Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by Gregg »

Not to put too fine a point to it, but in fact all the 16th Amendment did was clarify the argument about what today would be certain kinds of capital gains. What now "wages, tips and other compensation" was never at issue in the case that led to the adoption of the 16th Amendment. The fighting at the time was over I believe rents collected,the issue was if taxing such rents was in fact a direct tax on the property that was for hire.

Taxing your pay from the day job was never seriously challenged until much later in history, I think the first time it was raised in a court of law may have been after WWII.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by Gregg »

Is it just me or is the board a little wonky lately. When I went to edit my grammar (oops) in the last post, it doesn't show the prior post in the dialogue box, which I've also noticed when I try to use the quote button for the last week or so.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by LPC »

truth wrote:could all who are stating that wages are taxable income to the regular worker , look up in black laws dictionary 6th edition the definition of "labor".
Sorry, but the Constitution of the United States, and the Supreme Court decisions applying the Constitution, are the Supreme Law of the Land, and not Black's Law Dictionary.
truth wrote:I will not entertain any more blog pertaining to this issue,
That's okay. All your blog are belong to us now.
truth wrote: but i will look forward for the explaination of the black laws definition of "labor."
Don't know what that definition is. I've been practicing law for more than 34 years and I've never owned a copy and, as far as I can remember, have never looked at it.

Here's the definition from the on-line version of Black's:
1. Work; toil; service. Continued exertion, of the more onerous and inferior kind, usually and chiefly consisting in the protracted expenditure of muscular force, adapted to the accomplishment of specific useful ends. It is used in this sense in several legal phrases, such as “a count for work and labor,” “wages of labor,” etc. “Labor.” “business,” and “work” are not synonyms. Labor may be business, but it is not necessarily so; and business is not always labor. Labor implies toil; exertion producing weariness; manual exertion of a toilsome nature. Making an agreement for the sale of a chattel is not within a prohibition of common labor upon Sunday, though it is (if by a merchant in his calling) within a prohibition upon business. Bloom v. Richards. 2 Ohio St. 387.
Okay, so what. What is it in the above definition that you think supports the idea that Congress can't tax payments for labor?
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by LPC »

Gregg wrote:Another hint, 1 thought,1 sentence, with a period and a space after it.
Carriage returns, with blank spaces between paragraphs, are also appreciated.

Easier to read.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Dr. Caligari
J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by Dr. Caligari »

truth wrote:to answer a question i have taken this action to court
Truth, you are Adam Zuckman?
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7624
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by wserra »

For those interested, here is Zuckman's complaint. Judge Garaufis quickly dismissed it, granting the defendants' 12(b) motions in short order. As you can see from the complaint, Zuckman attempted to sue his employer (the NYC Transit Authority) for honoring the IRS levy, as well as the govt for asserting it.

The judge did, however, deny the govt's motions for monetary sanctions and a declaration that Zuckman is a vexatious litigant. TWO VICTORIES!
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by Gregg »

LPC wrote:
Gregg wrote:Another hint, 1 thought,1 sentence, with a period and a space after it.
Carriage returns, with blank spaces between paragraphs, are also appreciated.

Easier to read.
It was the darned Jesuits who taught me, for the most part.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 3096
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
Location: Wherever my truck goes.

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by JamesVincent »

Gregg wrote:
LPC wrote:
Gregg wrote:Another hint, 1 thought,1 sentence, with a period and a space after it.
Carriage returns, with blank spaces between paragraphs, are also appreciated.

Easier to read.
It was the darned Jesuits who taught me, for the most part.
Sheesh, you all expect a lot out of a drive-by irrational ranter dontcha?
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire

Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by LPC »

Dr. Caligari wrote:
truth wrote:to answer a question i have taken this action to court
Truth, you are Adam Zuckman?
Good point. It would explain a lot.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7559
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by The Observer »

UGA Lawdog wrote:
Gregg wrote:It was the darned Jesuits who taught me, for the most part.
I just hope they didn't do to you what Voltaire claimed they did to him.
They forced Greg to learn Latin and Greek?
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
Dr. Caligari
J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by Dr. Caligari »

LPC wrote:
Dr. Caligari wrote:
truth wrote:to answer a question i have taken this action to court
Truth, you are Adam Zuckman?
Good point. It would explain a lot.
Read the Complaint filed in the district court. It's the same guy.
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7624
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by wserra »

Dr. Caligari wrote:Read the Complaint filed in the district court. It's the same guy.
Agreed.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by Gregg »

No greek, but enough latin for me to get into a good bar fight in 3rd century Rome.

:Axe:
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7624
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: Second Circuit Keeps It Short And Sweet

Post by wserra »

Mr. Zuckman apparently has some difficulties telling the difference between things that work and things that don't. He keeps attempting the latter.

A quick records search shows that, over the last few years, he has repeatedly filed UCC-1s on himself, calling himself both "Debtor" and "Secured Party". He has repeatedly attempted to trademark his name. He has filed for bankruptcy (05-bk-16187, NYED), and received a discharge per Chapter 7; but it appears that his tax debts were not discharged, as he continued to litigate over them (and they usually aren't discharged anyway).

Finally, a few years ago he fought over an IRS summons, although the docket (06-mc-492, NYED) isn't clear as to why DOJ voluntarily dismissed the action (they got the info from other sources and began enforcement?). Anyway, after the case was dismissed, Zuckman filed this sad little letter. It didn't work either.

Perhaps he will one day figure out that the best way to avoid this type of tsuris is to pay your taxes. If in fact he is "truth", however, perhaps not.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume