I simply has to be ...Colin123 wrote:Well i have to say, he went down easy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h1Y5tD ... freload=10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri-PLARA19Q
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
I simply has to be ...Colin123 wrote:Well i have to say, he went down easy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h1Y5tD ... freload=10
Does it not occurr to Crawford that the most likely reason an elderly lady is in hospital is because she is unwell?YiamCross wrote:one elderly lady was badgered so much by them it actually made her feel ill and she told us all so,
Diving competitions are based on a points system in which divers are scored on factors including execution and degree of difficulty.Normal Wisdom wrote:Colin123 wrote:Well i have to say, he went down easy
Depends who is in court to accurately report the proceedings.guilty wrote: Anyone think that Ceylon is going to show remorse in order to reduce his sentence?
There is at least two of us attending on the 25thPox wrote:Depends who is in court to accurately report the proceedings.guilty wrote: Anyone think that Ceylon is going to show remorse in order to reduce his sentence?
Lucky for us there's a complete absence of intelligenc in any of the defendants. Otherwise what would we do with our evenings? From what I'mhearing about Haining he's not only a cowardly "grass" who abandons his declared principles the moment it looks like they'll get him into trouble but he's a nasty bit of work too. So long as he's with his mates, that is.guilty wrote:Prosecutors for the 8 cases due to return to court will, of course, be collecting evidence from social media, not just the defendants mobile phones. This will indicate to the judge the defendants intent, whether it was an organised group (ie conspiracy) and the defendants attitude to authority and the court system. Any intelligent person would be keeping their mouth shut and their fingers away from the keyboard for the next few months, but I don't suppose that is going to happen.
Anyone think that Ceylon is going to show remorse in order to reduce his sentence?
Me Too!! he is a disgusting creature, a Liar and a Mountebank .....serves the swine right!.rumpelstilzchen wrote:Does it not occurr to Crawford that the most likely reason an elderly lady is in hospital is because she is unwell?YiamCross wrote:one elderly lady was badgered so much by them it actually made her feel ill and she told us all so,
The more I read Crawford's lies the more I am glad that he lost his home.
they cant show it as they need to keep it secret for the court case they are going to winBones wrote:Still no warrant ?
Bones wrote:Still no warrant ?
Dobbing Mark in was a low level to stoop. I think he tried to get Mark ejected from the court in order for Mark not to be able to report the truth. Nasty piece of attempted censorship.YiamCross wrote:guilty wrote: a cowardly "grass"
HAVE YOU SEEN THE CCTV FOOTAGE OF MARK CEYLON PLEADING IN COURT,,,,IDIOT wrote:Dobbing Mark in was a low level to stoop. I think he tried to get Mark ejected from the court in order for Mark not to be able to report the truth. Nasty piece of attempted censorship.YiamCross wrote:guilty wrote: a cowardly "grass"
Grassing someone up is bad enough let alone dobbing him in for something he had no proof of.
That's a great way to help the Crawfords... help them lose their new home, that is.So if the estate agent was to receive multiple anonymous threats that ANYONE who buys this house will never be able to relax as malicious random harassment could occur anytime without warning. I doubt Bradford and Bingley would ever recoup the money they claim it is due or the cost of the repo legal and security action to date. Just imagine if that happened...
The problem with these people is that they've always got a device in one hand recording proceedings. Doesn't help the balance.Jeffrey wrote:
I've seen better acting in soccer matches.
This is what some of us have been on about. Look at the "winners" and "losers":Dr. Caligari wrote:That's a great way to help the Crawfords... help them lose their new home, that is.
ArthurWankspittle wrote:This is what some of us have been on about. Look at the "winners" and "losers":Dr. Caligari wrote:That's a great way to help the Crawfords... help them lose their new home, that is.
B&B owed £45k plus interest, charges and insurance for 2 years £5k? legal costs £20k?
Plus security costs £20k
Plus removals and storage, bits and pieces, £5k?
Tom and Sue's house sold for what? £55k-£60k?
We don't know if Sue's mum made a will nor do we know how many siblings she has who may also inherit. Big assumptions but let's say Sue is the only offspring but mum didn't make a will. Say mum's house is worth £100k-£120k.
So, final account from B&B/ARUK says Tom and Sue owe them £40k. They can force the sale of the house and or petition for bankruptcy for both of them.
Forced sale of Sue's mum's house at £100k, minus some expenses, Tom and Sue come out with £55k-£60k.