Rationality rears its ugly head at LH

[Quixote]

LostHead gdude may be too rational for Lost Horizons. His latest post reveals a disturbing grasp on reality.

databrain wrote:

Common Law Court?

For what it's worth - I think it is time to haul these "companies" in under Common Law and force them to prove their Wx or 1099x crapoloa.

Tim

Well, I hope you have another job lined up. Last time I checked, there is a lot people out there looking for one!

[Thule]

Slight edit for clarity;

databrain wrote:
Common Law Court?

For what it's worth - I think it is time to haul these "companies" in under Common Law and force them to prove their Wx or 1099x crapoloa.

Tim

Well, I hope you have another job lined up. Last time I checked, there is a lot people out there looking for one!

[LPC]

Slight edit for clarity;

An edit that was too subtle for me. I couldn't find it.

[Gregg]

He made it clear that Gdude was quoting DataBrain, it took me a minute, too.

[LPC]

He made it clear that Gdude was quoting DataBrain, it took me a minute, too.

And that provides "clarity" because.....?

Who cares about who wrote what gibberish?

I am now angry about the seconds I wasted looking for some meaning in what turns out to have been a question about attribution among imbeciles.

[Gregg]

He made it clear that Gdude was quoting DataBrain, it took me a minute, too.

And that provides "clarity" because.....?

Who cares about who wrote what gibberish?

I am now angry about the seconds I wasted looking for some meaning in what turns out to have been a question about attribution among imbeciles.

Hey, I just pointed it out. Actually, when i first saw it I was tempted to just correct the first post and delete the second.

[Quixote]

He made it clear that Gdude was quoting DataBrain, it took me a minute, too.

And that provides "clarity" because.....?

Who cares about who wrote what gibberish?

I am now angry about the seconds I wasted looking for some meaning in what turns out to have been a question about attribution among imbeciles.

But the second imbecile has the sense to realize that the first imbecile's job could be on the line if he acts like an imbecile. That's progress for a LostHead.

[The Observer]

But the second imbecile has the sense to realize that the first imbecile's job could be on the line if he acts like an imbecile. That's progress for a LostHead.

But that is a mighty big presumption that any LHer can recognize imbecilic actions. My take was that this had to be one of the undercover Illuminati planted there momentarily forgetting their cover and blurting out what they really think.

[Brandybuck]

Another possible rejoinder to Datumbrain's suggestion:

"What happens if we serve them with Common Law Subpoena and then they ignore us?"

[Imalawman]

He made it clear that Gdude was quoting DataBrain, it took me a minute, too.

And that provides "clarity" because.....?

Who cares about who wrote what gibberish?

I am now angry about the seconds I wasted looking for some meaning in what turns out to have been a question about attribution among imbeciles.

Let me get this straight, you wrote the FAQ, and yet you're now worried wasting seconds on imbeciles? My friend, you passed the point of no return a long time ago - wasting time on imbeciles is just part of your life now.

[Thule]

I am now angry about the seconds I wasted looking for some meaning in what turns out to have been a question about attribution among imbeciles.

My apologies for the confusion. But if you were looking for meaning in a discussion between Databrain an Gdude, well, you should have known better:)