ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean
-
- Scalawag
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:26 am
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Thx Prof, "No playin', no jivin' - just business. "
What say yee' all? Did it rebut my statement?
What say yee' all? Did it rebut my statement?
If this was my last post, you'd know I was inappropriately banned
You know I'm right you're wrong I'm wrong you know I'm right ...
I consent to ban other users and moderate their posts.
You know I'm right you're wrong I'm wrong you know I'm right ...
I consent to ban other users and moderate their posts.
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:47 pm
- Location: The Gorge, Oregon
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
ngupowered wrote:Thx Prof, "No playin', no jivin' - just business. "
What say yee' all? Did it rebut my statement?
What, exactly, will you accept as a rebuttal? I've read a goodly number of well thought out rebuttals but you seem to be insisting on something markedly different.
So: What, to you, is a proper rebuttal?
1. There is a kind of law that I like, which are my own rules, which I call common law. It applies to me.
2. There are many other kinds of law but they don’t apply to me, because I say so."
LLAP
2. There are many other kinds of law but they don’t apply to me, because I say so."
LLAP
-
- Farting Cow Emeritus
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 6:03 am
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Yes.ngupowered wrote:Did it rebut my statement?
Anyone debating this fool is wasting their time as well. He's got nothing, no reason to think the way he does, but for a few Menard or Clifford videos (or if you're lucky, maybe a Druanna - she's at least not bad to look at and goes off into tangential new age nuttiness for extra entertainment factor).Pottapaug1938 wrote:You are wasting your time doing this. The only thing that we need or want from you is an unreversed appellate court case supporting the proposition that consent to jurisdiction is necessary in criminal cases. Do you have such a case?
You can answer in one of two ways: yes or no. After that, we'll talk.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
- Location: Soho London
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
That question is one for you to answer.ngupowered wrote:
What say yee' all? Did it rebut my statement?
In your opinion did it rebut your statement?
Yes or No?
If "No" please explain exactly why it did not rebut your statement.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
-
- Scalawag
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:26 am
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Obadiah, seems you believe that I believe it didn't rebut my statement?
"Anyone debating this fool is wasting their time as well" - Yet, here you are. Who then is the better fool?
"Menard or Clifford videos " - Eh? You are seriously confused.
rumpel, I asked you first.
"Anyone debating this fool is wasting their time as well" - Yet, here you are. Who then is the better fool?
"Menard or Clifford videos " - Eh? You are seriously confused.
rumpel, I asked you first.
If this was my last post, you'd know I was inappropriately banned
You know I'm right you're wrong I'm wrong you know I'm right ...
I consent to ban other users and moderate their posts.
You know I'm right you're wrong I'm wrong you know I'm right ...
I consent to ban other users and moderate their posts.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
- Location: Soho London
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Yes.ngupowered wrote:
rumpel, I asked you first.
Now answer my question.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
-
- Farting Cow Emeritus
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 6:03 am
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
NGU, while others have debated you, I haven't. There's no reason trying to debate someone who is not remotely qualified to hold a conversation on a subject, yet is for some reason opinionated and contrary about it. I don't know where you get your garbage - there are an unlimited amount of charlatans selling this crap all over the internut, and you're probably one of them.ngupowered wrote: "Anyone debating this fool is wasting their time as well" - Yet, here you are. Who then is the better fool?
"Menard or Clifford videos " - Eh? You are seriously confused.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
- Location: Soho London
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
You mean the Karl Lentz who tried to sue the government for $300,000,000?ngupowered wrote:
You need to start listening to Karl Lentz on talkshoe to water that dried shrunken fig brain of yours.
How did that go for him?
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 4:58 pm
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Didn't go so well in the real court, but he's still raking in one US dollar per second in Lentz Court.rumpelstilzchen wrote:You mean the Karl Lentz who tried to sue the government for $300,000,000?ngupowered wrote:
You need to start listening to Karl Lentz on talkshoe to water that dried shrunken fig brain of yours.
How did that go for him?
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6125
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
I have absolutely no doubt that, if a defendant in a criminal case had to consent to jurisdiction in order for that jurisdiction to attach, "upstanding citizens" like Whitey Bulger, Richard Reid (shoe bomber), Ed and Elaine Brown, and Bernie Madoff would all be free people today. Add to that a long list of wealthy people, accused of crimes and able to afford the best criminal defense lawyers available, who still got convicted and sentenced to prison; and you wonder why they didn't raise lack of consent as a bar to prosecution, while penny-ante schmucks like ngupowered seem to know all about it.Bovine, Flatulating: wrote:NGU, while others have debated you, I haven't. There's no reason trying to debate someone who is not remotely qualified to hold a conversation on a subject, yet is for some reason opinionated and contrary about it. I don't know where you get your garbage - there are an unlimited amount of charlatans selling this crap all over the internut, and you're probably one of them.ngupowered wrote: "Anyone debating this fool is wasting their time as well" - Yet, here you are. Who then is the better fool?
"Menard or Clifford videos " - Eh? You are seriously confused.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Scalawag
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:05 pm
- Location: An hour from Spuzzum
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
They're all in on the conspiracy to deprive people of their rights. Everybody knows that. ![Laugh :haha:](./images/smilies/005.gif)
![Laugh :haha:](./images/smilies/005.gif)
-
- Judge for the District of Quatloosia
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 6:04 pm
- Location: West of the Pecos
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Why does anyone need to rebut jibberish?ngupowered wrote:Thx Prof, "No playin', no jivin' - just business. "
What say yee' all? Did it rebut my statement?
It's time to stop feeding the troll.
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6125
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
I'm done with him. He has been painted into a corner, but he still insists that he can dance to his heart's content and now get covered in paint.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:13 pm
- Location: Maryland
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Quatshed has been invoked
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7584
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
My God, I agree with something gnupowered said.ngupowered wrote:"Anyone debating this fool is wasting their time as well" - Yet, here you are. Who then is the better fool?
Must go wash my brain out with soap.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
-
- Scalawag
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:26 am
Rebut 'In Jail By Consent'
Continuing on 'ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There'.
People there got aroused and excited, just like a couple of retards, convincing themselves to shut down the thread. Apparently they need fresh posts hourly to satiate their troll fix, giving me no time to respond.
ST1 = Courts require consent of the parties, expressed or implied in action, for adjudication.
ST2 = Prof's post rebutts ST1.
So, your silence shall constitute tacit acquiescence in the affirmative to ST2 - rebuttals within 48 hours.
People there got aroused and excited, just like a couple of retards, convincing themselves to shut down the thread. Apparently they need fresh posts hourly to satiate their troll fix, giving me no time to respond.
ST1 = Courts require consent of the parties, expressed or implied in action, for adjudication.
ST2 = Prof's post rebutts ST1.
So, your silence shall constitute tacit acquiescence in the affirmative to ST2 - rebuttals within 48 hours.
If this was my last post, you'd know I was inappropriately banned
You know I'm right you're wrong I'm wrong you know I'm right ...
I consent to ban other users and moderate their posts.
You know I'm right you're wrong I'm wrong you know I'm right ...
I consent to ban other users and moderate their posts.
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:47 pm
- Location: The Gorge, Oregon
Re: Rebut 'In Jail By Consent'
And once again, what will you accept as a proper rebuttal?ngupowered wrote:Continuing on 'ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There'.
People there got aroused and excited, just like a couple of retards, convincing themselves to shut down the thread. Apparently they need fresh posts hourly to satiate their troll fix, giving me no time to respond.
ST1 = Courts require consent of the parties, expressed or implied in action, for adjudication.
ST2 = Prof's post rebutts ST1.
So, your silence shall constitute tacit acquiescence in the affirmative to ST2 - rebuttals within 48 hours.
1. There is a kind of law that I like, which are my own rules, which I call common law. It applies to me.
2. There are many other kinds of law but they don’t apply to me, because I say so."
LLAP
2. There are many other kinds of law but they don’t apply to me, because I say so."
LLAP
-
- Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:13 pm
- Location: Maryland
Re: Rebut 'In Jail By Consent'
Quatshed
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders
-
- Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am
Re: ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There
Old thread unlocked and merged the two together.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6125
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: Rebut 'In Jail By Consent'
Nothing whatsoever. He's too busy playing unilateral word games for that. He has been repeatedly challenged to provide at least one case showing that the defendant's consent is necessary for jurisdiction to attach to him/her; but all we get from his is cowardly evasion. All he cares about is evading, ducking, weaving, shucking and jiving until we get tired of him; and then he, like so many of his type, will strut off to his own world of like-minded circle-jerkers and crow about how he challenged the Quatloosers for an answer to his question but they could never give him one.obadiah wrote:And once again, what will you accept as a proper rebuttal?ngupowered wrote:Continuing on 'ngupowered On How Everyone in Jail Consented to Be There'.
People there got aroused and excited, just like a couple of retards, convincing themselves to shut down the thread. Apparently they need fresh posts hourly to satiate their troll fix, giving me no time to respond.
ST1 = Courts require consent of the parties, expressed or implied in action, for adjudication.
ST2 = Prof's post rebutts ST1.
So, your silence shall constitute tacit acquiescence in the affirmative to ST2 - rebuttals within 48 hours.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools