Jon Witterick stepping down from GOODF

[daveBeeston]

Come on guys and gals lets not let this thread descend into another Quatloos members vs Tuco argument.

Lets keep the thread on topic and not derail it for petty arguments and personal grievances with each other.

[Tuco]

Have a read of this before you start preaching to me about obligations. I'd get in fast though-Admin usually delete links to scams carried out by Government agencies:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ayers.html

"Don't believe me? Read The Daily Mail!!"

Actually Lightening, it isn't a Daily Mail report. It is a review of a very well constructed documentary carried out by Channel 4's "Dispatches". Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a recording of the actual show.

But hey-Why should you break the habit of a lifetime and get something right eh? Let's brush it under the carpet and pretend it didn't happen, like with the selling of agreements.

[Henti]

I don't think it is Tuco, so much as what he represents.

It's not just members on here either.

Now he seems to be arguing that one supposedly uncontionable action , excuses another.

[longdog]

Actually Lightening, it isn't a Daily Mail report. It is a review of a very well constructed documentary carried out by Channel 4's "Dispatches". Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a recording of the actual show.

But hey-Why should you break the habit of a lifetime and get something right eh? Let's brush it under the carpet and pretend it didn't happen, like with the selling of agreements.

Ah right... Because it's a review of a TV programme it's immune to the Daily Mail's usual right-wing agenda... OK.

Who are you going to cite next? Rense? Whale.to?

[rumpelstilzchen]

As for your question, no I would not like anyone to provide accommodation foc to a scumbag who was trying it on. I have told you before, my stance is to help the little person. I have no sympathy if the occasional Tom Crawford comes along and shafts the big boys. Unlike the little person, the big boys can afford it

Double standards.

[ArthurWankspittle]

Right knock it off, this is going way off topic.

[Bones]

I have been giving this some thought.

I wonder if John sold GOODF to someone and the crowdfunding was a cash grab by the new owner. Afterall it was not John or any other known name that set up the crowd funding page.

[Bungle]

Come on guys and gals lets not let this thread descend into another Quatloos members vs Tuco argument.

Lets keep the thread on topic and not derail it for petty arguments and personal grievances with each other.

And the way to make sure that Tuco does not derail yet another thread is to IGNORE HIM.

He was a prolific poster on Getoutofdebtfree for a long time with the username of Butterfingers. This thread from just two years back demonstrates that he has a nasty attitude and a desire to start arguments. He hasn't changed (see pages 2 and 3).

http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... GjtwLGcaCQ

PS: Like most posts associated with Butterfingers, this one was not stored on anyone's computer. It was found easily by way of a simple google search using these words: Getoutofdebtfree...Butterfingers...Lord Denning....Letissier

[Bones]

And back to John.........

[Bungle]

They did it!
http://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/getoutofde ... -expansion

says the Crowdfunder site. Well not quite the £30,000 but they did get £2365 from 134 of their 65,000 members.

Good effort everyone. The Goodf website is now safe for a few months until Colon trashes it.

So Witterfuck, what is your next move? How about crawling back underneath the rock from whence you came?

After the GOODF Crowdfunder failure (an average donation of just £17 each), Witterick then went on to greater success with a new Crowdfunding appeal for his local social club. The donations were much more generous (average of £64 each).

http://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/studland-social-club

[wserra]

And the way to make sure that Tuco does not derail yet another thread is to IGNORE HIM.

Amen.

Too bad it must be enforced.