getoutofdebtfools wrote:A warrant usually lasts for 12 months so given that was issued in 2012 I'm guessing that particular one expired but was then extended due to the failure to execute it. Presented with the evidence every Judge in the land would have no problem reissuing/extending the warrant to allow last year's eviction.
This is where things get a little confusing, as Letisser has said an application was made in May 2015 to issue a new warrant.
However, upon closer examination, there was no need to issue a new warrant as the one posted above was actually issued in 2014 and as confirmed by the signatures was the one used to evict Tommy Crawfraud. So whilst a later application was made, it would not appear to have resulted in a new warrant as this was was still effective and was ultimately used.
Application was made to this court for this warrant at xx minutes past the hour of 10:00 o'clock on 11 December 2014
Possession obtained and given to the claimant on 2 July 2015
signed by the Baliff
I acknowledge having received possession of the land described in this warrant on the
This was the actual warrant that was issued and was used to evict Tommy Crawfraud - All signed, dated and stamped
correctly.
Both Colon and Jay made a lot of noise about the date of the warrant. However, this was when the only copy in circulation was blurry and you could not read the actual date. Now we can read it - it proves that they are both liars (shock horror surprise). Further more it proves all the claims made by all the Crawfrauds about the warrant/unicorn are just more lies.
One of the rooftop six has confirmed that this warrant was part of the legal bundle that they were given as part of their case so every claim made since then by the other rooftop six + 1 have been lies lies and more lies.
But hey given that it is the Crawfrauds, Colon and Jay - what else would we expect