A lamb at LH asks to be slaughtered - & wants to pay for

[Famspear]

Peter E. ("Blowhard") Hendrickson wrote:

. . . . Those advocating errors must stop doing so, and must turn to advocating the truth. There is no room for compromise on that point, for compromise on that point is both impossible to justify and would by flatly counter-productive.

Rather than encourage anyone to "get along" or "work together" with those advocating error [ . . . ] why not simply insist that those in error face the fact that the exclusively complete and accurate truth is found in CtC, as is endlessly demonstrated with a constantly-growing mountain of evidence;?

Peter, you're breaking up. Peter. Earth calling Peter. Earth calling Peter. Come in Peter.

I think we lost him.

[Famspear]

[sounds of changing channels on a radio, and then . . .]

. . . . so, expect some scattered showers over the next few days.

Turning to the news at this hour, NASA scientists at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California are puzzled and perplexed over the recent disappearance of the space probe carrying Peter Eric (“Blowhard”) Hendrickson, the narcissistic ex-con tax protester who was being used in a NASA space project as a condition of his probation, in an advanced test of the effects of weightlessness on the promulgation of bulls**t. Hendrickson had been identified by scientists as one of the world’s leading producers of a particularly pure variety of bulls**t, and had been thought perfect for the mission, which also involved the use of the hot air from his bulls**t to power the electrical systems of the spacecraft. Everything had been operating according to plans worked out by NASA scientists until Hendrickson’s craft suddenly careened away from its pre-set orbit and sped away from the earth at an apparent speed of 0.98 of the speed of light, as Hendrickson began raving ....

[sounds of channel changing]

[webhick]

... Thus, there is a simple reality

Which is completely unrelated to CtC, since (from what I've read), the CtC seems contradict itself more often than the traditional interpretations of tax laws do.

Those advocating errors must stop doing so

Translation: You're all wrong. Shut up or be jettisoned.

and must turn to advocating the truth.

Translation: Buy my book and push my product.

There is no room for compromise on that point

Translation: Only my opinions count.

for compromise on that point is both impossible to justify

Dude, they just justified it! Banding together! That's actually a really good justification!

and would by flatly counter-productive.

Translation: My ass is so far up the river right now that it's counter-productive to even attempt to paddle. And if it's counter-productive to help me, then it should be for everyone else.

Rather than encourage anyone to "get along" or "work together" with those advocating error (and whose record of positive accomplishments-- that is, none-- accurately reflects the virtue of their positions), why not simply insist that those in error face the fact that the exclusively complete and accurate truth is found in CtC

Translation: Rather than advocate peace, declare WAR on the other TP factions for we can only survive if we wipe them off the face of the Earth!

as is endlessly demonstrated with a constantly-growing mountain of evidence? (See <redacted>/thedenierspage.htm for more on this.)

First of all, I love how he created such a run on sentence that the question mark at the end of evidence almost looks like he's not sure about his "growing mountain of evidence". Secondly, demonstrating your "growing mountain of evidence" in public to complete strangers can get you arrested. Thirdly, he conveniently forgets how his mountain of evidence is being eroded by fines, penalties, and attempted collection of the erroneous refunds by the IRS.

[The Operative]

Why should he let facts get in the way of the "truth"?