There's a site called www.rantrave.com, on which you can find some very interesting posts. Some are good; some are bad; and some, like this post from a frequent poster, are outright deranged:
http://www.rantrave.com/Rant/LIST-OF-FA ... COURT.aspx
I wonder what this clown's track record is....
An interesting source for sovrun idiocy
Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
An interesting source for sovrun idiocy
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Princeps Wooloosia
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 pm
Re: An interesting source for sovrun idiocy
From the document on Rant/Rave that you linked:
It also has a serious problem with its citations. For example:
Hoffsommer v. Hayes (1923) 92 Okla 32, 217 P 477.
The rest of the document is about as accurate.
28 US Code § 1330 actually deals with actions against "foreign states" - meaning other countries and their subdivisions, agencies and the like (in particular, it does NOT mean another state of the United States). The section gives federal district courts jurisdiction over cases between a US party and a foreign country, unless international agreements or the like provide otherwise.That Title 28 USC 1330 states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for the suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the united states citizen is actually a corporate entity and not a living man upon the land.
It also has a serious problem with its citations. For example:
It turns out that the correct citation (some of you may have realized that an Oklahoma state court decision would not be reprinted in the Federal reporter) is:"The courts are not bound by an officer's interpretation of the law under which he presumes to act." Hoffsomer v. Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227 F 417.
Hoffsommer v. Hayes (1923) 92 Okla 32, 217 P 477.
The rest of the document is about as accurate.
-
- Fourth Shogun of Quatloosia
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:04 pm
- Location: Here, I used to be there, but I moved.
Re: An interesting source for sovrun idiocy
What! A sovrun with a reading comprehension problem? Who would have guessed?fortinbras wrote:From the document on Rant/Rave that you linked:
28 US Code § 1330 actually deals with actions against "foreign states" - meaning other countries and their subdivisions, agencies and the like (in particular, it does NOT mean another state of the United States).That Title 28 USC 1330 states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for the suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the united states citizen is actually a corporate entity and not a living man upon the land.
Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak.
-
- Princeps Wooloosia
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 pm