acquittal; the jury found the Wahlers not guilty and from what we gather here, the prosecution apparently failed to convince them. But the Wahlers will probably not change their ways and will wind up with another indictment for other acts.Pottapaug1938 wrote:Looking at the top, it looks as if this is a case of jury nullification, rather than of the wahlers' claims withstanding legal challenges.
I will respect the principles claimed by the Wahlers once they have withstood appellate review.
But we see again the twisted mental logic Van Pelt uses to equate his gibberish with a simple event. There is no relationship between the two, but Van Pelt gets all excited about his hit counters and is compelled to re-re-re-re-re-re-regurgitate.
Minute Entry: JURY TRIAL as to Kathy Ray Wahler, Edward William Wahler, Lewis Vincent Hughes held before District Judge Richard Voorhees. Jury deliberation continues. Jury returns verdict. Government attorney: Jill Rose &Mark Odulio. Standby Counsel: Angela Parrott, Fredilyn Sison, William Terpening &David Burgess. Defendants are Pro Se. Court Reporter Cheryl Nuccio. (cbb) (Entered: 11/23/2009)
I know that; I was thinking more of similar cases which say the same things that the Wahlers foisted upon the rubes on the jury in their case.Judge Roy Bean wrote:There is no appeal on an acquittal.....Pottapaug1938 wrote:Looking at the top, it looks as if this is a case of jury nullification, rather than of the wahlers' claims withstanding legal challenges.
I will respect the principles claimed by the Wahlers once they have withstood appellate review.
Hey, if the jury is willing to go off the rails, it doesn't matter how sound a case you present in court.David Merrill wrote:You really gotta get a kick outa this Quatloser slur:
Minute Entry: JURY TRIAL as to Kathy Ray Wahler, Edward William Wahler, Lewis Vincent Hughes held before District Judge Richard Voorhees. Jury deliberation continues. Jury returns verdict. Government attorney: Jill Rose &Mark Odulio. Standby Counsel: Angela Parrott, Fredilyn Sison, William Terpening &David Burgess. Defendants are Pro Se. Court Reporter Cheryl Nuccio. (cbb) (Entered: 11/23/2009)
Count them! Six government attorners!
