Million dollar whistleblower award

ashlynne39
Illuminated Legate of Illustrious Legs
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 5:27 am

Million dollar whistleblower award

Post by ashlynne39 »

Has anyone here made a whistleblower report to the IRS? I don't care about a reward, but this article says the program is only for returns of more than $2 million. I thought there was another program for less than $2 million.

Politics
IRS Awards $4.5M to Whistleblower

Published April 08, 2011
| Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA -- An in-house accountant who raised a red flag about a tax lapse that his employer then ignored, leading him to tip off the IRS, has received $4.5 million in the first IRS whistleblower award.

The accountant's tip netted the IRS $20 million in taxes and interest from the errant financial-services firm.

The award represents a 22 percent cut of the taxes recovered. The program, designed to encourage tips in large-scale cases, mandates awards of 15 to 30 percent of the amount recouped.

"It ought to encourage a lot of other people to squeal," Sen. Charles Grassley told The Associated Press. The Iowa Republican helped get the IRS Whistleblower Office authorized in 2006.

The IRS mailed the accountant's lawyer a $3.24 million check that arrived in suburban Philadelphia by first-class mail Thursday. The sum represents the award minus a 28 percent tax hit.

The lawyer, Eric L. Young of Blue Bell, won't release the name of his client or the firm because his client remains a small-town accountant, and hopes to continue to work in his field.

"It's a win-win for both the government and taxpayers. These are dollars that are being returned to the Treasury that otherwise wouldn't be," Young said.

"It's very difficult to be a whistleblower," said Young, who has represented more than a dozen such tipsters, including one in a $2 billion Pfizer case involving off-label drug marketing.

"Most people would be inclined to turn a blind eye to it. The process can be time-consuming, arduous and stressful, from both a personal and professional standpoint," he said.

The accountant filed a complaint with the IRS in 2007, just as the IRS Whistleblower Office opened, but heard nothing for two years. Frustrated, he hired Young to help push the issue.

"We were able to help him get it back on track," Young said.

In the accountant's case, the IRS did not deem the issues he raised complex. But the agency said the information he shared pointed out new questions for a routine IRS audit that was already under way.

The Whistleblower Office received nearly 1,000 tips involving more than 3,000 taxpayers in fiscal years 2008 and 2009, according to its annual reports to Congress. Hundreds of them alleged tax underpayments of more than $10 million, and dozens more underpayments of $100 million or more.

The accountant's case is the first in the program to reach fruition.

"Quite frankly, I'm shocked that they finally got around to using it," said Grassley. He has been discouraged by the program's slow start, which some blame on ambivalence about whether tipsters should receive potentially huge windfalls. The IRS may also fear embarrassment, the senator said.

"When you got a whistleblower that's saying somebody didn't pay $20 million in taxes, that that's an embarrassment to the full-time employees of the IRS," he said.

Neither Stephen Whitlock, director of the Whistleblower Office, nor the agency's public affairs office returned messages about the program late Thursday.

However, the annual reports note a new policy of waiting to pay awards until the two-year window for taxpayers to appeal their payments has expired. Young's case might therefore be the first in a series of awards that are ripe for payment.

The office has about 17 employees, who refer complaints to IRS agents and investigators around the country to pursue. Before 2006, the IRS could choose to reward tipsters, but were under no obligation to pay them a share of the taxes recovered. Many of the tips involved mom-and-pop operations or ex-spouses.

The whistleblower program only promises awards for returns of $2 million or more.

"This law is not designed to snag the guppies, but to harpoon the whales," said Patrick Burns, president of Taxpayers Against Fraud, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit whose members include many lawyers for whistleblowers.

"Whistleblower programs have been incredibly successful in the arena of health care and defense spending, and now they are being tried as a weapon against tax cheats and Wall Street scoundrels," Burns said.
Cathulhu
Order of the Quatloos, Brevet First Class
Posts: 1258
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:51 pm

Re: Million dollar whistleblower award

Post by Cathulhu »

Criminal Investigation at IRS will always take your info, whether award involved or not. But the special agents are expensive, and they investigate bigger cases. Lesser ones deemed still worth a look are referred to Examination for an audit. There's an internal form, 3949-A, used for such referrals to CI for evaluation. If you call the toll free hotline and tell them to do a referral, that's what they'll do. But you're better off to call and ask for the local CI phone number and talk to them directly.

I'm NOT an attorney, but I've testified as expert witness in a federal trial. You learn the oddest things hanging out with special agents.
Goodness is about what you do. Not what you pray to. T. Pratchett
Always be a moving target. L.M. Bujold
Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Posts: 3704
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 6:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos

Re: Million dollar whistleblower award

Post by Judge Roy Bean »

Not to be more cynical than usual, but don't count on criminal enforcement against the protected financial class unless there is something more egregious than $2M tax evasion involved. With proper influence and representation there is little risk of losing major portions of net worth.

Having said that, if you know some ordinary Joe who is cheating on their taxes, there is another avenue: I have no statistics at hand to validate this theory, but it would seem to me that persons engaged in tax evasion are, in some part, doing so to conceal other illegal or unethical acts which may fall under other state and/or federal criminal statutes.
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three
Nikki

Re: Million dollar whistleblower award

Post by Nikki »

Agreed -- how many times have we seen in the news "Company XYZ agreeed to pay a fine of umpteen millions without admitting any wrongdoing, but promising to stop doing it" ?
melanie14

Re: Million dollar whistleblower award

Post by melanie14 »

I initially think this is a good idea except 4.5 mil is way to much. 10% of the recovered money should be good. The thing that really bothers me is that little Timmy Giethner and Charley Rangle and of course GE, Wachovia, JP Morgan and our favorite Goldman Sachs get SMALL fines or none at ALL not paying their taxes.
Last edited by wserra on Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Remove commercial links. No commercials, please.
silversopp

Re: Million dollar whistleblower award

Post by silversopp »

There's no whistle to blow in terms of GE. The company took a large loss in the previous year, which by law can be applied to the future years earnings. There is something similiar in the code for individuals, where if your net gain on stock trades is negative for one year, you can offset future profits with those losses.

With a tax department of about 1000 employees, if GE was doing anything illegal, there's a whole lot of potential whistleblowers out there. I feel more comfortable that GE is not breaking law because of the size of that department. A small company with one guy doing taxes has a lot more opportunity to break the law.
Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Posts: 3704
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 6:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos

Re: Million dollar whistleblower award

Post by Judge Roy Bean »

silversopp wrote:... A small company with one guy doing taxes has a lot more opportunity to break the law.
I hate to say it but that is sheer nonsense in today's environment.

The protected class has little or nothing to worry about. If you want to see just how bad it is, consider this NYT article:

In Financial Crisis, No Prosecutions of Top Figures

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/busin ... ecute.html

The issue really isn't whether or not crimes were committed; it's who committed them.

What's that old saying - "membership has its privileges?"
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three