JonnyL wrote:Can't we just toss a coin for it and the loser gets the house.
![Laugh :haha:](./images/smilies/005.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
JonnyL wrote:Can't we just toss a coin for it and the loser gets the house.
This her? A bit ugly even for Ceylong.vampireLOREN wrote:Its Kirsty Haining and the pic is the same as the posting on Craigs shown here.
My "see my prior note" comment referred to my comment about YiamCross putting up a Facebook link to a woman who was pretty obviously the wrong person then insulting her to boot. I doubt Ceylon's friends chatter on FB about book sales.Burnaby, I did, I have.....but I still cannot get the FB page to post. Its sad but true.vampireLOREN wrote:This her? A bit ugly even for Ceylong.vampireLOREN wrote:Its Kirsty Haining and the pic is the same as the posting on Craigs shown here.
Yiam.......NO NO NO that poor lady is not her, FB search and find her I don't know how to share the page.
Burnaby49 Note - See my prior post
What "contractual obligation"? The endowment policy never matured, of course. If Sue had continued paying it to maturity, it would (probably) have paid off the mortgage, with any spare cash going to Tom and Sue. But the bank wouldn't have paid anyone. Who would it "repay the outstanding capital" to? To itself?... after Tom and Sue paid their endowment mortgage for 25 years and the bank reneged on its contractual obligation to repay the outstanding capital at the maturity of that endowment policy.
No facility for comments. No surprise there, can't have anyone pasting facts all overy his website.littleFred wrote:Michael Waugh's Britain 2015: A Fully-Fledged Fascist Police State is the usual pompous junk. I was slightly intrigued by:What "contractual obligation"? The endowment policy never matured, of course. If Sue had continued paying it to maturity, it would (probably) have paid off the mortgage, with any spare cash going to Tom and Sue. But the bank wouldn't have paid anyone. Who would it "repay the outstanding capital" to? To itself?... after Tom and Sue paid their endowment mortgage for 25 years and the bank reneged on its contractual obligation to repay the outstanding capital at the maturity of that endowment policy.
As usual, Michael's rhetoric sounds impressive but is garbage.
Waugh appears to be making the ludicrous claim that the bank was the one that was responsible for paying off the policy or capital. The judge discusses it in paragraphs 69 to 74 of the judgement:after Tom and Sue paid their endowment mortgage for 25 years and the bank reneged on its contractual obligation to repay the outstanding capital at the maturity of that endowment policy.
I should add that not only can I see no legal basis for any such responsibility on the part of Bradford & Bingley, but also the Ombudsman could find no basis for imposing any such responsibility when rejecting the Crawfords’ 2013 complaint.
Tom cashed in the endowment part of the policy three years into the life of the mortgage so his point is mute anyway. But it is like anything in Loonyville, if the answer does not suit, make one up and make the answer so complicated the residents of Loonyville will not understand it and simply believe it. It is like Tom and his so called Warrant writ, its a warrant he has already seen but he wants to see a fresh copy so he can find something else wrong with it, they could wrap it in gold and get every judge up and down the land to sign it and dot wax seals over it, but he and his fellow residents in Loonyville would still find something wrong with it. The loonies on the roof demanding to see said warrant, let them see it and someone would yell "arrest that Occifer for showing me a private document" Loonyville is a very strange placeJeffrey wrote:Waugh appears to be making the ludicrous claim that the bank was the one that was responsible for paying off the policy or capital. The judge discusses it in paragraphs 69 to 74 of the judgement:after Tom and Sue paid their endowment mortgage for 25 years and the bank reneged on its contractual obligation to repay the outstanding capital at the maturity of that endowment policy.
I should add that not only can I see no legal basis for any such responsibility on the part of Bradford & Bingley, but also the Ombudsman could find no basis for imposing any such responsibility when rejecting the Crawfords’ 2013 complaint.
Have you got a link to view the delectable Kirstey?vampireLOREN wrote:I had a nosey moment and checked out her FB page, She looks the quiet retiring typeHercule Parrot wrote:YiamCross wrote:What Kirstey Haining doesn't understand is that only the straw man gets the phone call.[/quote
How does she know he didn't get a phone call? He might've used it to call someone else......Tattoo on her right breast
, imagine getting to know her and she takes you to meet Dad
Losleones wrote:[I had a nosey moment and checked out her FB page, She looks the quiet retiring typeHercule Parrot wrote:YiamCross wrote:What Kirstey Haining doesn't understand is that only the straw man gets the phone call.[/quote
How does she know he didn't get a phone call? He might've used it to call someone else......Tattoo on her right breast
, imagine getting to know her and she takes you to meet Dad
The link has been correctly deleted because there is some doubt as to whether it is in fact Ceylons daughter. Having seen the page i concur, she comes across as intelligent for a start.Have you got a link to view the delectable Kirstey?
Ahhh, then it's definitely not pig tail's sprog for sureSkeleton wrote:she comes across as intelligent for a start.
Having a nosey around the various Facebook accounts last night for the main 'supporters' it would appear that many may have spent the day 'spring cleaning' their posts to remove any incriminating posts.Skeleton wrote:
The link has been correctly deleted because there is some doubt as to whether it is in fact Ceylons daughter. Having seen the page i concur, she comes across as intelligent for a start.
Family members i tend to steer clear of unless they have any direct involvement, Kirk it appears, having looked at his page would appear to be a chip off the old block so good find.Bungle wrote:Having a nosey around the various Facebook accounts last night for the main 'supporters' it would appear that many may have spent the day 'spring cleaning' their posts to remove any incriminating posts.Skeleton wrote:
The link has been correctly deleted because there is some doubt as to whether it is in fact Ceylons daughter. Having seen the page i concur, she comes across as intelligent for a start.
Having Ceylon as a father would naturally ensure that the offspring follow in the FMoTL tradition and this is confirmed when reading his son's Facebook page and looking at the groups that he is a member of. His name is Kirk M Haining.
Oh yes, "commonly known as" Kirk is deeply immersed in the FMoTL woo. In fact, he used the argument that statute law didn't apply to him back in 2011 when attempting to defend a charge of growing 43 cannabis plants. He was, of course, convicted.Bungle wrote:Having a nosey around the various Facebook accounts last night for the main 'supporters' it would appear that many may have spent the day 'spring cleaning' their posts to remove any incriminating posts.Skeleton wrote:
The link has been correctly deleted because there is some doubt as to whether it is in fact Ceylons daughter. Having seen the page i concur, she comes across as intelligent for a start.
Having Ceylon as a father would naturally ensure that the offspring follow in the FMoTL tradition and this is confirmed when reading his son's Facebook page and looking at the groups that he is a member of. His name is Kirk M Haining.
First I had heard of him was today, thanks for the info. I like the "He was, of course, convicted" line. They always areNormal Wisdom wrote:Oh yes, "commonly known as" Kirk is deeply immersed in the FMoTL woo. In fact, he used the argument that statute law didn't apply to him back in 2011 when attempting to defend a charge of growing 43 cannabis plants. He was, of course, convicted.Bungle wrote:Having a nosey around the various Facebook accounts last night for the main 'supporters' it would appear that many may have spent the day 'spring cleaning' their posts to remove any incriminating posts.Skeleton wrote:
The link has been correctly deleted because there is some doubt as to whether it is in fact Ceylons daughter. Having seen the page i concur, she comes across as intelligent for a start.
Having Ceylon as a father would naturally ensure that the offspring follow in the FMoTL tradition and this is confirmed when reading his son's Facebook page and looking at the groups that he is a member of. His name is Kirk M Haining.
http://www.nottinghampost.com/Cannabis- ... story.html
Any you will of course have seen on the bottom line of the news article that the lad wishes to be known as Kirk of the Family Haining. Are to assume that Pa Haining will instruct the court this morning that he wishes to be know as Mark of the Family Haining. We are all waiting in suspense.Normal Wisdom wrote:Oh yes, "commonly known as" Kirk is deeply immersed in the FMoTL woo. In fact, he used the argument that statute law didn't apply to him back in 2011 when attempting to defend a charge of growing 43 cannabis plants. He was, of course, convicted.Bungle wrote:Having a nosey around the various Facebook accounts last night for the main 'supporters' it would appear that many may have spent the day 'spring cleaning' their posts to remove any incriminating posts.Skeleton wrote:
The link has been correctly deleted because there is some doubt as to whether it is in fact Ceylons daughter. Having seen the page i concur, she comes across as intelligent for a start.
Having Ceylon as a father would naturally ensure that the offspring follow in the FMoTL tradition and this is confirmed when reading his son's Facebook page and looking at the groups that he is a member of. His name is Kirk M Haining.
http://www.nottinghampost.com/Cannabis- ... story.html