TheRambler
[/quote]
You mean crayon?
[/quote]
Crayons are for snacking, with this crowd.



Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
The guy called Too Tall on there dishes out some staggeringly bad advice, but presents it in a way that the freeloaders lap up as legal advice.TheRambler wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 5:09 pm
Now Owl, were some mischievous individual to post that information on the Contract\Trust\Privacy Law Knowledge Share Facebook page
Trouble is that you need to lick crayons to produce a “wet ink” signature. Maybe that’s where they go wrong.JamesVincent wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 2:04 amYou mean crayon?TheRambler wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 5:09 pm ..the defendant obviously didn’t use the correct colour pens or a Trancash giro.
TheRambler
He's not the only one, the group is a classic echo chamber with a recognisable grift element. You've seen the video, now buy my book. Whilst poor process undeniably exists and the culprits should be held to account, that people believe there is an easy way to write off debt and are taken in by the wilder claims of "Success!!!!" is sad. However I suppose that might be how some of them got in a pickle in the first place.TheRambler wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 1:53 pmhucknallred wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 6:55 amThe guy called Too Tall on there dishes out some staggeringly bad advice, but presents it in a way that the freeloaders lap up as legal advice.TheRambler wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 5:09 pm
Now Owl, were some mischievous individual to post that information on the Contract\Trust\Privacy Law Knowledge Share Facebook page
Not many come back to say it worked.
I've seen no grift as such in the Contract law group. Just the advice by Too Tall.TheRambler wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 1:54 pm
He's not the only one, the group is a classic echo chamber with a recognisable grift element. You've seen the video, now buy my book. Whilst poor process undeniably exists and the culprits should be held to account, that people believe there is an easy way to write off debt and are taken in by the wilder claims of "Success!!!!" is sad. However I suppose that might be how some of them got in a pickle in the first place.
The bailiffs finally seized Ryan's castle, it's being sold by auction right now - https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/151963205#/AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 10:08 am As it's been quiet, I thought I'd see if there had been any recent cases.
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk ... /2024/1866
TL;DR He tried paying off company loans using promissory notes and ended up with a Civil Restraint Order and £55,254 in costs.
I note that the listing states that:The bailiffs finally seized Ryan's castle,
It is believed that the farmhouse is currently occupied by unconfirmed occupants.
No Viewings Available
Which rather implies that either the bailiffs didn't seize it, or it was reoccupied. Either way, the guide price seems optimistic.Any warranties concerning vacant possession are expressly excluded by the Seller. The Property is being sold subject to any lease, licence or other occupation which may exist as at the date of Completion without obligation on the part of the Seller to define or identify the same. Any potential bidders must rely on their own due diligence.
AST?... a valuation report dated June 2022 stated that the cottage was let on an AST for £7,800pa
Presumably Assured Shorthold Tenancy.JamesVincent wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2024 2:38 am That's a nice looking pad. I'm not on that side of the pond but that price seems low?
AST?... a valuation report dated June 2022 stated that the cottage was let on an AST for £7,800pa
This is how many of the grifters, like O'Bonkers, operate. They take what, on the face of things, appears to be a genuine grievance (or at least one worth testing in court) and then twist it into something that it isn't.