I have had many Youtube discussions with him in the past. Like many freemen, he doesn't challenge the established beliefs. And like most freemen, he doesn't possess logic or critical thought. He merely regurgitates the established freeman beliefs that were taught to him. The "officer" belief comes from Porisky. The "includes" belief comes from Menard (though I could be mistaken).Burnaby49 wrote:He got on to that beloved Freeman belief that the word "includes" means "includes only the following" so when the definition of employee included an officer it meant only officers were employees.
This was how I was able to eventually see my way through all the crap - I challenge the established beliefs. I downloaded 14 different law dictionaries, and went out and bought a Canadian law dictionary. I cross-referenced all the definitions, and was eventually I was able to tell John Spirit that he is full of crap !!! This was 2 years ago - and he still hasn't progressed in his way of thinking. They merely choose to believe what they want to believe, and block anyone who challenges or disproves those beliefs. Sad really.