Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2

[longdog]

It is turning out just like the warrant (amanda and her promises to show it), they give the big build up and nothing happens

As my ex was prone to saying about dull films... "All of a sudden nothing happens all of the time".

[vampireLOREN]

LMAO

Has it been said who he is yet ?

It is turning out just like the warrant (amanda and her promises to show it), they give the big build up and nothing happens

As we have seen from the onesie vid - she is quite a teaser.
Likes to leave her audience wanting more.

I hate to do it, but cut them some slack.....some of them didn't know Hardcopy ....now the penny has dropped and they will have to revert to the usual Woo method of acting like it never happened.

[Pox]

LMAO

Has it been said who he is yet ?

It is turning out just like the warrant (amanda and her promises to show it), they give the big build up and nothing happens

As we have seen from the onesie vid - she is quite a teaser.
Likes to leave her audience wanting more.

I hate to do it, but cut them some slack.....some of them didn't know Hardcopy ....now the penny has dropped and they will have to revert to the usual Woo method of acting like it never happened.

The penny hasn't dropped with me - am sure it will do one day

[YiamCross]

Since Tom Crawford is of no fixed abode and appears to have no email address I am forced to serve notice of proceedings against him via Facebook. This is the link since the Crawfords spend a lot of time looking at this page and my Facebook group I expect they'll get to it pretty quickly one way or the other. Let's face it, they saw my post about lunch in the Elwes Arms and arrived there within about half an hour so I'm confident they've already seen the bundle.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/9107682 ... up_comment

If I could work out how to post a pdf file here I would post the whole bundle but I can't so sorry to anyone who doesn't have access to Facebook.

Anyone who can tell me if there's a way and if so how, I'd be grateful.

[Bones]

Yiam, I may be wrong but if I was you, I would think further about your reliance on the Human Rights Act





May I be as bold, to recommend that you read this and consider what you have said above

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... /39/39.pdf

[PeanutGallery]

I would concur with Bones' analysis, however I would say that you have enough in their, in my lay opinion, to get an injunction against these individuals. In regard to serving notice against Tom, I believe the CPR gives you the option to send the evidence to his last known address (you might need a judges permission to do this), I don't think it allows you to serve via Facebook or via the Internet - even if that is the only way to contact the defendant, because quite simply, it's not that up to date.

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/proce ... part06#6.9

So you need to send a copy to Tom's last known address, which would be 3 Fearn Chase, Carlton, Nottingham. I'm sure it wouldn't be too much trouble for him to pop along and pick it up.

You may also want to consider making a complaint to the ICO about Facebook, Google and GOODF allowing your address to be published, that is private and personal information and under the Data Protection Act they shouldn't release it without your consent. Specifically 10(1) of the DPA. That should encourage them to remove the posting and video.

Good luck. It's not nice to be put through what they are putting you through, but again these people generally don't think of consequences.

[fat frank]

if he is of no fixed abode, send care of his daughter house

[NigelJK]

While I appreciate the namecheck,

Apologies to both, I blame the mind numbing stupidity of these dolts.

[longdog]

There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

I fail to see how any of the respondents fall into the category of 'a public authority'.

the eviction incident cost the public purse £500,000.00 minimum.

Says who? What is the relevance of this even if it is true?


To be brutally honest I think the whole action is ill advised and ill conceived and could end up costing you a lot of money for nothing which would be rather ionic given the background.

[Burnaby49]

I would concur with Bones' analysis, however I would say that you have enough in their, in my lay opinion, to get an injunction against these individuals. In regard to serving notice against Tom, I believe the CPR gives you the option to send the evidence to his last known address (you might need a judges permission to do this), I don't think it allows you to serve via Facebook or via the Internet - even if that is the only way to contact the defendant, because quite simply, it's not that up to date.

I have some experience in this, not firsthand! I've attended court hearings where someone wanted to serve documents against the other party but couldn't because they couldn't find their address. One was a wife who wanted to serve divorce papers against her husband but couldn't find out where he currently lived. However she heard he still regularly attended a specific mosque. So she had the court agree that sticking the papers on the mosque bulletin board served as legal notice. Another couldn't get into the security-guarded building where the guy lived and the defendant kept scooting in and out of a locked garage. So the court authorized alterate service by delivering to the doorman. Point is that if you want to serve documents indirectly you probably need a court order.

viewtopic.php?f=48&t=9377&start=220#p163974

[SoLongCeylon]

To be brutally honest I think the whole action is ill advised and ill conceived and could end up costing you a lot of money for nothing which would be rather ionic given the background.

Unless Yiam or his family has suffered from physical threats / visits to his home ( which I do hope hasn't happened ) then isn't this showing to the Crawfords etc that they succeeded in " getting " at him? I think I would have just let it all calm down.

However, I support Yiam in his quest to expose the poisonous group comprised of TC, MH, GT, Ebert, Bonkers Bernicia, Dreary O'Deirra etc as he has at least come out from behind the keyboard.

[ArthurWankspittle]

So you need to send a copy to Tom's last known address, which would be 3 Fearn Chase, Carlton, Nottingham. I'm sure it wouldn't be too much trouble for him to pop along and pick it up.

He will have taken the precaution of getting the Post Office to redirect his mail to his new address.
Actually this raises an interesting point. Send it to 3 Fearn Chase as Tom no doubt still claims that's his address.

[littleFred]

According to Wiki:

In December 2008, the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory ruled that Facebook is a valid protocol to serve court notices to defendants. It is believed to be the world's first legal judgement that defines a summons posted on Facebook as legally binding.

[AndyPandy]

So you need to send a copy to Tom's last known address, which would be 3 Fearn Chase, Carlton, Nottingham. I'm sure it wouldn't be too much trouble for him to pop along and pick it up.

He will have taken the precaution of getting the Post Office to redirect his mail to his new address.
Actually this raises an interesting point. Send it to 3 Fearn Chase as Tom no doubt still claims that's his address.

He's started a thread on Goofy, post it there

http://getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/viewt ... kHPBHrfWK0

[getoutofdebtfools]

Whilst I appreciate Yiam's plight, personally, I'm not sure making everything public is the best way forward.

Yiam does not profess to be a lawyer and that is pretty clear in the make-up of his bundle, good though it is for a layman, like me.

The service of legal proceedings via Facebook has had mixed reviews in Court. Whilst not a direct comparison this recent article http://www.nucleus.org.uk/service-of-le ... an-option/ suggests it is not a viable option.

Further, this article goes on to explain the difficulties in issuing againt Facebook themselves - http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2015/11/09 ... sy-matter/

I wish Yiam well as it is unfortunate that he was recognised by the moron-brigade, But he did stick his head above the parapet and this was always going to happen. You can't expect people of such stupidity to react sensibly.

Another twist in the Crawford matter to make it worth watching...

[Tml69]

You have service issues here. Arguably you have less obligation to serve correctly for without notice / emergency injunctions but really you should be making a n244 application to dispense with service or allow alternate service. Other option might be to effect personal service with a process server.

[mac]

Why is Yiam using Taylors mugshot on his FB

[fat frank]

Why is Yiam using Taylors mugshot on his FB

to annoy them

[YiamCross]

Why is Yiam using Taylors mugshot on his FB

to annoy them

Not completely. It's because someone on EFOTB decided that's who Yiam Cross was. I couldn't resist rubbing in the stupidity.

[mac]