He's currently involved in a collections due process case in Tax Court -- 21322-07L.
For those not familiar with TC docket numbers, the '-07' means that the original petition was filed in 2007. So, this case has been kicking around for just under three years.
If anyone is truly interested in what's going on, they'll have to visit the Tax Court in Washington to look at the documents. However, an excerpt from one of the documents available via the Court's docket inquiry service reveals absolutely nothing surprising:
Irwin continues to beat the same dead horse, oblivious to the fact that there is absolutely no chance that the decomposing corpse will reanimate and carry him to victory.On March 22, 2010, petitioner submitted a document entitled "MOTION TO IMPOSE RULE 11 SANCTIONS ON RESPONDENT AND TO STRIKE `FALSE AND FRAUDULENT' CLAIMS FROM ITS RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT" .
The Court had that document filed as petitioner's motion to deem stricken "false and
fraudulent" claims of respondent in respondent's response to petitioner's cross-motion for summary judgment (petitioner's motion) .
The Court notes that Rule 11, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, does not provide for the imposition of sanctions .
In petitioner's motion, petitioner continues to make certain statements, contentions, and/or arguments that the Court finds to be frivolous and/or groundless .
