Ah, the Magic of Latin. It's the Words of Power that will defeat Them every time.Learning the Latin and representing ourselves is progression I would advocate!!!...
I see some snags in this plan. The private prosecution must be based on some real law being broken, or at least alledgedly broken, and there must be adequate evidence to support the case, just like a public prosecution. You cannot do a private prosecution with private law known only to the prosecutors. Given the amount of pseudo-law they embrace, this seems something of a hurdle.Private Prosecutions for all and then clean up with Civil Damages. We are currently trying to work with some lawyers on this at the moment and are making good progress.
Also, since they seem to think all cases but theirs are fraudulent, and all judges in cahoots with the PTB, why should they trust the courts?
As a last line of defense, the CPS can take over any private prosecution and simply discontinue it.
Their chance of reaching the civil damages stage seem slim.
That may have had something to do with the obviously fraudulent nature of the undervalue 'sale' to Tunkashila and its declaration as such by the Chancery court.They removed our RQ (Co) restriction without notice, without any attempt to object and our restriction ranked first in priority but that didnt stop them just deleting it and putting through the fraudulent sale.
In the entire history of freeloaders and scofflaws that I have reviewed, I do not recall anyone saying 'Yes, that is a genuine writ' when shown one. Funny, that.