Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Captain
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 1:38 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
I call it as I see it
I speak my mind
I don't hold back
I speak my mind
I don't hold back
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Glad that he was cleared.
Ridiculous charge anyway, "behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace "would have been more appropriate and likely to stick.
I've yet to see Tom being violent in any video, despite the obvious stress he is under.
This is likely to open up claims from him against the old bill, Guy and Ebert are probably on the case right now.
And the spitter " accidentally " spat in the cops face?....good to see that excuse got kicked into touch.
Today really was a success, boom !!!!!
Ridiculous charge anyway, "behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace "would have been more appropriate and likely to stick.
I've yet to see Tom being violent in any video, despite the obvious stress he is under.
This is likely to open up claims from him against the old bill, Guy and Ebert are probably on the case right now.
And the spitter " accidentally " spat in the cops face?....good to see that excuse got kicked into touch.
Today really was a success, boom !!!!!
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:18 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
You are being modest, we know it was the sound advice you gave him last week that swung it his way.Joinder wrote:Glad that he was cleared.
Ridiculous charge anyway, "behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace "would have been more appropriate and likely to stick.
I've yet to see Tom being violent in any video, despite the obvious stress he is under.
This is likely to open up claims from him against the old bill, Guy and Ebert are probably on the case right now.
And the spitter " accidentally " spat in the cops face?....good to see that excuse got kicked into touch.
Today really was a success, boom !!!!!
If people from Poland are called Poles Why are aren't people from Holland called Holes?
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
I was hoping that I could keep my involvement out of the public eye, I thought you said you were going away.?vampireLOREN wrote:You are being modest, we know it was the sound advice you gave him last week that swung it his way.Joinder wrote:Glad that he was cleared.
Ridiculous charge anyway, "behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace "would have been more appropriate and likely to stick.
I've yet to see Tom being violent in any video, despite the obvious stress he is under.
This is likely to open up claims from him against the old bill, Guy and Ebert are probably on the case right now.
And the spitter " accidentally " spat in the cops face?....good to see that excuse got kicked into touch.
Today really was a success, boom !!!!!
Oh well, its out in the open now, unless you do the decent thing and delete it ?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Yes, got that - 'the force by the police was more than necessary' but TC 'inflamed the situation'.midjit-gems wrote:http://www.nottinghampost.com/Tom-Crawf ... story.html
Interesting comments by the judge
If I was a PC on the ground there, I would be well pissed off - what force, for gods sake! I think TC got lucky with the judge, he should be thankful for it.
And the spitter apologising - wow! Bet that stuck in her throat.
Any news on what you thought were court papers being served on Haining?
Once again, thanks for taking the trouble to attend and report.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Out of curiosity I popped over to GOODF to see how Tom is being reported these days, forgetting that the moderators had locked the thread ages ago.
Sign of insecurity that is.
Sign of insecurity that is.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:18 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
No have been away, visited Prague for a friends stag do. And I will not delete this post others may so.... if I were you I would read it several times to let it sink in.
If people from Poland are called Poles Why are aren't people from Holland called Holes?
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
I only need to read it once.
Hey, perhaps the mods will delete your post, there must be a rule about grassing surely ?
Hey, perhaps the mods will delete your post, there must be a rule about grassing surely ?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 2:47 pm
- Location: Manchester by day, Slaithwaite by night
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
...Mr Crawford, of Fearn Chase, Carlton.
Wait... what?
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Hoorah, he's back home !mufc1959 wrote:
...Mr Crawford, of Fearn Chase, Carlton.
Wait... what?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Hey Joinder - all these references to rules are wearing a bit thin now, think you have made your point but please can you give it a rest now?
Life is too short to keep harping on about it.
Life is too short to keep harping on about it.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Hey, sorry mate, I posted it without even thinking, I'll have to delete it before I'm caught, thanks.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:18 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
15 TIMES They have told you.
If people from Poland are called Poles Why are aren't people from Holland called Holes?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Yeah - thinking - that's good.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Now now, no flame war please. It was an honest mistake.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
-
- Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
- Posts: 8246
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
- Location: The Evergreen Playground
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
They are posting very hurtful comments. Sadly I'm a sensitive soul who takes these things to heart.
Re: Tom Crawford found not guilty NOTTINGHAM POLICE CORRUPTI
by watsonsdog » Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:30 pm
Someone forgot to say,
up yours quatloosers
Coercion does not equal Consent.
Don't play with the things your not prepared to lose.
watsonsdog
Another night of crying myself to sleep.Re: Tom Crawford found not guilty NOTTINGHAM POLICE CORRUPTI
by watsonsdog » Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:00 pm
ceylon wrote:
3 were in the room and left upset
Not the result they've been expecting
Seems quite over there tonight
Quatloos....................HA HA
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Monika Godos, 34, whose correspondence address is The Wyndings, Woodthorpe, admitted assaulting a policeman during the protest. She apologised after she inadvertently spat in his face. The judge ordered her to pay compensation of £100, a £250 fine, £300 costs and £150 courts charges.midjit-gems wrote:http://www.nottinghampost.com/Tom-Crawf ... story.html
It didn't look very inadvertent to me, but £800 might teach her some manners.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:11 pm
- Location: In a gallery, with Peanuts.
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Burnaby49 wrote:They are posting very hurtful comments. Sadly I'm a sensitive soul who takes these things to heart.
Like a bungalow in Fearn Chase, Carlton. Worth somewhere around 120-140k at a minimum.Re: Tom Crawford found not guilty NOTTINGHAM POLICE CORRUPTI
by watsonsdog » Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:30 pm
Someone forgot to say,
up yours quatloosers
Coercion does not equal Consent.
Don't play with the things your not prepared to lose.
watsonsdog
Like how Tom must feel now he can go back to Fearn Chase and looks, in the words of Jim Bowen, at what he could have won (hint it's not a speedboat).Re: Tom Crawford found not guilty NOTTINGHAM POLICE CORRUPTI
by watsonsdog » Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:00 pm
ceylon wrote:
3 were in the room and left upset
Not the result they've been expecting
Seems quite over there tonight
Quatloos....................HA HA
Another night of crying myself to sleep.
Can't you get Mrs Burnaby to put on that special all in one outfit and do a little dance for you?
Warning may contain traces of nut