Tax denier hits on a surefire plan

A collection of old posts from all forums. No new threads or new posts in old threads allowed. For archive use only.
Quixote
Quatloosian Master of Deception
Posts: 1542
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Sanhoudalistan

Tax denier hits on a surefire plan

Post by Quixote »

From the forum on shreveporttimes.com
Reporting gross income as tax taxable income makes it even harder for the government to get you.
_________________
RFuselier
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Famspear »

Wow, reporting your income and paying the tax! What a sneaky, nefarious way of avoiding criminal liability! There is no limit to the schemes that some people will come up with.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Re: Tax denier hits on a surefire plan

Post by Demosthenes »

RFuselier
Hmmmm....
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2, 2005
http://WWW.USDOJ.GOV
TAX
(202) 514-2007
TDD (202) 514-1888


COURT BARS LOUISIANA TAX RETURN PREPARERS

Two Lafayette Men Used Frivolous “Claim Of Right” Scheme

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Justice Department announced today that a federal court has barred Richard A. Fuselier and Richard J. Ortt and their organization, Compensation Consultants-all of Lafayette-from preparing tax returns for others and from promoting tax evasion schemes. In entering the preliminary injunction, Judge Tucker L. Melancon of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana also ordered the defendants to provide the government their customers’ names, mailing and e-mail addresses, and phone and Social Security numbers.

The court found that Fuselier and Ortt promote the “claim of right” and “not for profit” schemes, which are based on the false position that compensation or earnings cannot be taxed. The court found that the men promote their schemes through word-of-mouth and over the Internet, and charge customers $500 per year. The court also found that Fuselier and Ortt instruct customers to submit bogus tort claims against the government when it denies the customers’ tax refund requests.

“The Justice Department’s Tax Division is committed to stopping the promotion and use of tax fraud schemes,” said Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General for the Tax Division. “People who fall for tax fraud schemes are enriching the promoters while buying themselves past due tax bills with interest, penalties, and the possibility of more serious legal consequences.”

The court also ordered Fuselier and Ortt to notify their customers of the injunction and post it on their websites. In addition the court barred the defendants from representing customers before the IRS.

More information about this case is available at <http> The frivolous “claim of right” scheme is on the IRS’s new list of “dirty dozen” tax scams: http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,, ... 37,00.html

http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/txdv04709.htm .

The Justice Department has sought and obtained injunctions against a number of tax-scam promoters. Information about these cases is available at http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/taxpress2005.htm . Information about the Justice Department's Tax Division can be found at http://www.usdoj.gov/tax .
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Famspear »

Interesting, although "Fuselier" is a somewhat common (French) surname in Louisiana.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 4287
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am

Post by grixit »

I can't find their website.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4