Cryer---does he have to pay?

[ASITStands]

How long before there might be charges of impeding and obstructing? Or, an injunction against Truth Attack?

Or, is it the consensus of those in the know that civil procedures will ensue first? My guess is the latter.

[John J. Bulten]

How long before there might be charges of impeding and obstructing? Or, an injunction against Truth Attack?

Or, is it the consensus of those in the know that civil procedures will ensue first? My guess is the latter.

Cryer thinks TruthAttack is essentially unenjoinable and invincible on First Amendment grounds. I lost the last argument I had with him (I was bearish on his acquittal) so am not joining this one.

He also doesn't sell anything (contributions are always accepted) so I don't know how impeding and obstructing would stick. Rather they will pursue an NOD based on his admissions in court. He has the info he needs to mount a CtC defense, but does not appear likely to do so.

[jg]

He has the info he needs to mount a CtC defense, but does not appear likely to do so.

Given the track record of CtC there is no reason to do so.

Is there some source where one can find out what constitutes " a CtC defense"; or is that just persistently asserting that the monies received are not subject to income tax because I say so (due to some imaginary prerequisite frivolity of "privilege", "taxable activity", etc.) ?

[wserra]

Is there some source where one can find out what constitutes " a CtC defense"?

Well, sure.



Unfortunately, though, it's not that funny. Or make as much sense.

[Disilloosianed]

Hey Third Time, how's it going with your employee, by the way? Has he filled out your forms?