Those same people probably still practice bleeding to eliminate foul spirits from the blood and cupping to treat maladies of the chest.Imalawman wrote:Ah yes, another example of tax protesters never learning to shepardize their cases. I actually get Wilcox cited a lot in my pro se embezzlement cases. They're shocked to learn that it isn't good law.LPC wrote:Of course, Burton got to write the majority opinion in Rutkin v. United States, 343 U.S. 130 (1952), which held that the proceeds of extortion were taxable income, and the court in James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213 (1961), held that Rutkin had "thoroughly devitalized" and "effectively vitiated" the Wilcox decision.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)