Mitch Modeleski aka Paul Andrew Mitchell

[Demosthenes]

Indicted.

http://cheatingfrenzy.com/PAM_indict.pdf

[Lambkin]

Just when things were getting a little dull in the lower 48.

[AndyK]

ASTONISHED

I always thought PAM was just a side-of-the-road lunatic, promoting his views of legal procedure and practice -- very similar to SFBFKADVMP.

I never expected him to get involved in anything ilegal beyond unauthorized, albeit inept, practice of law.

I guess he finally ran short enough of funds to totally step over the line.

[Famspear]

Whoah! This IS a shocker.



And, the way the news is delivered! Demo, you've been makin' yerself kinda scarce lately. But this time, you come around bringin' big news.....

[Famspear]

An IRS Special Agent by the name of James Marcy is mentioned in the materials Demo linked.

In connection with that, I have just found the following fakery on Modeleski's web site. It purports to be his "Verified Criminal Complaint" dated July 26, 2013, in a magical, mystical case styled as "People of the United States of America ex relatione Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiffs, v. James Marcy, Dave Guest, and Does 1 thru 20, Defendants."



Here's the link:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/spd/marcy/crim ... plaint.htm

And here's the bulk of the text:

Relator Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., is currently a Citizen of Washington State and nationally recognized Private Attorney General living and working in Seattle, Washington State.

During the period in question, Defendant James Marcy has claimed to be a Special Agent doing Criminal Investigation for the Internal Revenue Service with offices in Cheyenne, Wyoming.

However, Mr. Marcy has failed to produce any credentials proving said claim, after being presented with a proper Request under the Freedom of Information Act for valid U.S. Office of Personnel Management Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution and by the Federal laws at 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331.

During the period in question, Defendant Dave Guest has also claimed to be a Special Agent doing Criminal Investigation for the Internal Revenue Service with offices in Fort Collins, Colorado.

However, Mr. Guest has also failed to produce any credentials proving said claim, after being presented with a proper Request under the Freedom of Information Act for valid U.S. Office of Personnel Management Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution and by the Federal laws at 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331.

John Doe #1 thru John Doe #20 are as yet unnamed accomplices, accessories and/or co-conspirators with Defendants Marcy and Guest.

[ . . . ]


On June 11, 2013 A.D., without any appointment Defendants Marcy and Guest confronted Relator on the sidewalk in front of Relator’s mailing service in Seattle, Washington.

Defendant Marcy presented Relator with paperwork which was styled “search warrant”, but it lacked the authorized signature of a Clerk or Deputy Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington State. See 28 U.S.C. 1691, in chief.

Said “search warrant” was also signed by one James P. Donohue doing business as a “U.S. Magistrate Judge”. However, Mr. Donohue has also failed or refused to produce the OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required of him by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution and by the Federal laws at 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331.

A third man identified himself as a U.S. Marshal named “Ray”, but “Ray” refused to produce a business card, badge, or to disclose his full name to Relator.

Relator verbally objected to these three (3) men for the specific defects in said “search warrant” which are summarized above.

When Relator refused to consent to a search or seizure of private property inside Relator’s dwelling unit, “Ray” stated his intent to “break in”. Relator immediately objected to “Ray” that breaking and entering is a felony.

Relator then announced his specific intent to go straightaway to the Office of Clerk at the U.S. District Court in downtown Seattle, to confirm in person whether or not the required credentials were in the legal custody of that Office, as required by 5 U.S.C. 2906.

Relator did go straightaway to that Clerk’s Office and was met at the entrance of the Federal Courthouse by a Deputy U.S. Marshal who is assigned to Relator in his capacity as a qualified Federal Witness.

That Deputy U.S. Marshal then escorted Relator to the public counter of the Clerk’s Office in that Federal Courthouse.

A woman seated at that public counter refused to produce any of the requested credentials, and she also stated clearly that “they were not going to cooperate” with Relator.

The latter refusal to cooperate was witnessed by the Deputy U.S. Marshal who accompanied Relator to that public counter.

While leaving the Federal Courthouse, Relator was told by said Deputy U.S. Marshal that the “search warrant” was in the process of being executed.

While walking back to his dwelling unit, Relator contacted the Seattle Police Department and requested a civil standby. Two (2) Seattle Police Officers responded promptly and drove Relator back to his apartment building.

The federal “agents” who were executing said “search warrant” evidently told the lead Seattle Police Officer that it was “valid”.

Because of the missing credentials for Mr. Donohue, and for Mr. William M. McCool whose name appeared in the rubber stamp on said “search warrant”, Relator has concluded that “Ray” and Defendants Marcy and Guest lied to Relator’s landlord, they lied to Relator’s neighbors, and they lied to two (2) Seattle Police Officers.

All Defendants presently remain in possession and/or control of stolen property, seized from Relator’s dwelling unit under color of official right and under patently false and fraudulent pretenses.

[ . . . ]

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (Federal Government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). See Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties are all the supreme Law of the Land).

Dated: July 26, 2013 A.D.

What a Wackadooster!

[.]

So, a grand jury is hearing evidence about your use of trusts to help your clients to evade taxes.

What do you do? Dig your hole deeper by conspiring to obstruct and actually obstructing the grand jury. That oughta be good for a few years in prison.

One would assume that eventually an indictment for the tax evasion will be forthcoming. Convictions on that might be good for a decade or more depending on the amounts involved plus probably an offender level sentencing guideline bump as you now have a criminal record of convictions for the conspiracy and actual obstruction.

Pure genius.

[webhick]

ENM must be laughing her ass off right now.

[wserra]

MODELESKI operated the "Supreme Law Firm" out of a rented one-bedroom apartment in Seattle.

Now that's hitting below the belt.

[Demosthenes]

Whoah! This IS a shocker.



And, the way the news is delivered! Demo, you've been makin' yerself kinda scarce lately. But this time, you come around bringin' big news.....

You mean like the fact that I finally have a release date for the book?

[Famspear]

Whoah! This IS a shocker.



And, the way the news is delivered! Demo, you've been makin' yerself kinda scarce lately. But this time, you come around bringin' big news.....

You mean like the fact that I finally have a release date for the book?

You are full of surprises! Give us the news!

[grixit]

Whoah! This IS a shocker.



And, the way the news is delivered! Demo, you've been makin' yerself kinda scarce lately. But this time, you come around bringin' big news.....

You mean like the fact that I finally have a release date for the book?

Fortunately, i had finished swallowing my drink just before i read that.

[webhick]

You mean like the fact that I finally have a release date for the book?

Don't leave us hanging...

[The Observer]

I can't wait for the trial so we can watch a Private Attorney General on the loose in a federal court room and learn....not what to do.

[notorial dissent]

So, as I read the indictment, Hill was running a tax avoidance scam and somehow got PAM in the middle of it as a legal advisor. I don't think this says much for Hill's intelligence if he swallowed PAM's very obvious line of bull. Kind of a case of one con man getting taken by another and then them both ending up in the same stew pot.

I'm impressed they were able to actually track him down as he has gone to great lengths to conceal where he actually lived for a long time due to his numerous court losses.

I'm sure the Fed court people in Seattle were glad to see things falling in on him as I am sure he has been a near constant pain over the years.

All I can say, is that I can't think of a more deserving person.

[Dr. Caligari]

Indicted.

http://cheatingfrenzy.com/PAM_indict.pdf

If I were the judge (fat chance, I know), I would dismiss Counts 8 and 9 as charging only conduct protected by the First Amendment. Counts 1-7 do state an offense, though (IMHO).

Filing some document with the court saying that the grand jury has no power to issue subpoenas is protected petitioning of the government. Telling the people who got the subpoenas not to comply is obstruction of justice.

[notorial dissent]

I would suspect that by the time they are done investigating PAM, that they will find lots of even more juicy bits, and I am certain his court antics will be quite noteworthy, on top of being totally useless. Which is to say, that I am betting there will be a superseding indictment, and probably several.

I wonder if he'll ever get his precious oaths of office he is so concerned with.

[AndyK]

What PAM wil probably get is a competency hearing, which he'll pass by the thickness of an onion skin, and a hearing as to representing himself -- or at least standby counsel.

Whatever happens, it won't be pretty -- hilarious, but not pretty.

I hope ENM is still around and following this.

[grixit]

Yeah someone should contact ENM and let her know.

BTW, i've forgotten. Is PAM the one with the magic spell of indictment bouncing that says if you prosecute him, you're actually prosecuting yourself? Or was that someone else?

[notorial dissent]

I think it is a given that PAM will get a competency hearing. I can't imagine him tolerating the prospect of even a standby counsel, his ego wouldn't allow it.

I really do have sympathy for the judge and whatever attorney they assign to prosecute as they are going to be buried in meaningless paper and outrageous demands for documents and things.

[AndyK]

Yeah someone should contact ENM and let her know.

BTW, i've forgotten. Is PAM the one with the magic spell of indictment bouncing that says if you prosecute him, you're actually prosecuting yourself? Or was that someone else?

"Prosecuting yourself" wasn't PAM's. Crissie Hansen.