Mr. Eastman wrote:
Can you give anything to anybody else that you do not possess?
Pottapaug1938 wrote:
Of course, you have a specific example in mind. I'd hate to reply to this in a way such that you could twist my reply to buttress some legal fantasy....
Mr. Eastman wrote:
Pottapaug1938 must be a lawyer. Can't or won't answer a yes/no question with a yes or no. That's okay. The answer is self-evident.
Thank you for replying though.
Pottapaug1938 wrote:In fact, I was a lawyer; but your remark is perfect proof of how you like to take other peoples' writings and distort them, through the filter of your own biases, to buttress your fantasies. And, when I was a lawyer, and someone asked me a general question such as you posed to us, my answer was much the same: "what do you have in mind?"
Certainly, you must have had some reason for asking your question. Let's hear it.
I stated: "
Pottapaug1938 must be a lawyer."
Pottapaug1938 stated: "
In fact, I was a lawyer"
Exactly.
Pottapaug1938 stated: "
your remark is perfect proof of how you like to take other peoples' writings and distort them...", blah blah.
Your acknowledging the correctness of my remark is perfect proof that your reply illustrated that you are/were a lawyer.
You are correct, I have a reason for asking my question.
I also know how lawyerly minded people won't answer questions.
Mr. Pottapaug, You and I know that you can't give anything to anybody that you don't possess.
You can't give me a silver dollar unless you possess a silver dollar.
So if you can prove that you can give me a silver dollar that you don't possess, please enter the proof into evidence.
wserra wrote:Mr. Eastman wrote:Can't or won't answer a yes/no question with a yes or no.
Do you enjoy looking like an idiot in public? Please answer a yes/no question with a yes or no.
No.
darling wrote:What happened to 4 and 6?
Voltaire wrote:If you wish to communicate with me, first define your terms.
Cpt Banjo wrote:Eastman's question is a thinly-veiled introduction to discuss his argument against the concept of authority
You are correct.
Famspear wrote:
Oh, wait, did you take what I wrote as a series of insults?
Not when I consider the source.
Famspear wrote:Clue: Your first post indicates that you came here to stir up a "hornet's nest", as you put it.
Just my being here does that.
Demosthenes wrote:
Dale, what detax scheme are you hyping these days?
What? No wining, dining, and foreplay?
CaptainKickback wrote:In a very small group/tribe/village - say 100 people or smaller - you likely can get by with no central authority or figure of power. Government by consensus. However get beyond that and you begin to need specialization, and some form of hierarchy in order to get things done.
Assertion noted.