The Crawfords Keep Looking For A Unicorn

[notorial dissent]

Bad taste will do. The very idea.

[Philistine]

Ok, this whole chip spice thing is silly. It's called seasoned salt and has been a thing in the America's for decades.
One of the most common is Lawry's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawry%27s_Seasoned_Salt
https://www.mccormick.com/lawrys/flavor ... soned-salt
I've used that stuff on beef, chicken, seafood, and yes, chips/fries my whole life.
As a matter of fact, I sent a bottle to my MIL in Cornwall a few years ago as I couldn't believe it wasn't at Morrison's or Lidl's.

[Chaos]

As long as chip spice supplies remain uninterrupted, I'll be a happy man.

is that the unknown brother of the spice girls?

[SteveUK]

As an ex long time resident of Philly, I can say it's just like Bay Seasoning.

[grixit]

..... and his head is now on the face of the quatloos dollar.

Sorry to have to correct you but a Quatloos is a unit of currency. Tom's head will appear on the one Quatloos as soon as we can find a way to print it on a rubber equilateral triangle with 6800 mile sides.

Ah, but Frikintardistan has "stamp money", time limited scrip issued as needed. Tom Crawford stamps are way past their expiration date and are now worthless except to collectors. Or to sovs who need a stamp to make their document extraspecially legalific.

[radcliffewreck]

My take is that Craig is a telemarketing scammer wannabe who can't find or hold any kind of real job, even minimum wage would probably be better than what he is pulling in, and I get the impression he isn't really competent at anything or anything marketable. I think Da is just an opportunistic old fool grasping at straws. If someone told him that worshiping giant purple men from Alpha Praxis would vindicate him he'd probably do it.

Here he is hard at work , the guy in the background white 't' shirt.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW3CZre ... zK&index=1

[notorial dissent]

My take is that Craig is a telemarketing scammer wannabe who can't find or hold any kind of real job, even minimum wage would probably be better than what he is pulling in, and I get the impression he isn't really competent at anything or anything marketable. I think Da is just an opportunistic old fool grasping at straws. If someone told him that worshiping giant purple men from Alpha Praxis would vindicate him he'd probably do it.

Here he is hard at work , the guy in the background white 't' shirt.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW3CZre ... zK&index=1

Nice to know he's finally found something worthy of his talents.

[LurkerRob]

Craig tows the family line.

Every month we edge closer to winning... to the point we have found countless others that it has happened to!

They've spent over £1.500.000 fighting us in and out of the courts...

Including taking myself and Five other great people to court... some of us represented ourselves and beat one of the top barristers from the cps when they ended up withdrawing...

We have proof its all fraudulent and even a letter from a judge saying the crown prosecution service cant obtain nor ever had the legal documents to prove the house we were battling for was taken legally. Nor that it was never paid off... And that its not my parents home.

This was insane, to think they can’t obtain the KEY element in proving that taking the house was lawful

https://www.facebook.com/craig.crawford ... 7378103375

[Gregg]

Craig tows the family line.

Every month we edge closer to winning... to the point we have found countless others that it has happened to!

They've spent over £1.500.000 fighting us in and out of the courts...

Including taking myself and Five other great people to court... some of us represented ourselves and beat one of the top barristers from the cps when they ended up withdrawing...

We have proof its all fraudulent and even a letter from a judge saying the crown prosecution service cant obtain nor ever had the legal documents to prove the house we were battling for was taken legally. Nor that it was never paid off... And that its not my parents home.

This was insane, to think they can’t obtain the KEY element in proving that taking the house was lawful

https://www.facebook.com/craig.crawford ... 7378103375

In the context that letter actually means, I could just as easily have a letter from a judge saying the same thing about Chili Dog. Not bothering to try to prove a negative in order to prosecute a nuisance charge in court doesn't mean the house belongs to a dachshund. It means that even though you're costing them £1.500.000, they didn't even bother to swat that fly. They sure had the Judge write a pretty damning judgement in the actual court case when that was the germane issue. They never bring up that judgement.

[aesmith]

Did they ever mention why they thought the CPS would have seen or held any of these documents, did they think the CPS had any involvement with the possession or eviction?

[SteveUK]

3 years of always being just about to win and blow it all apart. How they can take such a massive loss and still think they'll win 3 years on is beyond me.
Craig thinks their new evidence will cause a stink bigger than the PPI mess. Hmmm.

[aesmith]

Remember these are the guys who read Judge Godsmark's judgement, and thought it meant they'd won.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

Craig thinks their new evidence will cause a stink bigger than the PPI mess. Hmmm.

I think he's referring to the interest only mortgage scandal, and yes it could be bigger, but probably won't be.

In 1990 a friend of mine was sold an endowment mortgage. He was actually told that it would not only pay his mortgage but leave him with money left over. I don't think that that was unusual. It was shoddy business practice. However, by 1998 when I got mortgage, companies were wary of giving endowment mortgages, scared off by the then recent scandal of missold pensions. (Companies involved in pension and endowment selling then switched to PPI and critical health insurance for their get rich quick schemes, but that's another story.)

I believe that most reputable companies conducted reviews and offered to convert endowment mortgages to repayment. For some, this would have meant a huge hike in monthly payments and they declined. However, I think as long as the mortgage companies can show that they did try to remedy the situation and fully informed their customer of the risks of not doing so, they are "okay".

For some people, (buy to let, property developers, self-employed etc.) interest only mortgages are a product they require and are aware of the risks, so banning them outright isn't really sensible or required.

Where the Crawfords went wrong is, whilst they may have initially had a point, it is clear from the evidence that has come out that their mortgage company did try to remedy their situation which they refused - as was their right. The law doesn't protect one from stupidity.

Where we could be hearing more of this is that a mid-nineties endowment mortgage would soon be reaching maturity. I have seen a few newspaper articles referring to this, but they all seem to involve people over 75 unable to extend or remortgage.

[ArthurWankspittle]

Every month we edge closer to winning... to the point we have found countless others that it has happened to!
No proof. No details of these others.
They've spent over £1.500.000 fighting us in and out of the courts...
No proof.
Including taking myself and Five other great people to court... some of us represented ourselves and beat one of the top barristers from the cps when they ended up withdrawing...
No proof of "top barristers"
We have proof its all fraudulent and even a letter from a judge saying the crown prosecution service cant obtain nor ever had the legal documents to prove the house we were battling for was taken legally. Nor that it was never paid off... And that its not my parents home.
No one prosecuting needs to prove who owns the house. If you are claiming it is yours therefore no criminal damage could occur, then you failed to prove that, didn't you? And it wasn't paid off. And it isn't your parents home.
This was insane, to think they can’t obtain the KEY element in proving that taking the house was lawful
https://www.facebook.com/craig.crawford ... 7378103375

In the context that letter actually means, I could just as easily have a letter from a judge saying the same thing about Chili Dog. Not bothering to try to prove a negative in order to prosecute a nuisance charge in court doesn't mean the house belongs to a dachshund. It means that even though you're costing them £1.500.000, they didn't even bother to swat that fly. They sure had the Judge write a pretty damning judgement in the actual court case when that was the germane issue. They never bring up that judgement.

Yeah, not bothering to prove a negative, let's start with can you prove Tom isn't deluded, bitter and mistaken?

[MaritalArtist]

No proof it wasn't paid off? Didn't Tom admit he was £40k short when he went on GOODF asking if he could pay it off by promissory note? I know the post has since been deleted, but if anyone has a screenshot, that would be cool.

[JimUk1]

He still admits it here-

https://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/ ... 8&start=10

. Thank you Zarkie, We don't have a court hearing as my first post explains, we just have to keep paying till the 25 years are up, four month time, then they will require us to pay infull the mortgage that we took out 25 years ago.

[doublelong]

Spotted this comment from Tom on his first video a few weeks ago when I was introducing a work colleague to FMOTL .
“Hi Charley,
Thank you for your kind offer, but no thanks, we turned down an estimated crowdfunding of £1.5mil, as we are not willing to give these criminals any of our money, we do not want goodhearted people to give their hard earned money to these criminals, but thank you once again for the offer.
Cheers Tom”
So if you divide 1.5 million by 600, that’s the number of people who turned up to the second eviction, in reality it, was probably not that high. Each person would have to cough up £2500! Seems the father passed on the financial exaggeration gene to his son.
Don’t know how to post a screen shot here but it is his first video just change the comments to newest first.

[notorial dissent]

It would seem that "edging closer" has a considerably different meaning in Crawfraudese than it does in the mother tongue. Still the same old fantasy, still the same old line of BS.

[hucknallred]

Just noticed another business he's CEO of after the teeth thing

http://paranormalpursuituk.com/

Incomplete website flogging £35 a time tickets to a ghost event in Mansfield.

[TheNewSaint]

Just noticed another business he's CEO of after the teeth thing

http://paranormalpursuituk.com/

Incomplete website flogging £35 a time tickets to a ghost event in Mansfield.

And yet, it's a better draw than a showing of The Great British Mortgage Swindle.