Still, he got Bork's attention:
So the guy apparently doesn't like opposing opinions on his site. Who else do we know like that?I joined the pacinlawscam blog, and he deleted the feature. See, this psycho does not like the confrontation.
Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean
So the guy apparently doesn't like opposing opinions on his site. Who else do we know like that?I joined the pacinlawscam blog, and he deleted the feature. See, this psycho does not like the confrontation.
You know, I was laughing really hard when I read that comment on his nmg thread. He had every opportunity to argue his position, and he didn't. He just did what he always does in debates: make dumb quips, ad hominems, etc.. So I closed the commenting feature on older posts, save everyone some time. He can still comment on the new ones.wserra wrote: Still, he got Bork's attention:So the guy apparently doesn't like opposing opinions on his site. Who else do we know like that?I joined the pacinlawscam blog, and he deleted the feature. See, this psycho does not like the confrontation.
Hey - since you got involved with this nut at one point in time or another, was it though a local connection (i.e. WI and surrounding Midwestern area) or does he have a larger national presence?Maltese Falcon wrote:Hey wserra,
I'm the author of the blog you posted. By the way, thanks for discovering it.
Nah, I live in MA, and I first heard of LB Bork and Pacinlaw on the Boston community politics section on Craigslist. It seems as if he's trying to go prime time by hiring spammers, but as long as we're here, he'll always be a national joke.buck09 wrote:Hey - since you got involved with this nut at one point in time or another, was it though a local connection (i.e. WI and surrounding Midwestern area) or does he have a larger national presence?Maltese Falcon wrote:Hey wserra,
I'm the author of the blog you posted. By the way, thanks for discovering it.
Better yet, do you have a copy of his book? I do. I'm going to hang onto it for when the US atty's office or state AG needs it
Interesting, searching The Googles shows him spamming a bunch of community forums. My favorite response:Maltese Falcon wrote: Nah, I live in MA, and I first heard of LB Bork and Pacinlaw on the Boston community politics section on Craigslist. It seems as if he's trying to go prime time by hiring spammers, but as long as we're here, he'll always be a national joke.
I'm reposting this until I get an answer from you, "spammer." You need help, whether you know it or not.
I have been reading up on your posts, visiting pacinlaw, notmygovernment, islandmakers, etc..
I deal with people like you on a daily basis. They all have the same problem: child support. You haven't been paying it, and you don't know where to turn. You fall for the dumbest tax defiance theories imaginable.
Listen, you care about your kids, right? Well, I can help you.
Call me, you know my number. We can settle things together, with dignity.
I don't own the The Red Amendment, but I have read the Promo - and man, that was awful. I can't believe that it's second ed. and it still has typos. How hard is it to run a spell check these days?
Also, footnotes are supposed to contain citations and clarifications, not extra venom. Finally, that font. Let's just say that Blade Runner font does not make me think of a scary socialist future. To me, it simply screams 'failed sci-fi writer.'
I suspect that his high school diploma is as hard to come by as Obama's Kenyan birth certificate.That promo has me convinced that LB has never stepped foot in an accredited college.
The rest of the book is just as awful. He didn't write a large chunk of it - there's a lot of copy and paste work. You can tell when that happens because the writing becomes lucid and grammatically correct, regardless if he's actually quoting another source or not. Matrix references abound. There is no logical thought progression between chapters, sections, etc.So how's the rest of the book? Please, do tell in full detail Come to think of it, how did you get that book?
Mr. Bork, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Thought about it, as I mentioned earlier in the thread. I don't think the IRS is the least bit interested in him. The guy lives in a sh*thole western Wisconsin hicktown and bums overnighters off his marks when he travels. I'm still hoping to bump into him in person at some point. I'm a pretty obnoxious bastard in person (if you're a con men, otherwise I'm just a politely quiet midwesterner), and would love to piss in his cornflakes if given the opportunity.What do you think would happen if you were to infringe his copyrights and digitally redistribute the book? It's not like he could sue you, because he doesn't believe in these "14th Amendment courts". And even if he did take you, you could just say "Your Honor, this man is running an sovereign citizens scam. Here's the proof." So even if you got burned, the IRS would still pay him a visit.
Isn't that a sign that you have been successfully mind controlled ?I can only read it in small portions. Grammar as bad as his gives me nosebleeds.
I hate to bug you again about The Red Amendment, but what kind of Matrix references are they? Just quotes or thesis grade analyses?The rest of the book is just as awful. He didn't write a large chunk of it - there's a lot of copy and paste work. You can tell when that happens because the writing becomes lucid and grammatically correct, regardless if he's actually quoting another source or not. Matrix references abound. There is no logical thought progression between chapters, sections, etc.
As much as I don't want to give up hope, I'm gonna have to side with you on that.Thought about it, as I mentioned earlier in the thread. I don't think the IRS is the least bit interested in him. The guy lives in a sh*thole western Wisconsin hicktown and bums overnighters off his marks when he travels. I'm still hoping to bump into him in person at some point. I'm a pretty obnoxious bastard in person (if you're a con men, otherwise I'm just a politely quiet midwesterner), and would love to piss in his cornflakes if given the opportunity.
That is a well researched and educated explanation which, according to Bork, automatically makes it wrong.The Observer wrote:Might want to check out this link from DOJ explaining the history of the seal and phrase
You people are delusional... I have better things to do than play on the Quattard Forum that specializes in ad hominem attacks on people. Anyway, I have not seen any intelligent discussion of law on this forum (not that I am here all that often).The Operative wrote:I could not care less about what he has to say on his personal forum. He is simply too chicken-s**t to seriously debate any of his theories on an open forum such as Quatloos. Every time he does stop by here, he only provides further evidence that: 1) he won't answer a direct question; 2) he cannot coherently state his theories; or 3) he has a problem with English comprehension.
You should stop hanging out with your poo-flinging friends, they seem to influence your "thinking".The Jurist wrote:I see you Marxist monkeys have not retained lives as of yet.
Let's see. In two fairly short posts you call people "Quattards", "Marxist monkeys", "delusional", "psycho boy", "idgits" and more. And you whine about ad hominem.Are you people ever going to answer my question in regard to private law? I am thinking not... The ad hominem attacks are much more fun, right? What a priceless waste of life.
If you refer to Maltese Falcon, I think it speaks a lot for his integrety when you call him psycho boy. Guess he struck a nerve, hey?Oh, I see that East Coast psycho boy joined the Quattards group. Nice! Could make some comments here on his activity and in-the-box mentality, but reserve such at this time.
Quality beats quantity.Thanks for sending all the people to the PAC sites...
We are getting loads of hits... Had about 400 uniques today.
Well, I did a little search on Alexa. Quatloos is nr 217201 in terms of traffic. Now, that is not stellar numbers. But way better than pacinlaw.org at 2665326. But like I said, quality beats quantity. After all, TMZ is #409.p.s. I have noted that PAC generally beats the Quattards site on Google searches. Must have something to do with the popularity of the web portal configuration.
Suuuuuure they have.Oh, and the Latin of the DOJ Seal was translated by someone that has studied the language for 40 years. The rest of the content in the paper is obvious if you do not have your head in the dark cavern between your legs (like you schooled idgits do).
I always find this amusing. Say that a super-powerful cabal is in control of the entire world, and desperatly wants to stay secret. Why do they leave signs such as this all over the place?And, nice touch on the reference from the DOJ site.... Like the government is trusted to tell the truth and not be deceptive. LOL
Well, now, Lenny (or, speaking of hiding, is it "Brett"? Are you in Kieler, WI, or somewhere in IL?), you know who I am, and I make no secret of it. For example,The Jurist wrote:Nice that everyone here pretty much hides behind monikers. The typical CyberPunk way.
Dan Evans is the only member I have noted that does not... At least someone is a man here.
BTW, Lenny, that post certainly looks like a threat to sue me for defamation. You made it almost six months ago. Nothing has happened since.The Jurist wrote:This is you, right...
http://www.iromlaw.com/Bio/WesleySerra.asp
And Wes, assumption is the mother of all defamation tort actions.
That certainly looks like a threat to make a disciplinary complaint against me. Five months ago. I even gave you the address to which to send it. Nothing.Maybe you and your friends here can give me a determination on this:
...
I have not made a Bar complaint in some time. Any merit? I and others think that there is.
Cute, and how apropos. I thought most of you here believed in the Easter Bunny.Thule wrote:The Jurist wrote:
Morning, Wes. You are up early hitting the hobby (although stamp collecting may be much more rewarding).wserra wrote:The Jurist wrote:That certainly looks like a threat to make a disciplinary complaint against me. Five months ago. I even gave you the address to which to send it. Nothing.
Hey, Greg.... I really thought you would be at church this morning ;~)Gregg wrote:Gregg is my real name, "Jurist", and I think a fair number of people know my full name is Gregg Evans (no relation to Dan)
And you still make less sense than a retarded monkey marching band.