John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
JP is now released from hospital and is back making ranty videos with his sycophantic buddy Andy Devine.
If you needed a demonstration as to why he was sectioned then watch a snippet of the linked video. He’s not a very pleasant chap, he doesn’t like the Jews much or at all. He’s also back with the threats to make folk disappear and other horrible nonsense.
If you needed a demonstration as to why he was sectioned then watch a snippet of the linked video. He’s not a very pleasant chap, he doesn’t like the Jews much or at all. He’s also back with the threats to make folk disappear and other horrible nonsense.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 1:21 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
In our local park, there's a crew of street drinkers/drug users who spend all day on the benches spouting angry gibberish at each other. That video is like being trapped on a bench with them.watch a snippet of the linked video.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:38 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
I suppose when someone who isn't Jewish but looks almost identical to the stereotypical Jewish caricature in every anti-Semitic meme since time began, a dislike for Jews to a certain extent is understandable. He has probably been in the past been the victim of assumed anti-Semitism and from this grew his hatred of Jews.exiledscouser wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:55 pm JP is now released from hospital and is back making ranty videos with his sycophantic buddy Andy Devine.
If you needed a demonstration as to why he was sectioned then watch a snippet of the linked video. He’s not a very pleasant chap, he doesn’t like the Jews much or at all. He’s also back with the threats to make folk disappear and other horrible nonsense.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
I think you are looking for excuses when none are required. He's a violent racist little sh!t. Simples.daltontrumbno wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 7:40 am I suppose when someone who isn't Jewish but looks almost identical to the stereotypical Jewish caricature in every anti-Semitic meme since time began, a dislike for Jews to a certain extent is understandable. He has probably been in the past been the victim of assumed anti-Semitism and from this grew his hatred of Jews.
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4806
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
He has a point now I come to think of it. Paterson could walk through St John's Wood and people would ask "Who's that Jewish looking bloke?"
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Is he the guy who appears in a video initially looking undamaged, then later on with a busted nose?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
That is indeed him. I think the police are still trying to find the pixies in his head who assaulted him.
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4806
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Some passing person of the Hebrew persuasion giving him a well deserved twatting?AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 9:45 am That is indeed him. I think the police are still trying to find the pixies in his head who assaulted him.
I believe current best theory is self inflicted injury is it not?
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Indeed. I believe I have managed to get hold of the CCTV footage from outside Southwark Crown Court.
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
I think this thread needs a picture ..
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
lol. WWTDDAnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:38 amIndeed. I believe I have managed to get hold of the CCTV footage from outside Southwark Crown Court.