How do Detax/Freemen/Sovereigns make out at the Supreme Court of Canada?
Now we know - and the answer is not very well.
Here's a link and summary to the new article published in the Alberta Law Review by Canadian expert Donald Netolitzky and Richard Warman (one of the first to deal with detax anti-Jewish haters in the legal forum of a human rights tribunal):
https://www.albertalawreview.com/index. ... /2593/2553
ENJOY THE SILENCE: PSEUDOLAW AT THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
DONALD J.NETOLITZKY AND RICHARD WARMAN
Pseudolaw is a collection of legal-sounding but false rules that purport to be law, employed by groups including the Detaxer and Freemen-on-the-Land movements. While pseudolaw is universally rejected by Canadian courts, no Supreme Court of Canada decision addresses these concepts.
This study reviews 51 unsuccessful Supreme Court leave applications that potentially involve pseudolaw to determine what pseudolaw issues were raised, whether those issues were comprehensible, and therefore if by its silence the Supreme Court has implicitly rejected these concepts.Some pseudolaw-related leave applications were not comprehensible to a legally trained reader; however, the remainder clearly imply that the Supreme Court of Canada has been exposed to the cornerstone concepts of modern pseudolaw, including “Strawman” Theory, and has rejected these ideas as not having national significance.
Here's the soundtrack:
How do Detax/Freemen/Sovereigns make out at the Supreme Court?
Moderator: Burnaby49
-
- Swabby
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:23 pm
-
- Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
- Posts: 4287
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am
Re: How do Detax/Freemen/Sovereigns make out at the Supreme Court?
Vows are spoken to be broken, words are meaningless, and forgettable.
Donald Netolitzky did a lot of research here on Quatloos.
Donald Netolitzky did a lot of research here on Quatloos.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
-
- Chief Landscaper of the Quatloosian Meads
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:39 am
Re: How do Detax/Freemen/Sovereigns make out at the Supreme Court?
What can I say? I go where the data is.
And in this business, if one of your first stops isn't Quatloos, then you're probably missing out on much that is highly relevant.
(In other words, thanks again guys for doing what you do.)
Donald Netolitzky
And in this business, if one of your first stops isn't Quatloos, then you're probably missing out on much that is highly relevant.
(In other words, thanks again guys for doing what you do.)
Donald Netolitzky
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7683
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: How do Detax/Freemen/Sovereigns make out at the Supreme Court?
You've been a big part of it, Donald.DNetolitzky wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:35 pm(In other words, thanks again guys for doing what you do.)
In any event, the exorcism of frickentards is its own reward.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
-
- Further Moderator
- Posts: 7613
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
- Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith
Re: How do Detax/Freemen/Sovereigns make out at the Supreme Court?
Now, if we could only get them to stop passing their genes down.wserra wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:42 amYou've been a big part of it, Donald.DNetolitzky wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:35 pm(In other words, thanks again guys for doing what you do.)
In any event, the exorcism of frickentards is its own reward.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff