Is a Person a Man, That Is in, but Not On?

[Chicknuggets]

Yes yes, it is I, even I, Yours truly, your daddy at law (hereafter "D"), back from the (legally) dead, more poignant than ever, unravelling the hidden treasure troves of law, to be adjudicated or decided according to: the court of public opinion, guided by the stern hand of logic as it pertains to the interpretation of language; the Common Law (whatever the meaning); and the US courts and its body of law.

So so, dispensing with the self-panegyrics, getting right down to business: notwithstanding any special status conferred on D. by the jurisdiction, why is it totally possible for D. to be on the US, yet never be in it, and vice versa, be in, but not on; and, seemingly related, does article 6 of the "UHDR" really say that "Everyone [human] has the right to recognition everywhere as a human [not an elephant⸮] before the law.", and what does it mean?

Now now, run along, and excogitate on D's deep mysteries as here presented!

/ D.

[Burnaby49]

Is this our troll Rad back yet again under another persona?

[NYGman]

Sorry, I do not understand your word salad. Semantics aside, Empirical Evidence would lead anyone to conclude that a natural person within the boarders of the United States, and its territories, is within the United States, and may also be standing, sitting, laying, traversing on land within the United States. Therefore whether you are in or on, hovering above above, floating besides, tunneling below, you are within the US Jurisdiction.

Not only that, you do not even have to be a US Citizen, or even lawfully in this country for the laws to apply. If you were flying from Mexico to Canada, and gave birth while flying over America, Guess what, your child is American, even if they ave never touched the ground.

So regardless of what you think or believe, it is irrelevant how you view your status in this country, it is how this country view those present in its domain. You mere presence here is enough for you to be subject to the laws of this country, regardless of your beliefs. And even if you believe that your consciousness is separate from your physical body, it will still be your physical body going to jail for whatever your consciousness did. Good luck with that Little d.

[bmxninja357]

whomever wrote that first post drivel needs an enema. im assuming thats the logical version of them having a lobotomy given the placement of their cranium.

ninj

[The Observer]

Semantics aside,..

I wouldn't even give him the benefit of the doubt on that one. Semantics implies at least some sense of intellectual honesty behind its usage. This is just sophistry - and poor sophistry at that.

[AndyK]

79.138.132.100 resolves to somewhere in Sweden.

We appear to have an authentic Scandinavian troll.

[bmxninja357]

thats odd; i usually like Swedish meatballs.

ninj

[notorial dissent]

whomever wrote that first post drivel needs an enema. im assuming thats the logical version of them having a lobotomy given the placement of their cranium.

ninj

You're assuming he hasn't already had one??? Although there probably wasn't much there to remove to begin with.

[Gregg]

no no no nope no no HELL NO....you wanna jerk off go find some porn, I won't allow you to just ...well, jerk off. GLP or Sui should feel more like home to you, if not a room with padding on the walls, but not here.

locked