I thought it was but with what LF has posted, it looks like I was mistakenslowsmile wrote: Are you sure that's Robswift?
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
I thought it was but with what LF has posted, it looks like I was mistakenslowsmile wrote: Are you sure that's Robswift?
I have a feeling Ceylon won't care, as WeRe Bank isn't being promoted so much on GOODF, I think that particular revenue stream has dried upwanglepin wrote:I do hope Mark Haining Ceylon is reading your last four posts Bones. I am only sorry bertiebert isn't around to see the shite that he and Haining have both helped to create.Bones wrote:Robswift and Maurkee from GOODF having a bit on a love'in session on WeRe Bank Forum
It was my understanding that Pof E couldn't wait to go to court to defend the legitimacy of his cheques and his is bank (freeman legal services and all that). It seems he has the perfect platform to show his members how it is done. But no doubt, like those other tossers, Santos and Menard, he will steer well clear of any court room is my bet.
It will be interesting if Haining is at tomorrows meeting - somebody in Nottingham has organised it - PoE doesn't organise his own meetings.Bones wrote: I have a feeling Ceylon won't care, as WeRe Bank isn't being promoted so much on GOODF, I think that particular revenue stream has dried up
I should cite my source: WeRe private forum, "Posting on GOODF" thread.littleFred wrote:RobSwift is 150976SR.
I could tell him what it should be that disturbs him greatly..... but..... he won't believe me:170959MM @werebank wrote:And, as I write this, there is something else, which I can neither put my finger on nor satisfactorily articulate, but it disturbs me greatly;
Yup... even after all he's faced, he's still not ready to face the reality that PoE sold him snake oil.170959MM @werebank wrote:I sincerely want WeRe Bank and Peter to succeed, but it is of vital priority that our members are supported in the court room environment.
Motorhead is a guy called Rob Nevers in New Brunswick, Canada. He has his own discussion on Quatloos;slowsmile wrote:Are you sure that's Robswift?Bones wrote:Robswift and Maurkee from GOODF having a bit on a love'in session on WeRe Bank Forum
When he first introduced himself on their forum he says he's from New Brunswick, Canada.
http://www.werebank.com/forum/viewtopic ... f3ac2#p619
He's also used the sig motorheadv10 beneath Rob - and there does appear to be a person active on a few websites with that handle.
https://www.thingiverse.com/motorheadv10/about
Just read through that whole post, and to see him now falling for the Weary scam - AFTER already getting his arse handed to him on a silver platter (with all the trimmings) - is possibly one of the saddest things I've ever read, especially given that he seemed so close to seeing the light.
Motorhead is a guy called Rob Nevers in New Brunswick, Canada. He has his own discussion on Quatloos;
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=10309
He's going from one disaster to another.
So sad to think that someone could be a fan of Douglas Adams and be that dumb.Bones wrote:170959MM @werebank forum
Unread postby 170959MM » Fri Aug 21, 2015 12:56 am
“I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.” Douglas Adams, The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul.
I don't think this is a case of a dim bulb, I feel it is more of a case of someone forgetting to turn the light on at birthnotorial dissent wrote:I'd say 170959MM had a bit of a day, and the poor dear is so utterly bewildered that his pretty pieces of paper are worthless and not being accepted and he just doesn't understand, he rebutted their claims and stuff, WAAAHHH!
The dim bulb still doesn't get it either I'm willing to bet.
It is just simply unbelievable how these people go about their daily lives and the approach they take. Council Tax is even acknowledged on Goofy as being the most difficult one to avoid paying, not least because of the possible heavy penalties for not doing so, but that does not stop this moron sending in a fraudulent cheque to "pay" his/hers. Even more bizarrely they find it amusing when the Council call the cheque fraudulent, and then to top that pick holes in the arrears letter they get sent, they are obsessed with signatures but this complaint tops the lot :-Bones wrote:I really don't understand when they have multiple cheques returned, why don't they stop for a second and think hold on this werebank is just a load of BS
As has been said they will find fault with anything. Bet they do not complain about "Dodgy paper" when their Housing Benefit is involved or race to tell them it has not been signed.Dodgy council scanned headed paper
If its out of tax by three months you'd be better calling nottigham City council vehicle pound. They remove and impound untaxed vehicles on behalf of the dvla. This would be a much bigger headache for Peter than a supermarket car park fine which he'd just ignore (if it could even find him!)Bones wrote:I really don't understand when they have multiple cheques returned, why don't they stop for a second and think hold on this werebank is just a load of BS
On a side note, Peter talks about he RV being potentially parked in Sainsbury's car park all day today.
1) Didn't we establish before that the RV was either not taxed or MOT'ed (can't recall which) ?
2) Doesn't Sainsbury's have a time limit for parking ?
3) As he still has his RV, why was he staying in peoples homes for some of the previous meetings and living it up in a travelodge ?
Referring to a vehicle as an "RV" is uncommon in British English and I read "The RV will be on Sainsburys car park" as meaning rendezvous.Bones wrote:On a side note, Peter talks about he RV being potentially parked in Sainsbury's car park all day today.