File a False Lien - Go To Jail (Ronald Hoodenpyle)

[grixit]

Oh my gosh-- all this time-- he really is from an alternate universe! And now he's trying to usurp the place of this world's David Merrill! If he is ever successful with one of his filings, we're all doomed! The chaos and illogic he brings with him will loosen the bonds of quantum interaction and eveything will dissolve into quarks and photons!

[Gregg]

The video is actually worth watching, if only for the laughing towards the end.

From what I can make of it, it's not just wrong, it's almost more accurate to say its anti-right. The claim is not on the buildings at all, it's on the land. It's not a federal issue, in the states it's a state issue.

Money quote "go home and shoot your mailbox" gets my nomination for the "Stupid Sov'run Suggestion of the month"

[Judge Roy Bean]

Does anyone realize the number of synaptic operations that would be wasted in reviewing that meaningless drivel?

[JamesVincent]

Does anyone realize the number of synaptic operations that would be wasted in reviewing that meaningless drivel?

Too many to the 10th power?

[Judge Roy Bean]

The gibberish is probably capable of destroying more brain cells than excessive amounts of even really good tequila.

[Gregg]

The gibberish is probably capable of destroying more brain cells than excessive amounts of even really good tequila.

We should test that, or send it to Mythbusters!

[David Merrill]

Take a close look and tell me how fair you think this is. You have to pay careful attention to the date on the summons, and the date on the service of the summons. – And especially the date approved on the summons by the clerk of court!



Some of you simply lack the attention span to get this so I am going slow. The foreclosure hearing was scheduled for the 22nd but look at the date on this secret foreclosure hearing!



Poor Ronald Roy! He demanded a that Deutshe Bank bring the original note to the foreclosure hearing and when he got to the hearing the clerk of court informed him that he must not really care much about his home because he missed the very important foreclosure hearing held in secret on the 16th, the same day by the way, that Deutsche Bank was served with the subpoena duces tecum!!

Poor Ronald Roy! You might wonder what would drive a man to negative averment and maritime liens – and putting liens on IRS agents and such!

Just so nobody accuses me of hiding links, here is some related information to indicate how Duetsche Bank is. You might especially get a look at the witness list! Of course that will bring out the best of denial around here.

To better comprehend though, you should look at that Doc 70; I mean the real one from PACER of course (you got that Wesley?).

http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/8563 ... roughc.jpg

To understand get a look at the traditional Foreclosure Notice, Paragraph 2.


Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. Moderator; Editing the posts is very difficult for me. Please delete the four posts above this. I noticed that I had made another error. Please restore my ability to edit posts.

I tried to present is slowly for the slower and uniniterested. What people don't seem to get is that they held his foreclosure hearing early, in secret!

Thanks for making my point guys!


Take a close look and tell me how fair you think this is.

[Imalawman]

Seems fair to me.

[Arthur Rubin]

And to me. Could you explain what that second document is, again. The "signature" scrawled on it certainly has no legal meaning, and I have doubts as to how MARITIME OR ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION got into a state court docket.

[wserra]

I have doubts as to how MARITIME OR ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION got into a state court docket.

Especially a Colorado state court docket. Is Hoodie selling oceanfront property there?

[Imalawman]

I have doubts as to how MARITIME OR ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION got into a state court docket.

Especially a Colorado state court docket. Is Hoodie selling oceanfront property there?

Yeah, I laughed when I saw that too. How dumb does he think we are?

[Pottapaug1938]

How dumb does he think we are?

He thinks that we are the dumbest collection of sheeple on the Internet, and maybe everywhere else. After all, we don't recognize what is GLARINGLY obvious to his brilliant mind....

[Pottapaug1938]

Only a partial case number can be seen on both the screen print and the photographed page, making it impossible to know whether they even relate to the same case.

C'mon, now -- do you really think that Van Pelt would actually post something of genuine probative value?

[webhick]

Only a partial case number can be seen on both the screen print and the photographed page, making it impossible to know whether they even relate to the same case.

The subpoena actually does have a case number on it (2007 CV 5527), but the forum cuts it off because the image is too wide.

[triumphguy2]

In lieu of doing things that would result in actual fees earned, I have spent some time researching the saga of the Hoodenpyle Peccadilloes. Much as it pains me to admit it, there is something at least superficially questionable about the timeline for this foreclosure.
The motion for an order authorizing the sale was filed 11/5/07. The Notice of Sale was published 11/21/07. The sale was first noticed for 1/2/08, then continued to 1/16/08. None of this was 'secret'.
In the meantime, the Rule 120 hearing was scheduled, then continued to 11/27/07 then was vacated. Rule 120 on its face allows the debtor to raise only the defenses of no debt owed (i.e., there has been no default), or Soldiers & Sailors Civil Relief Act. However, in practice, the courts also allow the debtor to challenge the creditor based on real party in interest or any other substantive defense to foreclosure. That hearing was reset for 1/22/08.
In the meantime, the property was sold on 1/16/08, as previously scheduled.
RonRoy evidently wanted his subpoena to compel the bank to 'produce the note' at the time of the rescheduled Rule 120 hearing on 1/22/08 so he could show DB was not the real party in interest; by then, the property had already been sold, not by a 'secret hearing' as DMVP claims, but by the properly noticed trustee's sale. It seems to me the sale should not take place until after the Rule 120 hearing is resolved; however, the rule also requires the debtor to file a verified response five days before the hearing; if that is not done, the court can dispense with the hearing and authorize the sale. So if RonRoy didn't file his papers in time, but instead just planned on showing up on the 22nd, the court may have already approved the sale based on his failure to file five days before the hearing. Evidently RonRoy tried to appeal (the docket shows an entry for 'Mandate from Appeals Court') but orders on Rule 120 motions are not appealable. So while I certainly wonder how and why it came to pass that the Rule 120 hearing was not scheduled until after the sale, neither the sale nor the hearing were 'secret' and it was probably RonRoy's responsibility to seek an order staying the sale if he had a substantial defense to the foreclosure.
As is so often the case with DMVP, there's less to this than meets the eye.

[LPC]

I have spent some time researching the saga of the Hoodenpyle Peccadilloes.

Worst name for a Country & Western band ever.

[grixit]

And to me. Could you explain what that second document is, again. The "signature" scrawled on it certainly has no legal meaning, and I have doubts as to how MARITIME OR ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION got into a state court docket.

Uh, because the party doing the filing is all wet?

[grixit]

I have spent some time researching the saga of the Hoodenpyle Peccadilloes.

Worst name for a Country & Western band ever.

Weren't they the house band for a c-list porn studio?

[wserra]

TG2 - would you please post the docket? I don't have access to Colorado state court records.

[triumphguy2]

Soitenly!
(Although it's not very illuminating).
My information was synthesized from the state court records, the public trustee's records (http://elpasopublictrustee.com/SearchDe ... C200703320), and Westlaw.

Case Number: 2007CV5527(District) Date Filed: 2007-11-06

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Vs. Hoodenpyle, Darla
Rule 120 Deeds of Trst Pub Trs Summary

Judge: G David Miller
Court: El Paso County
Division: O
Appealed:
Case Closed Date: 12/06/2007

Case Status

Closed;

Judge or Magistrate
Name BAR Number
G David Miller 17251

Participants Litigant Attorney
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Shore, David A
Petitioner 1 Role: Privately Retained Attorney
DOB: BAR: 19973
Gender: Unknown Primary Attorney: Y
Race:

Hoodenpyle, Darla

Scheduled Events
Date Time Details
Status: Held and Continued
Judge: Robert C Erler
Room: O
11/27/2007 9:00 AM Rule 120 Hearing
Status: Vacated
Judge: Robert C Erler
Room: O
01/22/2008 9:00 AM Rule 120 Hearing

Proceedings
Date Code Description
11/06/2007 NTHR Notc Of Hearing
11/06/2007 MOAS Motion For Order Auth Sale
11/06/2007 COVR Civil Case Cover Sheet
11/06/2007 CERT Certificate Filed
11/20/2007 FOTH Filing Other
11/20/2007 FOTH Filing Other
11/20/2007 FOTH Filing Other
11/26/2007 MOTN Motion
11/26/2007 FOTH Filing Other
11/26/2007 FOTH Filing Other
11/27/2007 MINC Minute Order (print)
11/30/2007 ORDR Order
11/30/2007 ORDR Order
12/05/2007 RSPN Response
12/06/2007 ORDR Order
12/06/2007 ORDR Order
12/06/2007 ORDR Order
12/06/2007 MINC Minute Order (print)
12/06/2007 CLAD Case Closed
12/20/2007 ORDR Order
01/15/2008 FOTH Filing Other
01/15/2008 FOTH Filing Other
01/15/2008 AFFI Affidavit
01/16/2008 FOTH Filing Other
01/17/2008 ORDR Order
01/22/2008 RS Return Of Service
01/22/2008 NOTC Notice Filed
01/22/2008 NOTC Notice Filed
01/22/2008 FOTH Filing Other
01/25/2008 NOTC Notice Filed
01/25/2008 MOTN Motion
01/29/2008 ORDR Order
01/29/2008 ORDR Order
01/30/2008 ORDR Order
02/14/2008 RSPN Response
02/19/2008 RSPN Response
02/27/2008 FOTH Filing Other
03/20/2008 MOTN Motion
03/20/2008 FOTH Filing Other
03/27/2008 ORDR Order
03/27/2008 ORDR Order
04/01/2008 ORDR Order
04/16/2008 MOTN Motion
04/16/2008 MOTN Motion
04/24/2008 ORDR Order
04/30/2008 MOTN Motion
05/06/2008 FOTH Filing Other
05/13/2008 ORDR Order
05/21/2008 ORDR Order
05/21/2008 NOTC Notice Filed
05/22/2008 FOTH Filing Other
05/27/2008 ORDR Order
05/29/2008 REPL Reply
06/18/2008 FOTH Filing Other
06/26/2008 NOTC Notice Filed
08/04/2008 MAND Mandate From Appeals Court
10/30/2008 ORDR Order

The docket report does not allow you to see copies of the actual documents; evidently they are only available by mail. The date of the first Rule 120 hearing for some reason does not display but it is the one noted 'Held and continued.' I was not able to find a website that would produce a screen cap like the one posted by DMVP.