https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxgwcqRY9aI

ninj
Moderator: Deep Knight
I guarantee that claim of his is a lie.there was a prior settlement
I thought that too.Jeffrey wrote:I guarantee that claim of his is a lie.there was a prior settlement
LightinDarkness wrote:Japanese guys carrying bonds
Please RVD, PLEASE do this."You don't go into court proclaiming anything, you simply file a CLAIM and your claim will always supersede their criminal COMPLAINT
Your claim must be heard BEFORE they can proceed with the complaint. You see, what gov't is doing to us is this:
Some prosecuting attorney brings forth a criminal complaint against you because gov't cannot file claims because gov't is not a man.
Gov't and their agents can ONLY file complaints in hopes that you will agree to go along as a defendant in THEIR case against you. If you play along, they'll treat their measly assed criminal complaint as an actual CLAIM and the STATE as an injured party
Only a MAN can file a verifiable CLAIM against another Man, and if you haven't harmed another Man or his property, then no law has been broken.
Therefore, the prosecuting attorney who's bringing you up on a criminal complaint for possession of marijuana is ultimately bringing forth a false claim because your possession of marijuana did not harm HIM or HIS personal property, capiche?
Therefore, you file a CLAIM against him for bringing forth a false claim against you, and your claim will supersede his COMPLAINT. As men and women on American soil who utilize the common law, we do NOT answer complaints, as they are toothless pieces of paper that have no force or effect in actual law. They are just COMPLAINTS and who gives a fuck about a complaint?
In order for a claim to move forward, there MUST be a corpus delicti that will take the stand and point at you and say "That man right there cut down my tree" and I wish to be compensated."
Can the youtube commenter provide a law of English grammar that allows him to put random common nouns in all-caps?LightinDarkness wrote:Wserra...![]()
![]()
"You don't go into court proclaiming anything, you simply file a CLAIM and your claim will always supersede their criminal COMPLAINT
Your claim must be heard BEFORE they can proceed with the complaint. You see, what gov't is doing to us is this:
Some prosecuting attorney brings forth a criminal complaint against you because gov't cannot file claims because gov't is not a man.
Gov't and their agents can ONLY file complaints in hopes that you will agree to go along as a defendant in THEIR case against you. If you play along, they'll treat their measly assed criminal complaint as an actual CLAIM and the STATE as an injured party
Only a MAN can file a verifiable CLAIM against another Man, and if you haven't harmed another Man or his property, then no law has been broken.
Therefore, the prosecuting attorney who's bringing you up on a criminal complaint for possession of marijuana is ultimately bringing forth a false claim because your possession of marijuana did not harm HIM or HIS personal property, capiche?
Therefore, you file a CLAIM against him for bringing forth a false claim against you, and your claim will supersede his COMPLAINT. As men and women on American soil who utilize the common law, we do NOT answer complaints, as they are toothless pieces of paper that have no force or effect in actual law. They are just COMPLAINTS and who gives a fuck about a complaint?
In order for a claim to move forward, there MUST be a corpus delicti that will take the stand and point at you and say "That man right there cut down my tree" and I wish to be compensated."
It actually isn't. The rest of what Van Dyke claims is, but not that part. And, of course, the settlement wasn't at all what he claims it was.Jeffrey wrote:I guarantee that claim of his is a lie.there was a prior settlement