Lawyers are like nuclear weapons. They have theirs, I have mine. When you use them, they f*** everything up.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Grixit wrote:Hey Diller: forget terms like "wages", "income", "derived from", "received", etc. If you did something, and got paid for it, you owe tax.
It didn't occur to me until now (and correct me if I'm wrong), but the reason the motion for summary judgment was denied the very same day it was entered was the fact it came AFTER trial had been completed. Motions for summary judgment are correctly made BEFORE trial.wserra wrote:The continuation page for docket entry 14 (Mooney's summary judgment motion), under "Action/Status Date", says "DN 03/15/2010". I've never had a Tax Court case, but according to the abbreviations list "DN" means "denied".LPC wrote:Where do you get "Denied" from?
The "NW" after "Mooney" means "nitwit".
Yeah, that's a great way to prove you don't have to pay taxes. If just one out of one hundred deniers manages to win through a technicality, then that will prove that you will not go to jail by following this method. Ignore those other ninety nine deniers that did wind up in jail.One definite way to garner a serious response from the IRS is to take them to Court (any court will do). This is the path that all warriors presently tackling the beast are encouraged to consider. Force them to bare their corrupt game on the table. There are lots of corrupt courts and judges, to be sure...but not all of them. It is a minefield they are fearful of walking.
Well, since a bunch of the crackheads have gone already, and none of them have won, if your 1% theory holds then the odds are looking better that someone will someday!Brandybuck wrote:Yeah, that's a great way to prove you don't have to pay taxes. If just one out of one hundred deniers manages to win through a technicality, then that will prove that you will not go to jail by following this method. Ignore those other ninety nine deniers that did wind up in jail.One definite way to garner a serious response from the IRS is to take them to Court (any court will do). This is the path that all warriors presently tackling the beast are encouraged to consider. Force them to bare their corrupt game on the table. There are lots of corrupt courts and judges, to be sure...but not all of them. It is a minefield they are fearful of walking.
Even assuming that this statement is correct, and that a verdict against PMM does not mean that CtC is "wrong," it still means that CtC is useless, because it never produces any favorable result in any court.PMM, the Delusional Moron wrote:A verdict against me in this instance would not mean that CTC is wrong, but the the Court acted outside the law (again) in my case.
And if I flap my arms and fly, it serious weakens the credibility of the laws of aerodynamics.PMM, the Delusional Moron wrote:A verdict in my favor returns my property and seriously weakens the credibility of the DOJ and the IRS, as well as continues to implicate the Federal Government in one of the greatest criminal financial/political operations in modern history.
You *have* lost. Hendrickson lost. Every other person filing a "CtC educated return" has lost.PMM, the Delusional Moron wrote:I can't lose,
It doesn't matter one way or the other, but that's not exactly right. According to the docket (I see Tax Court has another site that uses temporary URLs, so there is no point in a link), Mooney filed his SJ motion of 3/2/10, and it was denied on 3/15/10. "C/S" means "Certificate of Service".ASITStands wrote:It didn't occur to me until now (and correct me if I'm wrong), but the reason the motion for summary judgment was denied the very same day it was entered was the fact it came AFTER trial had been completed. Motions for summary judgment are correctly made BEFORE trial.
Is a six-month delay in a TC verdict par for the course or not? I have no idea. And the govt's motion was an oral one at the close of the trial, essentially arguing that they were entitled to judgment on the law (i.e. there was no issue of fact). That seems right for your typical crackhead position. But a judge in a bench trial would typically reserve decision on such a motion until the verdict, not rule beforehand.And, yes, it appears Respondent's motion for directed verdict is STILL open.... It seems odd that the decision has not been made
Supplement: Amount of tax at issue in 8128-09 -- $525.51Nikki wrote:Patrick Michael Mooney; USTC Docket 021647-063) I walked into Tax Court nearly six months ago and have left them speechless thus far.
- ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION ENTERED, Judge Chiechi. Resp.
- U.S.C.A. 4 Cir. Mandate 04/07/09. Decision Affirmed
Patrick Michael Mooney; USTC Docket 008128-09
- MOTION by petr. for summary judgment 3/15/10
- Denied 3/15/10
PMM seems to be dwelling somewhere near planet Merrill.
I'm not surprised that he's an "owl". Everything he says is definitely a hoot.Joey Smith wrote:The bottom line is that Patrick Mooney -- one of the "Owls" on the LostHeads website -- not only lost, but lost badly, and is simply too stupid to understand that.
http://www.losthorizons.com/phpBB/viewt ... 5920#25920....Once they [Internal Revenue Service personnel] act in violation of the laws that constrain them, they have, in fact and in essence, lost all of their statutory authority.
How would you fight a corporation that was trying to rob you by claiming charges on an account you never opened or were even aware of?
I've sent the junk email letter above, the computer notices still keep coming. I didn't expect it to be effective, only to save myself the time and anguish of preparing considerate and proper responses, only to have them ignored completely.
In what is still for me GREAT NEWS, and a further confirmation of power and truth of CTC, it has now been over 6 months since my second tax court trial and the IRS remains in stunned silence on the matter.
I am now preparing intensely to take my case to the public at large. There will be lots of video information I'll be putting together over the course of the next few months that will simplify the issue for newbies and be an inspiring resource for veteran warriors.
I have no doubt in my mind that we are on the side of the RIGHT here. America is fed up to the hilt with the Feds (and the draconian health care laws have not even been put into effect yet). you can be sure this tension and anger will only increase in the future, and the people will be incensed enough to rise up for themselves.
It's an exciting time to be an American. We are going to be the generation that is responsible for what later historians will call the American Restoration.
CTC ["Cracking the Code," the Peter Hendrickson tax scam] is the most precise and cutting weapon in this epic battle thus far. I urge you to continue spreading the word of it by ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
Now is not the time to be bashful or afraid of what others will think of you. Take a stand and be a leader in your community.
I would still like to call for and plan a national gathering of leaders from all 50 states to better coordinate our efforts. If your state doesn't have a forum, start one!
If IRS attorneys laugh at Mooney and he doesn't hear them, is his legal theory still unsound?... it has now been over 6 months since my second tax court trial and the IRS remains in stunned silence on the matter.
And The Moon is made of green cheese.lorne wrote:It's becoming more certain that Mooney and the tax honesty adherents will have the last laugh.