This opinion is a hoot

[Judge Roy Bean]

...
Tell that to the US Air Force. lol

I don't know about 2day, but back in the 60's and the early 70's, it was a standard practice for Officers in the Air Force to put their thumb print on their military ID b4 it was laminated.

Do you know why that was done?

[GoldandSilverEagles]

...
Tell that to the US Air Force. lol

I don't know about 2day, but back in the 60's and the early 70's, it was a standard practice for Officers in the Air Force to put their thumb print on their military ID b4 it was laminated.

Do you know why that was done?

Factually, no. I never inquired. I can speculate that it likely had to do with a higher level of security, but that's just a guess.

[ArthurWankspittle]

So what has this got to do with putting your thumbprint on the pages of an affidavit? Nothing - except that it is another example of sovereign cititards finding some irrelevant detail and quoting it out of context as "the law". I'm surprised more judges haven't asked for psychiatric evaluations of the sovereign cititards who come before them, as most of them can't seem to be able to decide what their own names are.

[Paul]

Paul wrote:
That was for identification. "This picture and this printed name and this signature and this print all belong to the same person." I guess you really do have issues comprehending the world around you.

Google the definition for document. An identification card, an "ID" fits within the definition.

Like I said, a comprehension problem. The point is that the print was not used to somehow authenticate the document. Like the picture of the person, it serves to identify him.

[.]

As if our resident idiot could detect the difference.

[Nikki]

In any case, she got it WRONG

The thumb print goes on the bottom-right of the front of the page AND in the same location on the back AFTER a diagonal line is drawn from top-left to bottom-right on the back.

She also failed to affix the Red Fox stamp (diagonally) at the bottom of the last page, thereby rendering the entire document moot.

(edited to correct typo)

[Gregg]

She also failed to affix the Red Fox stamp (diagonally) at the bottom of the last page, thereby rendering the entire document moot.

An error so common it even has a nickname, the "you big dummy" omission. In some jurisdictions the stamp they use when denoting it even shows a 1951 Ford F1 Pickup on it.

[triumphguy2]

Factually, no. I never inquired. I can speculate that it likely had to do with a higher level of security, but that's just a guess.

Sorry, no. It's just identification. I had the same ID card (with fingerprints) when I was commissioned as when I got a Top Secret clearance, or when I changed billets, or when I went into the Reserves.