Well, there is. Researchers at the Department of Psychology at Cornell published this paper in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 1999 - long after folks like Schiff's acolytes had provided plenty of evidence to those of us who waste time following them.
While the promotors add the element (always helpful) of the con, this article fits the mass of posters to the various boards discussed here to a "T". Read the authors' predictions:
Sound like anybody we know?Prediction 1. Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria.
Prediction 2. Incompetent individuals will suffer from deficient metacognitive skills, in that they will be less able than their more competent peers to recognize competence when they see it–be it their own or anyone else's.
Prediction 3. Incompetent individuals will be less able than their more competent peers to gain insight into their true level of performance by means of social comparison information. In particular, because of their difficulty recognizing competence in others, incompetent individuals will be unable to use information about the choices and performances of others to form more accurate impressions of their own ability.
Prediction 4. The incompetent can gain insight about their shortcomings, but this comes (paradoxically) by making them more competent, thus providing them the metacognitive skills necessary to be able to realize that they have performed poorly.
