Michael of Bernicia, apparently.littleFred wrote: A bloke with long hair and megaphone, northern accent, says the noise from the crowd is impeding Tom's chances of winning his appeal, so he asks the crowd to be peaceful.
viewtopic.php?f=47&t=10334
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Michael of Bernicia, apparently.littleFred wrote: A bloke with long hair and megaphone, northern accent, says the noise from the crowd is impeding Tom's chances of winning his appeal, so he asks the crowd to be peaceful.
If the report is accurate. a "victory" today would merely give him permission to appeal. To grant this, the judge would have to be convinced that Tom's case wasn't totally hopeless. Tom would then face the harder task of actually winning an appeal.Nottingham Post wrote:Mr Crawford, who has been embroiled in an ongoing battle with Bradford and Bingley bank over his mortgage, appeared at Nottingham County Court to seek permission to appeal against a possession order issued against his Carlton home.
Oh right - I missed that.littleFred wrote:If the report is accurate. a "victory" today would merely give him permission to appeal. To grant this, the judge would have to be convinced that Tom's case wasn't totally hopeless. Tom would then face the harder task of actually winning an appeal.Nottingham Post wrote:Mr Crawford, who has been embroiled in an ongoing battle with Bradford and Bingley bank over his mortgage, appeared at Nottingham County Court to seek permission to appeal against a possession order issued against his Carlton home.
http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... UOWBXB4WrUDifficult to see just what was going on at the court after 15.00, but judging from the number of police present, it seems that the judgement was already known prior to the hearing? Unless I haven't comprehended what was happening?![]()
I can sort of understand the mob approach at a Council Tax hearing or even a possession hearing in that it may delay the inevitable but at a case which has been instigated by the footler, who presumably wants the court do do something for him, then it seems massively counter-productive.rumpelstilzchen wrote:One thing I have never been able to understand is why the UK freeple believe that a huge mob of supporters attending one of their court appearances will have some effect on the decision. The case will be decided on merit.
Somebody really needs to explain to them that if the law is x then x will be applied. A room full of supporters will not turn x into yPeanutGallery wrote:I think it's quite obvious, they want to bully the Judge into giving them the verdict they want, rather than risk the Judge giving them the one they deserve.
That second video, imo, shows that they are not really interested in a decision based on what the position of the law is but are more interested in a decision reached by mob rule.longdog wrote: I can sort of understand the mob approach at a Council Tax hearing or even a possession hearing in that it may delay the inevitable but at a case which has been instigated by the footler, who presumably wants the court do do something for him, then it seems massively counter-productive.
Yes, there is that.PeanutGallery wrote:I'm not entirely sure these are the type of people who readily understand complicated concepts like explanations.
Judge unlikey to reach decision today, Bradford and Bingley offering to come to an agreement.rumpelstilzchen wrote:Yes, there is that.PeanutGallery wrote:I'm not entirely sure these are the type of people who readily understand complicated concepts like explanations.
The crowd are already calling it a victory.vampireLOREN wrote:Judge unlikey to reach decision today, Bradford and Bingley offering to come to an agreement.rumpelstilzchen wrote:Yes, there is that.PeanutGallery wrote:I'm not entirely sure these are the type of people who readily understand complicated concepts like explanations.
Re: Latest NEWS day of Common Law action 1st May 5.03 pm
Postby bertiebert » Fri May 01, 2015 5:14 pm
Roger Hayes just came out of the "court" said looks like Some doors have been opened looks like Bradford and Bingley dont want to evict him..
Roger suggested it was because of the people supporting have made the difference..
I would assume restart the mortgage?, if he has any sense its a good offer. But .....lets see, it I expect will be adjourned for "discussion".rumpelstilzchen wrote:Well, there you go, I've just been proven wrong:Re: Latest NEWS day of Common Law action 1st May 5.03 pm
Postby bertiebert » Fri May 01, 2015 5:14 pm
Roger Hayes just came out of the "court" said looks like Some doors have been opened looks like Bradford and Bingley dont want to evict him..
Roger suggested it was because of the people supporting have made the difference..
vampireLOREN wrote:The crowd are already calling it a victory.vampireLOREN wrote: Judge unlikey to reach decision today, Bradford and Bingley offering to come to an agreement.
I did mention some days ago that Crawford couldn't introduce the Guy Taylor goofer crap as any kind of evidence or defence as, according to Crawford, the fraudulent court documents and stamps were the topic of an "ongoing special Police investigation" . I simply do not beileve this would have been allowed because as the Police often say; ' We cannot comment, as that is part of an ongoing investigation and we do not want to jeopardize the investigation'Normal Wisdom wrote:Interesting that Tom appears to be basing his appeal, at least in part, on the specific facts of his case, i.e. the endowment policy, change of terms etc and not only (or at all) on the "all mortgages are fraud", "documents are fake" nonsense that GOODF support.