All Caps Nonsense

Lawprof · Post by **Lawprof** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:41 am

One of my favorite alternate universe arguments is the one that your name in ALL CAPS is not "you" but some other entity that you can disavow. One of the arguments is that nowhere else is your name given in all caps. Go visit your local cemetery: all the gravestones are in all caps. Is that because the straw men are buried there and the real corpses were stolen by the Feds (or worse yet, they were kidnapped and are toiling away as some kind of zombie labor?!)

LP

Post by **Demosthenes** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:56 am

You're going to do just fine on Quatloos, Lawprof. Welcome!

Disilloosianed · Post by **Disilloosianed** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:43 pm

Hi Prof and welcome,

I am bringing cases against a couple of those all caps people. The funny thing is that they usually file UCC financing statements with the state AG against the ALL CAPS entity, claiming themselves to be a secured creditor of the ficitious corporation our office creates....love those fictious corporations.

So what you end up with is John J. Doe as the secured creditor against JOHN J DOE, debtor, with the same address listed for both.

Imalawman · Post by **Imalawman** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:50 pm

For some reason, I'm seeing the john doe: Smith crowd more lately, although I do have a couple ALL CAPPERs. That cracks me up more. I heard one explanation of the ":" in the name in which he stated that if you took away the colon from the time on a clock it would become a fiction, thus, removing a colon from a name produces the same result - a fiction. TPs are a never ending source of amusement. Otherwise tax law would get a bit boring.

Welcome taxprof.

Disilloosianed · Post by **Disilloosianed** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:54 pm

Removing one's colon causes one to become a fiction? Lord, I thought making them lug that bag around was bad.

Post by **Prof** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:33 pm

Since you teach the UCC, you'll find the UCC arguments and tax lien arguments made by some of the folks completely confusing.

I find the analysis set out at various places concerning the common law entertaining, as well. See the arguments about Erie RR v. Thompkins.

As an ex law prof, I am truely amazed at the "logic" exhibited by these nuts. For grins, also try http://www.suijuris.net.

Welcome to the fun house.

Post by **grixit** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:03 pm

What's weird about these syntactic arguments is that, for all the claim to worship "common law", there is no historical precedent. The further back in time you go, the fewer punctuation rules you have, and the more variation of usage. So when Shakespeare famously spelt his name several different ways on the same contract, no one thought he was trying to substitute a corporation for himself, they just thought he was being a wise guy. Also, way back, before there were lower case letters, no one claimed that everyone was a corporation.

Post by **Prof** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:13 pm

CaptainKickback wrote:In the early 1800's the letters "I" and "J" were used interchangably. Which is why (if memory serves) the streets in D.C. go, H, I, K, L...... J was skipped because it was deemed to be the equivalent of I and thus would have been a repetition.

Language changes over time, not only in punctuation, but in word usage, grammar, syntax and even the preferred meaning of a word.

In Shakespeare's time, calling a girl nice would have gotten your face slapped by her. At that time "nice" meant some one with "round heels" who fell into bed very quickly. A slut.

On the plus side, we no longer use the word "murple."

Re: "nice girls"; see also ZZ TOP, that li'l ol' band from Texas, and the song, "LaGrange," which says, about the Chicken Ranch, "lots of nice girls out there."

Post by **Demosthenes** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:14 pm

grixit wrote:What's weird about these syntactic arguments is that, for all the claim to worship "common law", there is no historical precedent. The further back in time you go, the fewer punctuation rules you have, and the more variation of usage. So when Shakespeare famously spelt his name several different ways on the same contract, no one thought he was trying to substitute a corporation for himself, they just thought he was being a wise guy. Also, way back, before there were lower case letters, no one claimed that everyone was a corporation.

Ben Franklin liked to change the spelling of his own name on a whim too.

There's even a historical document between two founding fathers (I'll dig it up if anyone is interested) on whether or not to capitalize nouns (one thought it was dignified, the other found it stuck up.)

Kimokeo · Post by **Kimokeo** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:19 pm

The only proper use of punctuation was demonstrated by Victor Borge.

Lawprof · Post by **Lawprof** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:36 pm

The funny thing is that most of their arguments are circular at BEST and usually misconstrue or misread the law. 9 times out of 10 there is a simple answer to their quandary which they choose to ignore.

I've seen the sui j site and I notice that enrollment is closed. Is that entire site a shill? 99% of it is in the alternate reality universe as well. All Rights Reserved, without prejudice, refused for cause . . . . .TOTAL NONSENSE!

LP

Post by **webhick** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:45 pm

Lawprof wrote:I've seen the sui j site and I notice that enrollment is closed. Is that entire site a shill? 99% of it is in the alternate reality universe as well. All Rights Reserved, without prejudice, refused for cause . . . . .TOTAL NONSENSE!

The Illuminati have been working closely with the moderators at Sui to close the rift between dimensions. With Prejudice. Closing registration is the first of many steps. The repeated injections of reality from Quatloos members at Sui have widened the rift considerably, so we may have to start banning and deleting all such posts.

Several members of this dimension are planning to protest outside Sui's locations. If you want to participate, call your local SSDI or Unemployment office for directions.

Disilloosianed · Post by **Disilloosianed** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:25 pm

Oh...while we're on this brand of crazies, don't forget the ones that "copyright" their names and then say that you can't use them without permission. I have one that occasionally send me bills for unauthorized use. I think I'm in the six million range now.

Lawprof · Post by **Lawprof** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:52 pm

I refuse for cause your pre-emptive action and hereby sua sponte notify and demand of you that you answer forthwith pursuant to UCC 1.201 et seq et al ,or I shall common law default you!

HA!

LP

Post by **Demosthenes** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 5:26 pm

Lawprof wrote:I refuse for cause your pre-emptive action and hereby sua sponte notify and demand of you that you answer forthwith pursuant to UCC 1.201 et seq et al ,or I shall common law default you!

HA!

LP

If it ain't written in red crayon and sealed with a 5 cent postage stamp, it don't work.

David Merrill · Post by **David Merrill** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:03 pm

Lawprof wrote:The funny thing is that most of their arguments are circular at BEST and usually misconstrue or misread the law. 9 times out of 10 there is a simple answer to their quandary which they choose to ignore.

I've seen the sui j site and I notice that enrollment is closed. Is that entire site a shill? 99% of it is in the alternate reality universe as well. All Rights Reserved, without prejudice, refused for cause . . . . .TOTAL NONSENSE!

LP

They must have seen you coming Lawprof;

Did you get my entire undeleted post?

Welcome Lawprof!

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/asset-pro ... wprof.html

Regards,

David Merrill.

Lawprof · Post by **Lawprof** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:41 pm

Sorry Dave, it says that registration is disabled when you click on it, before you enter any info. I'm guessing the site is run by a handful of friends who are like-minded. Some are truly paranoid-schizo and the others are scam artists. The foolish stumble on the site not knowing it's a set-up.

Did you see my other post? I'll pay you (I'll give you an American Silver dollar -- worth about 10$ to 15$ by current stds) in exchange for a true copy of what you filed re: your scooter.

LP

David Merrill · Post by **David Merrill** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:19 pm

[quote="Lawprof"]Sorry Dave, it says that registration is disabled when you click on it, before you enter any info. I'm guessing the site is run by a handful of friends who are like-minded. Some are truly paranoid-schizo and the others are scam artists. The foolish stumble on the site not knowing it's a set-up.

Did you see my other post? I'll pay you (I'll give you an American Silver dollar -- worth about 10$ to 15$ by current stds) in exchange for a true copy of what you filed re: your scooter.

LP[/quote]

Yep. I saw it and responded...

[quote="David Merrill"][quote="Lawprof"]David -- do you still have a hard copy of the lawsuit you filed re: your scooter etc? I'd gladly pay you for a hard copy.

LP[/quote]

Have Demosthenes post the docket and note I am telling you the truth when I say that the Manhattan Judgment docketed a week later came back to a suitor postmarked September 12, 2001. It simply had a sticky on it saying, "Thank You."

I remember the security guards had some kind of problem with me having no government employee ID card a week after 9/11. So the clerk came to the lobby and escorted me in to file it - apologizing for rejecting such a monumental judgment while the Towers came down.

It will take a little to get out of mothballs but call (303) 844-3433 and order it up on the information - of course you might enjoy asking, "Could you search for any cases against Jesus Christ?"

When the CIA delivers the package, note it will be opened to the map of Manhattan Island. Specifically a map found in the [i]Jewish Encyclopedia[/i] marking all the Jewish claims there.

Regards,

David Merrill.[/quote]

About the all upper case birth certificate bond; you should be aware that the Manhattan Judgment cured thirty days after Richard Grasso chose to ignore my BOE:

http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/BOE1.gif
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/BOE2.gif
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/onscreen.jpg

Now that is one for your wall. So many people are ordering up certified copies of that, I just had to catch a picture of it on the screen by coincidence one morning. Call my clerk, (719) 520-6200 and ask for Reception #201099293 and the proof of service #201101604. They will be glad to send them along for a few FRNs.

Don't forget that other case from 1995.

http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitor ... lendar.jpg

I can tell you are here for enjoyment and not easily shocked, so have at it.

When you say (or ask) Suijuris is a shill? For whom do you have in mind - I will tell you if you got the right Puppeteer.

Regards,

David Merrill.

Lawprof · Post by **Lawprof** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:46 pm

The document you call the BOE is still too small on my screen for me to read it all. I can tell you that merely writing some legal sounding gibberish on a piece of paper and filing it is no accomplishment: I know incompetent attorneys who do that every day. I'll be shocked when you finally get some actual money out of one of these wacky documents of yours.

LP

David Merrill · Post by **David Merrill** » Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:03 am

[quote="Lawprof"]The document you call the BOE is still too small on my screen for me to read it all. I can tell you that merely writing some legal sounding gibberish on a piece of paper and filing it is no accomplishment: I know incompetent attorneys who do that every day. I'll be shocked when you finally get some actual money out of one of these wacky documents of yours.

LP[/quote]

BZZZZZZT! - - sizzle...

http://Friends-n-Family-Research.info/F ... ion_ER.jpg

That is just one example where the administrator chose not to use a comptroller warrant.

But there are medical doctors using the BOE as assurance bond instead of malpractice insurance. And it bonds about 200+ true judgments in common law [i]res judicata[/i].

Sorry to shock you like that!

Regards,

David Merrill.

Quatloos!

All Caps Nonsense

All Caps Nonsense

The

Re: The

I

Re: I

Re: The

Sorry

Re: Sorry

The

Re: The