Snicker

Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Snicker

Post by Demosthenes »

NH tax evading couple files suit against town
November 5, 2010
NEWPORT, N.H. --A New Hampshire couple sentenced to prison following a nine-month standoff with authorities over their federal tax-evasion conviction have sued the town where they lived, saying it should have prevented their arrests back in 2007.
Ed and Elaine Brown's lawsuit says because they paid their Plainfield property taxes, the town should have shielded them from federal authorities. The couple, who insist the federal income tax is unconstitutional, holed up in their home after being sentenced to five years in prison for tax evasion. They're in prison on conspiracy and weapons charges.
The lawsuit was filed last month in Sullivan County Superior Court.
Demo.
bmielke

Re: Snicker

Post by bmielke »

This is the saga that never ends...
Yes it goes on and on my friend...
Some people started living it one day not know what it was...
And now it is the saga that never ends!

A la Lamb Chops
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 6120
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: Snicker

Post by Pottapaug1938 »

What's the over/under on how many days it takes the court to broom this latest piece of legal "scholarship" out the door, I wonder?
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1231
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Re: Snicker

Post by Number Six »

I will look forward to the judge's response to their suit.

This is why we need the federal government. Local officials are limited in their resources to deal with anarchists with widespread connections to other anarchist groups. Check out your state's US Attorney press releases for issues the federal law enforcement pros consider priorities. Even the paytriots would agree they prosecute worthy cases that local law enforcement is unable or unwilling to address. In the end, people like the Browns support those who act outside of the law and act as vigilantes.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
Red Cedar PM
Burnished Vanquisher of the Kooloohs
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:10 pm

Re: Snicker

Post by Red Cedar PM »

I'm sure this would be unconstitutional, but it does seem like it would be nice if someone had to pass a basic IQ test before they could file a lawsuit.

On second thought, I know a few dumb lawyers that may be out of work if that were the case. :wink:
"Pride cometh before thy fall."

--Dantonio 11:03:07
Grixit wrote:Hey Diller: forget terms like "wages", "income", "derived from", "received", etc. If you did something, and got paid for it, you owe tax.
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Re: Snicker

Post by LPC »

The lawsuit was filed last month in Sullivan County Superior Court.
No on-line docket, so no easy way to read the complaint, which could/should be a hoot.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
User avatar
webhick
Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
Posts: 3994
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am

Re: Snicker

Post by webhick »

Can't remember...was Ed & Elaine even caught up on their property taxes at the time of the standoff?
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Snicker

Post by Famspear »

webhick wrote:Can't remember...was Ed & Elaine even caught up on their property taxes at the time of the standoff?
I don't think so.
In mid-July 2007, Ed Brown also announced that he would stop paying school and town property taxes to the town of Plainfield, New Hampshire. A local newspaper quoted Brown as saying: "They don't provide me any services, I'm not going to contribute to them anymore."
----Kristen Senz, "Brown decides property taxes are not worth paying," New Hampshire Union Leader, July 14, 2007.

That news report was issued during the standoff, which ended on October 4, 2007.

EDIT: I suppose that Ed and Elaine might be saying that although they stopped paying property taxes during the standoff in 2007, they had previously paid property taxes for at least some prior years.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 4287
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am

Re: Snicker

Post by grixit »

This might be the final straw that gets them the no further filings without permission order.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
bmielke

Re: Snicker

Post by bmielke »

grixit wrote:This might be the final straw that gets them the no further filings without permission order.
Has he filed a lot of stuff in county court? Or New Hampshire State court?
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Re: Snicker

Post by Demosthenes »

Quick and dirty background.

A few years prior to the standoff, the Browns stopped paying property taxes because Ed didn't want to fund the homosexual agenda of public schools. The county threatened to take the home, and Ed threatened a violent standoff. Ed and Elaine capitulated at the last moment, and started paying property taxes again. During the later income tax standoff, they stopped paying again because Ed was angry that the Sheriff wouldn't arrest the Feds, but realistically, he was losing everything to forfeiture anyway, so why bother paying property taxes at that point?
Demo.
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Snicker

Post by Famspear »

Demosthenes wrote:.......but realistically, he was losing everything to forfeiture anyway, so why bother paying property taxes at that point?
That's what I always liked about Ed -- his firm grasp of the principles of logic.

:Axe:
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Snicker

Post by Gregg »

Isn't about time someone took Ed's Red Crayola away from him?
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Brandybuck

Re: Snicker

Post by Brandybuck »

I object to the comparison of anarchists to the Browns. An anarchist will simply not pay his taxes and not make up an excuse about it.
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1231
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Re: Snicker

Post by Number Six »

Quick definition on anarchism:

1: a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power
2: a person who believes in, advocates, or promotes anarchism or anarchy; especially : one who uses violent means to overthrow the established order

Seems applicable to the Browns to me. And although there are level-headed anarcho-capitalists who are more fun to be around, like the "Bureau-crash" couple that I met, the Browns probably deserve the anarchist title based on their actions.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
Lambkin
Warder of the Quatloosian Gibbet
Posts: 1206
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:43 pm

Re: Snicker

Post by Lambkin »

Number Six wrote:1: a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power
The Browns are not anti-authoritarians. I think this definition should say "all" not "any" and for that reason the Browns don't meet it. I think Ed Brown is very much into his own authority over others, which is not anarchism.
2: a person who believes in, advocates, or promotes anarchism or anarchy; especially : one who uses violent means to overthrow the established order
I don't know where you got this and can only assume you have not met many anarchists, most of whom are into things like dumpster-diving and vegan coop cooking.
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1231
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Re: Snicker

Post by Number Six »

It was the Merriam-Webster definition. Yes, I have met some of the "anarchists" that you describe, the peaceful ones. There are the violent ones too. I spoke with a formerly licensed psychologist at a war tax resister meeting last fall who had gone up to pay a visit to Ed Brown to see what kind of man he was. Ed was unbelievably haughty with this man, who was made to feel that he should be immensely grateful for the privalege to be granted a meeting with him. The NPD criteria fit him to a tee.

We could have a discussion on modern political movements and definitions which have become increasingly difficult to apply precisely. Actions speak louder than words. When someone will not recognize any real authority, and booby traps his property in a way to maim authorities who would come on his land, I would think that there would be a politically precise term for this. When the anarchists disown violent extremists, this tells you something.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
Dezcad
Khedive Ismail Quatoosia
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:19 pm

Re: Snicker

Post by Dezcad »

NEWS: Judge Denies Browns' Suit Against Plainfield
Newport -- A New Hampshire Superior Court judge has dismissed a lawsuit by imprisoned tax protesters Ed and Elaine Brown, who sued the town of Plainfield for failing to try to stop their arrest by federal agents in 2007.
http://www.vnews.com/12302010/12302010.htm
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Snicker

Post by Famspear »

NEWS: Judge Denies Browns' Suit Against Plainfield
Newport -- A New Hampshire Superior Court judge has dismissed a lawsuit by imprisoned tax protesters Ed and Elaine Brown, who sued the town of Plainfield for failing to try to stop their arrest by federal agents in 2007.
Ed's probable response: "*$#&^%@!!!?!!! Those Jewish Freemason Zionist Illuminati Lawyers did it to me again!!!"

:brickwall:

EDIT: Or, as Ed himself actually put it, long long ago, in a place far, far away:
This is the beginning of one very huge movement. I'm not quite sure you understand the ramifications of what's going on right now. This is massive. This is international. We are fed up with the Zionist Illuminati. That's what this is all about. Loud and clear. Zionist Illuminati. Lawyers, whatever they are, okay, it's going to stop. And if the judge is a member of that, I know that McAuliffe [the Federal judge in Brown's tax case] is, I know that U.S. Attorney Colantuono is, they'd better stop. This is a warning. You can do whatever you want to me. My job is to get the message out, and I'm getting the message out, and I'm warning you guys - not you guys [referring to the radio show hosts], them - to cease and desist their unlawful activity in this country and every other country because once this thing starts, we're going to seek them out and hunt them down. And we're going to bring them to justice. So anybody wishes to join them, you go right ahead and join them. But I promise you, long after I'm gone, they're going to seek out every one of you and your bloodline.
----Margot Sanger-Katz, "Browns on the record," Concord Monitor, April 27, 2007.

And, of course this gem:
"We're not conspiracy theorists," Brown said, settling into a chair on his unfinished concrete porch. "We deal with conspiracy facts. Freemasonry and Judaism—that is the truth. That is the fact. That is where all the world's problems come from… I know for a fact that they're working together."
--Jan. 18, 2007, "Man Holed Up in Home After Tax Verdict", Associated Press.

What a guy....
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
Quixote
Quatloosian Master of Deception
Posts: 1542
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Sanhoudalistan

Re: Snicker

Post by Quixote »

Dezcad wrote:
NEWS: Judge Denies Browns' Suit Against Plainfield
Newport -- A New Hampshire Superior Court judge has dismissed a lawsuit by imprisoned tax protesters Ed and Elaine Brown, who sued the town of Plainfield for failing to try to stop their arrest by federal agents in 2007.
http://www.vnews.com/12302010/12302010.htm
The lead story on that page was about a ski resort having to close its lifts due to high winds. Even an apparent rehash of a power outage 11 months ago beat out the Browns for space.
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat