Someone needs to have a word in her shell like...I need help in Canada Australia and New Zealand. It will only grow to more Commonwealth Countries. Since Canada joined the fight, things have really started to move fast.
![Snicker :snicker:](./images/smilies/icon_snicker.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Someone needs to have a word in her shell like...I need help in Canada Australia and New Zealand. It will only grow to more Commonwealth Countries. Since Canada joined the fight, things have really started to move fast.
What bastards. Maliciously using lower case to confuse the eejits.Paul Evans
Question for those more enlightened than me.
I understand our corporate legal fictional persona names are in upper case so as to distinguish us from our living breathing flesh and blood man or woman. Also a corporation can only speak to us via the upper case names.
However I am receiving correspondence from a court where my name is in lower case. So we have a situation where the corps-oration (a dead corporate entity) is attempting to contact the living breathing flesh and blood man (me).
Is the court breaking any laws?
Thanks.
She was a member of the Footler vs Trolls group and flounced off in a huff when I pointed out the many obvious flaws in basing your legal theories on an 804 year old treaty between French war-lords that was in effect for less than six months and started a war.AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2019 6:32 pmSomeone needs to have a word in her shell like...I need help in Canada Australia and New Zealand. It will only grow to more Commonwealth Countries. Since Canada joined the fight, things have really started to move fast.![]()
Skipping the gibberish advice but you can read it all here .. https://www.facebook.com/groups/practic ... 731509182/Gareth Wilkinson
October 21 at 7:33 PM
I will try to re-word my original post and see if it gets accepted this time ......
I’m due in court on 31/10/19 for a parking fine dispute ......
I have since learned of article 61, do I write to the court b4 the hearing and put them on notice ?, would this be the correct processs ?
Would appreciate any thoughts from this group
Gareth Wilkinson Lazarus Laurence I sent my conditional acceptance via email and Royal Mail Special delivery signed for by the judge and the litigation department for Excel parking services. I never attended their fake court, then recieved this the other day as their decision. CCJ issued and they refer to the notice of conditional acceptance as a substansive witness statement on the detail of the CCJ. What do you suggest is my next step lawful dissenters ?
Issue an unconditional acceptance to undo the conditional acceptance.Gareth Wilkinson Lazarus Laurence I sent my conditional acceptance via email and Royal Mail Special delivery signed for by the judge and the litigation department for Excel parking services. I never attended their fake court, then recieved this the other day as their decision. CCJ issued and they refer to the notice of conditional acceptance as a substansive witness statement on the detail of the CCJ. What do you suggest is my next step lawful dissenters ?
Indeed, Excel usually roll over when they realise they have somebody clued up on the PPC business model. Unfortunately a whole generation(s) of people think the answer to all problems is available from Facebook.
And many councils too. The pavement outside my flat is private property. Doesn't stop the wardens ticketing cars. I have a print out of the land registry plot which I stick under the wiper blades of people who I spot getting caught, but I suspect I miss some.hucknallred wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:16 pm Indeed, Excel usually roll over when they realise they have somebody clued up on the PPC business model.
I have to ask, as I commonly hear about both. Are traffic wardens constables?AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2019 6:35 pmAnd many councils too. The pavement outside my flat is private property. Doesn't stop the wardens ticketing cars. I have a print out of the land registry plot which I stick under the wiper blades of people who I spot getting caught, but I suspect I miss some.hucknallred wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:16 pm Indeed, Excel usually roll over when they realise they have somebody clued up on the PPC business model.
There is good advice, and then there is FOTLer advice!
No. The law changed over a decade ago. Traffic wardens no longer exist per se.
This is the Magna Carta (article 61) and I claim my 5 groats.longdog wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2019 11:53 pmShe was a member of the Footler vs Trolls group and flounced off in a huff when I pointed out the many obvious flaws in basing your legal theories on an 804 year old treaty between French war-lords that was in effect for less than six months and started a war.AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2019 6:32 pmSomeone needs to have a word in her shell like...I need help in Canada Australia and New Zealand. It will only grow to more Commonwealth Countries. Since Canada joined the fight, things have really started to move fast.![]()
She was expecting another echo chamber bless her little cotton socks.
Looks like he's been fined for failing to comply with an enforcement notice. The previous maximum was £25,000 but it is no longer set by scale, but in reference to assets. Where he should be worried is that it has moved from the magistrates to the Crown Court who do have the power to impose an unlimited fine! Refusing to co-operate with the process to determine what level the fine should be is a separate offence.Siharath Phouthone It's next to my house. I have a case against them too. They arrested me without a warrant for using my private garden without their permission as I wrote to them (recorded delivery) asking for the proof if such warrant exists but still no answer.
My case has been pleaded guilty by their treasonous court with fake jury working for Serco.
Is any of you will come to join me?
More details:
They did arrest me for solving my house subsidence issue by myself that they refuse their planning permission but authorise the company they have contracted with to do it next door.
I filmed them (youtube.com/watch?v=56Igk_7XdcY&lc).
They handcuff me, brought me to Private Serco Stinky cell before to be summoned at Wimbledon Magistrate Court. When they took me to Court, the first words I said: "I do not consent" "I claim Common Law", The Magna Carta", "Natural Law", "Constitutional Law", the "Bill of Rights"
As I study all types of Laws here: Natural Liberties Rights, Common Law (all in the Green Box), and Commercial (all in the red box) what is the difference?
● facebook.com/seawapa.org/posts/10220932216078325
● http://bit.ly/CommonLaws-v2
They discharge me immediately without condition and escalate my case to another Foreign, fictitious, not licenced, not under Oath of Aggeliance run people, ...
They charge me anyway,
I sent them your form that I copy here preformatted in PDF Format for mass distribution: http://bit.ly/lawnotice1. Word format for mass distribution: http://bit.ly/lawnotice2
Now they ask me again to go back to give them money:
Here is a copy of paper they sent me:
=============================================
R v SIHARATH - T20190168 (They use R as Regina, a death Person against me)
UPON the Defendant being convicted of an offence under section 179 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (I do not consent) AND UPON the Defendant declining to reveal his financial circumstances PURSUANT TO SECTION 162 Criminal Justice Act 2003
IT IS ORDERED THAT
(1) The Defendant is to file at Court a statement of his means and assets, wherever held, in advance of the adjourned sentencing hearing on Friday 29th November at 10.00 am
(2) Any question of costs adjourned to be dealt with at the same time.
=============================================
Meanwhile, PHOUTHONE SIHARATH has signed the Power of Attorney to Phouthone Siharath transferring all assets in PHOUTHONE SIHARATH name to Phouthone Siharath with immediate effect.
I need as many people as possible to come to assist me. In exchange, I have a big project to deal with them and you will gain it too and we will discuss together: bit.ly/hydro-solved
Please come to: Kingston Crown Court | Kingston| KT1 2BB On Friday 29th November at 10.00 am
He's assigned his assets from the strawman to the natural man, the idea being that the government can take all the action against the strawman they want and it won't affect the natural man. Mr. Natural can stand aside and watch it all because it doesn't affect him, only the fake, government created entity with his name in all capitals.But, he has a cunning plan. He has assigned all his assets to himself, er, his strawman in an attempt to avoid. This will not end well. He's on the path to raising that fine from level 3 (£1,000) to level 4 (£2,500), for the failure to co-operate and still get fined for the failure to enforce.
What couldn't!!!!!JimUk1 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:22 pm Wow. 28 pages of pure gibberish.
Using an old Telegraph article as a source of evidence and references to a 804 year old treaty, what could possibly go wrong?
I really hope this isn’t the guy in question-
https://mobile.twitter.com/seawapa?lang=en-gb
He’s off the chart with craziness.
A climate change sceptic who thinks the 1922 committee and ERG are working for the Jesuits and (bizzarely enough) supports the Gilets Jaunes.JimUk1 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:22 pm Wow. 28 pages of pure gibberish.
Using an old Telegraph article as a source of evidence and references to a 804 year old treaty, what could possibly go wrong?
I really hope this isn’t the guy in question-
https://mobile.twitter.com/seawapa?lang=en-gb
He’s off the chart with craziness.
A big slap from reality is the likeliest outcome....notorial dissent wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:01 amWhat couldn't!!!!!JimUk1 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:22 pm Wow. 28 pages of pure gibberish.
Using an old Telegraph article as a source of evidence and references to a 804 year old treaty, what could possibly go wrong?
I really hope this isn’t the guy in question-
https://mobile.twitter.com/seawapa?lang=en-gb
He’s off the chart with craziness.![]()
Jacquie Phoenix shared a post.
21 November at 14:36
David Robinson has already shown us that it is possible to seize buildings using Article 61 This is the new Canadian banner for lawful building seizures. We will be making one for the UK to use. Australia and New Zealand will get one too. I hope that you will join us in the push to take back the Commonwealth. I will be teaching the other groups how to lay the groundwork necessary for lawful building seizures. United we stand.
Jacquie Phoenix The only way we can lawfully do that is by laying the groundwork for building seizures. We are currently organizing a mass building seizure throughout the Commonwealth. I will be teaching people how to do the necessary groundwork to do this. If we Unite and do this on mass it will cripple the Treasonous Regime and grind everything to a halt. They will have no choice but to listen to us.