Here is the result of some of the editing that makes this so difficult to read and understand, apart from the legal nonsense:
Secretary attempted to create a nationwide system, but there is no authority for Congress to create something called “Nationwide Jurisdiction.” The 16th Amendment forbids “Nationwide Jurisdiction.” (Among the Several States.).
Setting aside notion none of three IRS employees were acting in their capacity as
delegate of Secretary, due to criminal referral, Court should have followed laws Congress
wrote, or did not write, instead of making laws as facts were disclosed.
With no IRS with jurisdiction and no IRD or DD, gift, return, service not defined, no duty
under willfulness, every transaction in Springer's name and BBM, all property in Springer's
name, Counts One through Six failed to allege offense and dismissal was required by law.
For reasons no referral made, neither IRS or any "lawful functions" existed due to no IRDs or DDs, terms return, gift, services, not defined, form 1040 not complying with PRA, Court's jurisprudence on PRA unclear, evidence obtained in violation of 7601-02, purported affidavit not sworn, capacity of Shern, Meadors and others not as delegates, evidence insufficient, no overt act or affirmative act alleged furthering any offense, No U.S. Attorney, violations of Sixth
Amendment jury trial, venue, jurisdiction, including presentation of good faith and complete
defense, instructions, counsel, Fifth Amendment due process, Judge prevented and recusal
warranted, as well as sentence of 180 months and restitution of $770,000 each clearly
erroneous, lenity, reversal of all convictions is required by law.