The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

[littleFred]

The proceeds of the surrendered EP was paid into the mortgage interest account so I think that means it was netted off against the loan interest and not the capital.

Well, there was just one pot in B&B, not partitioned into separate pots for interest and capital. If Tom/Sue had paid the EP for 25 years, the proceeds would have paid a large sum into the pot, hopefully paying off the £43k or whatever. They stopped very early so the proceeds were only £178.

As the matured policy would repay capital, I think it's fair to say the surrendered policy also repaid some capital.

But it's a trivial point and I'm being too picky. Your essential point, that Tom didn't repay the capital, is correct.

[Hercule Parrot]

Is planning permission needed for a demolition?

The planning authority is responsible for pursuing any breach of permission, and in emergencies they may agree that a dangerous building can be pulled down without fear of action. It is feasible that Notts council has given the nod to this, in order to put an end to the hazardous and costly shenanigans.

[YiamCross]

Is planning permission needed for a demolition?

The planning authority is responsible for pursuing any breach of permission....

Already quoted the actual position from the planning portal, look above for the link.

No planning permission is normally required to demolish a building.

The problems can arise when it comes time to build a new one. So from that point of view it's wise to have your permissions in place before pulling down the building but none is needed for the demolition.

[Normal Wisdom]

Second video attempt. This time with chickens.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0Dbv2JVYQI

Love the background music.

Agreed. My one complaint/criticism would be that the slide at 10:50 reads "Tom hasn't yet get around to letting anyone else see it." To be a pedant for grammar I would feel that "Tom hasn't gotten around to letting anyone else see it yet." would be a better turn of phrase. It's a very minor criticism, otherwise loved the use of red x and green ticks.

And of course Chickens.

"Get" was a typo - should have been "got". I was tired. That's a valid excuse - ask Ceylon. That's why he ditched all his freetard principles and rolled over for the judge.

[Footloose52]

Surely the vendor would still be liable up to completion for any further damage as the property would no longer be as seen at the time of exchange?

It's not sold as seen. You insure it from exchange as a buyer.

You are, of course, correct. I blame my advancing years and the fact I've not dealt in property for many a year.

I still wonder about simultaneous exchange and completion though.

As for insurance what sane insurer will insure this place? And if they do I wouldn't fancy the premiums.

[wanglepin]

Second video attempt. This time with chickens.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0Dbv2JVYQI

Thanks for taking the time to do this Normal.

[Pox]

Surely the vendor would still be liable up to completion for any further damage as the property would no longer be as seen at the time of exchange?

It's not sold as seen. You insure it from exchange as a buyer.

You are, of course, correct. I blame my advancing years and the fact I've not dealt in property for many a year.

I still wonder about simultaneous exchange and completion though.

As for insurance what sane insurer will insure this place? And if they do I wouldn't fancy the premiums.

I recently had to insure a vacant property for a few years. Because the property was unheated (I assume Fearn Chase is the same as the EPC says no heating present) there were that many exclusions I was basically only insured for impact damage and had to check the property every week.

[Jeffrey]

Another day has passed without them showing the warrant.

Time to get up on the roof.

[JonnyL]

Tom Crawford has gone proper freetard now, posting 'Strawman' stuff.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sArXw6ajNg

[Pox]

Tom Crawford has gone proper freetard now, posting 'Strawman' stuff.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sArXw6ajNg

All these videos never show the end of the story.
Why don't the bailiff companies upload the conclusions?

[NG3]

All these videos never show the end of the story.
Why don't the bailiff companies upload the conclusions?

Someone needs to break it down into an almost child like format for them.

"Here is Paul, he bought a house with a mortgage, fell on hard times, sought sensible counsel and still has his home"

"Here is Peter, he also purchased a house with a mortgage & fell on hard times, but Peter was a freetard and this is what happened to him"

Two side by side case studies, step by step, demonstrating the right way, and the wrong way, from common origins to polar opposite conclusions.

[hucknallred]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sArXw6ajNg

I see Dave makes an appearance viewtopic.php?f=52&t=10421
Did he say if he ever got his car back? Couldn't bear to watch any more of it.

[bagman]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sArXw6ajNg

I see Dave makes an appearance viewtopic.php?f=52&t=10421
Did he say if he ever got his car back? Couldn't bear to watch any more of it.

I do remember he did a later video, and he said "as yet (this was about 6 months later) he had not got it back "and he also said "it was like a game of chess, they make a move and he makes a move" i cant remember the video, sorry. It was at one of those free-tard conventions, if i find it i will post the link.

[Bones]

Another day has passed without them showing the warrant.

Time to get up on the roof.

They won't post it, in all its glory. They can't trust that their supporters will once they see if agree with their claims.

Look at the judgement, Tommy was quick enough to declare victory and didn't want to post the judgement as he knew that if any sane person read it, they could only conclude as now evidenced by the lose of his house that he lost.

Now we have the same situation with the Warrant. Lots of claims by Craiggie and A-man-da that the warrant is false etc. Yet after all these weeks of them demanding to see the warrant, now that they have it, it is them that now refuse to show it.

The fact that they have not yet posted it, is enough for me to show that it isn't a fraudulent instrument after all.

[bagman]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sArXw6ajNg

I see Dave makes an appearance viewtopic.php?f=52&t=10421
Did he say if he ever got his car back? Couldn't bear to watch any more of it.

I do remember he did a later video, and he said "as yet (this was about 6 months later) he had not got it back "and he also said "it was like a game of chess, they make a move and he makes a move" i cant remember the video, sorry. It was at one of those free-tard conventions, if i find it i will post the link.

found the video
its called, Did Dave Get His Car Back ? - Podcast of August 2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_0w2LJOvCY
ENJOY

[JonnyL]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sArXw6ajNg

I see Dave makes an appearance viewtopic.php?f=52&t=10421
Did he say if he ever got his car back? Couldn't bear to watch any more of it.

I do remember he did a later video, and he said "as yet (this was about 6 months later) he had not got it back "and he also said "it was like a game of chess, they make a move and he makes a move" i cant remember the video, sorry. It was at one of those free-tard conventions, if i find it i will post the link.

Didn't this Dave guy promote drinking your own piss? I'm sure he did, I remember seeing it on FB ages ago by Commonly Known as Dom AKA Wu Ming. Sorry, due to age of story not got any links.

[bagman]

Didn't this Dave guy promote drinking your own piss? I'm sure he did, I remember seeing it on FB ages ago by Commonly Known as Dom AKA Wu Ming. Sorry, due to age of story not got any links.[/quote]


I think he promoted both drinking piss, and talking shitte.....

[JonnyL]

Didn't this Dave guy promote drinking your own piss? I'm sure he did, I remember seeing it on FB ages ago by Commonly Known as Dom AKA Wu Ming. Sorry, due to age of story not got any links.

I think he promoted both drinking piss, and talking shitte..... [/quote]

[wanglepin]

Didn't this Dave guy promote drinking your own piss?

BRAVE Dave Murphy has spent the past 30 days quite literally on the p*** - consuming nothing but his own urine.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/fe ... 439158.ece
here's a vid Dave getting it down him . I posted about Dave some time ago here>
viewtopic.php?f=47&t=10421
https://vimeo.com/46439758

[JonnyL]

Didn't this Dave guy promote drinking your own piss?

BRAVE Dave Murphy has spent the past 30 days quite literally on the p*** - consuming nothing but his own urine.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/fe ... 439158.ece

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!