Thank God that his interview was at the start. If I had to listen through to the end I would need to lay down in a dark room for a few hours.
Supposedly, he was told that his name and that of other freeman nutters is included in a 'Black List Dossier' held by the Courts. He considers that this is discrimination under the Equalities Act.
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
Back from working away and it’s all kicked off, as usual. It’s like the 400+ emails waiting for you on your return although Q stuff I actually read through rather than simply delete or ignore.
I’ve read the latest developments in the GT thread and his appeal nonsense. His appeal either succeeded (the conviction was overturned) or it didn’t (and the conviction stands). It’s a simple outcome and ‘no case to answer’ isn’t one of them.
I listened to the YT interview and "Our Guy in Weatherspoons" doesn’t actually tell us the outcome, just waffles on.
So come on Guy, either your appeal succeeded or it didn’t.
Personally I wouldn’t put myself on offer and involve myself in court/police problems (largely it seems of Guy’s own making) in the first place. Time on remand, cops knocking at the door at all hours, stress and strain for other family members, it’s all very selfish and narcissistic.
Whether he won his appeal or not, he’s had a rough ride through the criminal justice system and all he’s got to show for it is an interview with Brian and Mike.
Time to grow up Guy and stop fucking your life up.
A quick call to Swansea Crown Court confirms Guy had his appeal against an affray conviction upheld. His appeal against the contempt conviction (for which he was recently imprisoned) was however dismissed.
Ridiculous as he is, hats off to him for a partial victory.
houseoflard wrote:A quick call to Swansea Crown Court confirms Guy had his appeal against an affray conviction upheld. His appeal against the contempt conviction (for which he was recently imprisoned) was however dismissed.
Ridiculous as he is, hats off to him for a partial victory !!!!1!!!.
I corrected your post for you as you left of a very important part.
I would have to disagree and say that it was not even a partial victory. If he didn't try all that freetard rubbish in the first place, the chances are he would not have been found guilty and he would not have had to spend time in prison for no other reason than he is an idiot
GUY TAYLOR ............WINS HIS APPEAL........ IN SWANSEA CROWN COURT WITH .............NO CASE TO ANSWER !!!
WE WILL BE PUTTING A VIDEO OUT SHORTLY WITH A COMPLETE BREAKDOWN OF THE EVENTS IN AND OUT OF THE TRIAL AT SWANSEA CROWN COURT.
AMONGST OTHER THINGS WE HAVE NOW UNCOVERED AND CAN REVEAL HOW THE COURT SYSTEM HAS A DOSSIER ON ANYONE THEY CONSIDER "DIFFICULT" AND ACTIVELY DISCRIMINATE AND PREPARE FOR THESE COURT CASES UNDER THE GUISE OF HEALTH AND SAFETY.
ANYONE LEGITIMATELY QUESTIONING THE COURT SYSTEM, GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS, COUNCIL ETC IS LABELED "A FREEMAN" AND WILL FIND THEMSELVES BLACKBALLED AND IN ...."THE FREEMAN FILES"
Anyway to get more details. Could the video of the encounter have disproven the "afray" claims, or could the appeal have been upheld based on the failure to produce the security video? Or was it as was suggested, Guy Taylor's son that was involved in the fight and not Guy Taylor, and that was confirmed by the video?
In either case, prosecutors need to be more careful. They botched the Rooftop 6 trial and now they've botched this. Now these idiots have "confirmation" that "no case to answer" makes them immune from prosecution.
mac wrote:Coming soon according to his Facebook Page
GUY TAYLOR ............WINS HIS APPEAL........ IN SWANSEA CROWN COURT WITH .............NO CASE TO ANSWER !!!
WE WILL BE PUTTING A VIDEO OUT SHORTLY WITH A COMPLETE BREAKDOWN OF THE EVENTS IN AND OUT OF THE TRIAL AT SWANSEA CROWN COURT.
AMONGST OTHER THINGS WE HAVE NOW UNCOVERED AND CAN REVEAL HOW THE COURT SYSTEM HAS A DOSSIER ON ANYONE THEY CONSIDER "DIFFICULT" AND ACTIVELY DISCRIMINATE AND PREPARE FOR THESE COURT CASES UNDER THE GUISE OF HEALTH AND SAFETY.
ANYONE LEGITIMATELY QUESTIONING THE COURT SYSTEM, GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS, COUNCIL ETC IS LABELED "A FREEMAN" AND WILL FIND THEMSELVES BLACKBALLED AND IN ...."THE FREEMAN FILES"
Did this ever happen or is it like Amanda and the warrant
"No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we require him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right; not asked as a favor."
- President Theodore Roosevelt
